These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1007 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25708846)

  • 1. [Comparison of frozen embryo transfer outcomes at blastocyst stage according to freezing method and type of endometrial preparation].
    Pouget O; Scalici E; Hoa-Ferrieres A; Deutsch-Bringer S; Gala A; Dechaud H; Hamamah S
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2015 Mar; 43(3):219-24. PubMed ID: 25708846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Is large for gestational age in singletons born after frozen embryo transfer associated with freezing technique or endometrial preparation protocol? A longitudinal national French study.
    Hesters L; Sermondade N; Lambert C; Pouly JL; Pereira B; Lucas C; Levy R; Brugnon F;
    Hum Reprod; 2024 Apr; 39(4):724-732. PubMed ID: 38384249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Contribution of embryo vitrification procedure to ART efficiency].
    Sifer C
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2014 Oct; 42(10):721-4. PubMed ID: 25192924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of cell loss after vitrification or slow-freezing on further in vitro development and implantation of human Day 3 embryos.
    Van Landuyt L; Van de Velde H; De Vos A; Haentjens P; Blockeel C; Tournaye H; Verheyen G
    Hum Reprod; 2013 Nov; 28(11):2943-9. PubMed ID: 24014599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The freezing method of cleavage stage embryos has no impact on the weight of the newborns.
    Kaartinen N; Kananen K; Huhtala H; Keränen S; Tinkanen H
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2016 Mar; 33(3):393-399. PubMed ID: 26749388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Perinatal outcomes of singletons following vitrification versus slow-freezing of embryos: a multicenter cohort study using propensity score analysis.
    Gu F; Li S; Zheng L; Gu J; Li T; Du H; Gao C; Ding C; Quan S; Zhou C; Li P; Xu Y
    Hum Reprod; 2019 Sep; 34(9):1788-1798. PubMed ID: 31407797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical outcomes following cryopreservation of blastocysts by vitrification or slow freezing: a population-based cohort study.
    Li Z; Wang YA; Ledger W; Edgar DH; Sullivan EA
    Hum Reprod; 2014 Dec; 29(12):2794-801. PubMed ID: 25316444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Vitrification of cleavage stage day 3 embryos results in higher live birth rates than conventional slow freezing: a RCT.
    Debrock S; Peeraer K; Fernandez Gallardo E; De Neubourg D; Spiessens C; D'Hooghe TM
    Hum Reprod; 2015 Aug; 30(8):1820-30. PubMed ID: 26089301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Factors affecting the outcome of frozen-thawed embryo transfer.
    Veleva Z; Orava M; Nuojua-Huttunen S; Tapanainen JS; Martikainen H
    Hum Reprod; 2013 Sep; 28(9):2425-31. PubMed ID: 23756705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Developmentally delayed cleavage-stage embryos maintain comparable implantation rates in frozen embryo transfers.
    Burks H; Buckbinder J; Francis-Hernandez M; Chung K; Jabara S; Bendikson K; Paulson R
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2015 Oct; 32(10):1477-81. PubMed ID: 26347340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Slow freezing should not be totally substituted by vitrification when applied to day 3 embryo cryopreservation: an analysis of 5613 frozen cycles.
    Zhu HY; Xue YM; Yang LY; Jiang LY; Ling C; Tong XM; Zhang SY
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2015 Sep; 32(9):1371-7. PubMed ID: 26238389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fresh transfer of Day 5 slow-growing embryos versus deferred transfer of vitrified, fully expanded Day 6 blastocysts: which is the optimal approach?
    Tannus S; Cohen Y; Henderson S; Al Ma'mari N; Shavit T; Son WY; Dahan MH
    Hum Reprod; 2019 Jan; 34(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 30517719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Frozen-thawed embryo transfer in a natural or mildly hormonally stimulated cycle in women with regular ovulatory cycles: a RCT.
    Peeraer K; Couck I; Debrock S; De Neubourg D; De Loecker P; Tomassetti C; Laenen A; Welkenhuysen M; Meeuwis L; Pelckmans S; Meuleman C; D'Hooghe T
    Hum Reprod; 2015 Nov; 30(11):2552-62. PubMed ID: 26364081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Does the endometrial receptivity array really provide personalized embryo transfer?
    Bassil R; Casper R; Samara N; Hsieh TB; Barzilay E; Orvieto R; Haas J
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2018 Jul; 35(7):1301-1305. PubMed ID: 29737471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Live birth rate following frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer is higher with blastocysts expanded on Day 5 than on Day 6.
    Ferreux L; Bourdon M; Sallem A; Santulli P; Barraud-Lange V; Le Foll N; Maignien C; Chapron C; de Ziegler D; Wolf JP; Pocate-Cheriet K
    Hum Reprod; 2018 Mar; 33(3):390-398. PubMed ID: 29394365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Outcome of embryo vitrification compared to slow freezing process at early cleavage stages. Report of the first French birth].
    Sifer C; Sermondade N; Dupont C; Poncelet C; Cédrin-Durnerin I; Hugues JN; Benzacken B; Levy R
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2012 Mar; 40(3):158-61. PubMed ID: 22154672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Oocyte, embryo and blastocyst cryopreservation in ART: systematic review and meta-analysis comparing slow-freezing versus vitrification to produce evidence for the development of global guidance.
    Rienzi L; Gracia C; Maggiulli R; LaBarbera AR; Kaser DJ; Ubaldi FM; Vanderpoel S; Racowsky C
    Hum Reprod Update; 2017 Mar; 23(2):139-155. PubMed ID: 27827818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical outcomes of frozen-thawed single blastocyst transfer in patients requiring whole embryo freezing.
    He QH; Wang L; Liang LL; Zhang HL; Zhang CL; Li HS; Cui SH
    Syst Biol Reprod Med; 2016; 62(2):133-8. PubMed ID: 26889741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Large-volume vitrification of human biopsied and non-biopsied blastocysts: a simple, robust technique for cryopreservation.
    Reed ML; Said AH; Thompson DJ; Caperton CL
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2015 Feb; 32(2):207-14. PubMed ID: 25464896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of different open cryo-carriers on embryo survival and clinical outcome in frozen embryo transfer cycle patients.
    Chu D; Fu L; Zhou W; Li Y
    Syst Biol Reprod Med; 2018 Apr; 64(2):138-145. PubMed ID: 29353513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 51.