These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
1970 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25711274)
61. Diagnostic accuracy of simultaneous evaluation of coronary arteries and myocardial perfusion with single stress cardiac computed tomography acquisition compared to invasive coronary angiography plus invasive fractional flow reserve. Pontone G; Baggiano A; Andreini D; Guaricci AI; Guglielmo M; Muscogiuri G; Fusini L; Soldi M; Del Torto A; Mushtaq S; Conte E; Calligaris G; De Martini S; Ferrari C; Galli S; Grancini L; Olivares P; Ravagnani P; Teruzzi G; Trabattoni D; Fabbiocchi F; Montorsi P; Rabbat MG; Bartorelli AL; Pepi M Int J Cardiol; 2018 Dec; 273():263-268. PubMed ID: 30268383 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Comparative utility of gated myocardial perfusion imaging and transthoracic coronary flow reserve for the assessment of coronary artery disease in patients with left bundle branch block. Pavlovic S; Sobic-Saranovic D; Djordjevic-Dikic A; Beleslin B; Stepanovic J; Artiko V; Giga V; Petrasinovic Z; Ostojic M; Vujisic-Tesic B; Obradovic V Nucl Med Commun; 2010 Apr; 31(4):334-40. PubMed ID: 20042989 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Rest-Only Myocardial CT Perfusion in Acute Chest Pain. Thomas DM; Larson CW; Cheezum MK; Villines TC; Branch KR; Blankstein R; Cury RC; Slim AM South Med J; 2015 Nov; 108(11):688-94. PubMed ID: 26539951 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Cardiac magnetic resonance perfusion imaging for the functional assessment of coronary artery disease: a comparison with coronary angiography and fractional flow reserve. Rieber J; Huber A; Erhard I; Mueller S; Schweyer M; Koenig A; Schiele TM; Theisen K; Siebert U; Schoenberg SO; Reiser M; Klauss V Eur Heart J; 2006 Jun; 27(12):1465-71. PubMed ID: 16720685 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Multicenter evaluation of dynamic three-dimensional magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging for the detection of coronary artery disease defined by fractional flow reserve. Manka R; Wissmann L; Gebker R; Jogiya R; Motwani M; Frick M; Reinartz S; Schnackenburg B; Niemann M; Gotschy A; Kuhl C; Nagel E; Fleck E; Marx N; Luescher TF; Plein S; Kozerke S Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 May; 8(5):. PubMed ID: 25901043 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Quantitative assessment of myocardial blood flow in coronary artery disease by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: comparison of Fermi and distributed parameter modeling against invasive methods. Papanastasiou G; Williams MC; Dweck MR; Alam S; Cooper A; Mirsadraee S; Newby DE; Semple SI J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2016 Sep; 18(1):57. PubMed ID: 27624746 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Diffuse coronary artery disease among other atherosclerotic plaque characteristics by coronary computed tomography angiography for predicting coronary vessel-specific ischemia by fractional flow reserve. Rizvi A; Hartaigh BÓ; Danad I; Han D; Lee JH; Gransar H; Szymonifka J; Lin FY; Min JK Atherosclerosis; 2017 Mar; 258():145-151. PubMed ID: 28168977 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Combined coronary angiography and myocardial perfusion by computed tomography in the identification of flow-limiting stenosis - The CORE320 study: An integrated analysis of CT coronary angiography and myocardial perfusion. Magalhães TA; Kishi S; George RT; Arbab-Zadeh A; Vavere AL; Cox C; Matheson MB; Miller JM; Brinker J; Di Carli M; Rybicki FJ; Rochitte CE; Clouse ME; Lima JA J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2015; 9(5):438-45. PubMed ID: 25977111 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive testing: necessary but insufficient. Douglas PS; Daubert MA Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Mar; 8(3):. PubMed ID: 25711276 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
