These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25711157)

  • 1. Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing 2 Flexible Digital Ureteroscopes: ACMI/Olympus Invisio DUR-D and Olympus URF-V.
    Shah K; Monga M; Knudsen B
    Urology; 2015 Jun; 85(6):1267-71. PubMed ID: 25711157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Durability of flexible ureteroscopes: a randomized, prospective study.
    Monga M; Best S; Venkatesh R; Ames C; Lee C; Kuskowski M; Schwartz S; Vanlangendock R; Skenazy J; Landman J
    J Urol; 2006 Jul; 176(1):137-41. PubMed ID: 16753388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Durability of the next-generation flexible fiberoptic ureteroscopes: a randomized prospective multi-institutional clinical trial.
    Knudsen B; Miyaoka R; Shah K; Holden T; Turk TM; Pedro RN; Kriedberg C; Hinck B; Ortiz-Alvarado O; Monga M
    Urology; 2010 Mar; 75(3):534-8. PubMed ID: 19854494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Single use versus reusable digital flexible ureteroscopes: A prospective comparative study.
    Kam J; Yuminaga Y; Beattie K; Ling KY; Arianayagam M; Canagasingham B; Ferguson R; Varol C; Khadra M; Winter M; Ko R
    Int J Urol; 2019 Oct; 26(10):999-1005. PubMed ID: 31448473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Outcomes of flexible ureterorenoscopy and laser fragmentation for renal stones: comparison between digital and conventional ureteroscope.
    Somani BK; Al-Qahtani SM; de Medina SD; Traxer O
    Urology; 2013 Nov; 82(5):1017-9. PubMed ID: 24001703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparing the Efficacy of a Multimodular Flexible Ureteroscope With Its Conventional Counterpart in the Management of Renal Stones.
    Ding J; Xu D; Cao Q; Huang T; Zhu Y; Huang K; Chen Y; Liang C; Qi J; Huang Y
    Urology; 2015 Aug; 86(2):224-9. PubMed ID: 26169008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Performance and durability of leading flexible ureteroscopes.
    User HM; Hua V; Blunt LW; Wambi C; Gonzalez CM; Nadler RB
    J Endourol; 2004 Oct; 18(8):735-8. PubMed ID: 15659893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Intrarenal manipulation of flexible ureteroscopes: a comparative study.
    Monga M; Weiland D; Pedro RN; Lynch AC; Anderson K
    BJU Int; 2007 Jul; 100(1):157-9. PubMed ID: 17552963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The new digital flexible ureteroscopes: 'size does matter'--increased ureteric access sheath use!
    Bach C; Nesar S; Kumar P; Goyal A; Kachrilas S; Papatsoris A; Masood J; Buchholz N
    Urol Int; 2012; 89(4):408-11. PubMed ID: 22964494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Single-Use Versus Reusable Digital Flexible Ureteroscopes for the Treatment of Renal Calculi: A Prospective Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Qi S; Yang E; Bao J; Yang N; Guo H; Wang G; Li N; Cui X; Gao W; Ou T; Wang J; Wang Z; Niu Y
    J Endourol; 2020 Jan; 34(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 31432716
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cost Analysis of Flexible Ureteroscope Repairs: Evaluation of 655 Procedures in a Community-Based Practice.
    Kramolowsky E; McDowell Z; Moore B; Booth B; Wood N
    J Endourol; 2016 Mar; 30(3):254-6. PubMed ID: 26542761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A new era: performance and limitations of the latest models of flexible ureteroscopes.
    Multescu R; Geavlete B; Geavlete P
    Urology; 2013 Dec; 82(6):1236-9. PubMed ID: 23992972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of flexible ureteroscopes: deflection, irrigant flow and optical characteristics.
    Abdelshehid C; Ahlering MT; Chou D; Park HK; Basillote J; Lee D; Kim I; Eichel L; Protsenko D; Wong B; McDougall E; Clayman RV
    J Urol; 2005 Jun; 173(6):2017-21. PubMed ID: 15879808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In vitro comparison of a disposable flexible ureteroscope and conventional flexible ureteroscopes.
    Boylu U; Oommen M; Thomas R; Lee BR
    J Urol; 2009 Nov; 182(5):2347-51. PubMed ID: 19758626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of the mechanical, flow, and optical properties of contemporary flexible ureteroscopes.
    Chiu KY; Cai Y; Marcovich R; El-Hakim A; Smith AD; Lee BR
    Urology; 2003 Nov; 62(5):800-4. PubMed ID: 14624897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of Flexible Ureteroscope Performance between Reusable and Single-Use Models.
    Bragaru M; Multescu R; Geavlete P; Popescu R; Geavlete B
    J Clin Med; 2023 Jan; 12(3):. PubMed ID: 36769740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Single-use disposable digital flexible ureteroscopes: an ex vivo assessment and cost analysis.
    Hennessey DB; Fojecki GL; Papa NP; Lawrentschuk N; Bolton D
    BJU Int; 2018 May; 121 Suppl 3():55-61. PubMed ID: 29656467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Which Flexible Ureteroscopes (Digital vs. Fiber-Optic) Can Easily Reach the Difficult Lower Pole Calices and Have Better End-Tip Deflection: In Vitro Study on K-Box. A PETRA Evaluation.
    Dragos LB; Somani BK; Sener ET; Buttice S; Proietti S; Ploumidis A; Iacoboaie CT; Doizi S; Traxer O
    J Endourol; 2017 Jul; 31(7):630-637. PubMed ID: 28478744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical utility of dual active deflection flexible ureteroscope during upper tract ureteropyeloscopy.
    Ankem MK; Lowry PS; Slovick RW; Munoz del Rio A; Nakada SY
    Urology; 2004 Sep; 64(3):430-4. PubMed ID: 15351558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Micro-Costing Analysis Demonstrates Comparable Costs for LithoVue Compared to Reusable Flexible Fiberoptic Ureteroscopes.
    Taguchi K; Usawachintachit M; Tzou DT; Sherer BA; Metzler I; Isaacson D; Stoller ML; Chi T
    J Endourol; 2018 Apr; 32(4):267-273. PubMed ID: 29239227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.