70. Diagnostic performance of noninvasive myocardial perfusion imaging using single-photon emission computed tomography, cardiac magnetic resonance, and positron emission tomography imaging for the detection of obstructive coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis. Jaarsma C; Leiner T; Bekkers SC; Crijns HJ; Wildberger JE; Nagel E; Nelemans PJ; Schalla S J Am Coll Cardiol; 2012 May; 59(19):1719-28. PubMed ID: 22554604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Effect of Coronary Atherosclerosis and Myocardial Ischemia on Plasma Levels of High-Sensitivity Troponin T and NT-proBNP in Patients With Stable Angina. Caselli C; Prontera C; Liga R; De Graaf MA; Gaemperli O; Lorenzoni V; Ragusa R; Marinelli M; Del Ry S; Rovai D; Giannessi D; Aguade-Bruix S; Clemente A; Bax JJ; Lombardi M; Sicari R; Zamorano J; Scholte AJ; Kaufmann PA; Knuuti J; Underwood SR; Clerico A; Neglia D Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol; 2016 Apr; 36(4):757-64. PubMed ID: 26868212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: an evidence-based analysis. Medical Advisory Secretariat Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2010; 10(12):1-38. PubMed ID: 23074389 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Multicentre multi-device hybrid imaging study of coronary artery disease: results from the EValuation of INtegrated Cardiac Imaging for the Detection and Characterization of Ischaemic Heart Disease (EVINCI) hybrid imaging population. Liga R; Vontobel J; Rovai D; Marinelli M; Caselli C; Pietila M; Teresinska A; Aguadé-Bruix S; Pizzi MN; Todiere G; Gimelli A; Chiappino D; Marraccini P; Schroeder S; Drosch T; Poddighe R; Casolo G; Anagnostopoulos C; Pugliese F; Rouzet F; Le Guludec D; Cappelli F; Valente S; Gensini GF; Zawaideh C; Capitanio S; Sambuceti G; Marsico F; Filardi PP; Fernández-Golfín C; Rincón LM; Graner FP; de Graaf MA; Stehli J; Reyes E; Nkomo S; Mäki M; Lorenzoni V; Turchetti G; Carpeggiani C; Puzzuoli S; Mangione M; Marcheschi P; Giannessi D; Nekolla S; Lombardi M; Sicari R; Scholte AJ; Zamorano JL; Underwood SR; Knuuti J; Kaufmann PA; Neglia D; Gaemperli O; Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Sep; 17(9):951-60. PubMed ID: 26992419 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Integrating CT Myocardial Perfusion and CT-FFR in the Work-Up of Coronary Artery Disease. Coenen A; Rossi A; Lubbers MM; Kurata A; Kono AK; Chelu RG; Segreto S; Dijkshoorn ML; Wragg A; van Geuns RM; Pugliese F; Nieman K JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Jul; 10(7):760-770. PubMed ID: 28109933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Exploring Coronary Circulatory Response to Stenosis and Its Association With Invasive Physiologic Indexes Using Absolute Myocardial Blood Flow and Coronary Pressure. Lee JM; Hwang D; Park J; Zhang J; Tong Y; Kim CH; Bang JI; Suh M; Paeng JC; Cheon GJ; Koo BK Circulation; 2017 Nov; 136(19):1798-1808. PubMed ID: 28851731 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Whole-heart dynamic three-dimensional magnetic resonance perfusion imaging for the detection of coronary artery disease defined by fractional flow reserve: determination of volumetric myocardial ischaemic burden and coronary lesion location. Manka R; Paetsch I; Kozerke S; Moccetti M; Hoffmann R; Schroeder J; Reith S; Schnackenburg B; Gaemperli O; Wissmann L; Wyss CA; Kaufmann PA; Corti R; Boesiger P; Marx N; Lüscher TF; Jahnke C Eur Heart J; 2012 Aug; 33(16):2016-24. PubMed ID: 22677136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Patient management after noninvasive cardiac imaging results from SPARC (Study of myocardial perfusion and coronary anatomy imaging roles in coronary artery disease). Hachamovitch R; Nutter B; Hlatky MA; Shaw LJ; Ridner ML; Dorbala S; Beanlands RS; Chow BJ; Branscomb E; Chareonthaitawee P; Weigold WG; Voros S; Abbara S; Yasuda T; Jacobs JE; Lesser J; Berman DS; Thomson LE; Raman S; Heller GV; Schussheim A; Brunken R; Williams KA; Farkas S; Delbeke D; Schoepf UJ; Reichek N; Rabinowitz S; Sigman SR; Patterson R; Corn CR; White R; Kazerooni E; Corbett J; Bokhari S; Machac J; Guarneri E; Borges-Neto S; Millstine JW; Caldwell J; Arrighi J; Hoffmann U; Budoff M; Lima J; Johnson JR; Johnson B; Gaber M; Williams JA; Foster C; Hainer J; Di Carli MF; J Am Coll Cardiol; 2012 Jan; 59(5):462-74. PubMed ID: 22281249 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Qualitative assessments of myocardial ischemia by cardiac MRI and coronary stenosis by invasive coronary angiography in relation to quantitative perfusion by positron emission tomography in patients with known or suspected stable coronary artery disease. Akil S; Hedeer F; Carlsson M; Arheden H; Oddstig J; Hindorf C; Jögi J; Erlinge D; Engblom H J Nucl Cardiol; 2020 Dec; 27(6):2351-2359. PubMed ID: 30535919 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Computed tomography angiography and perfusion to assess coronary artery stenosis causing perfusion defects by single photon emission computed tomography: the CORE320 study. Rochitte CE; George RT; Chen MY; Arbab-Zadeh A; Dewey M; Miller JM; Niinuma H; Yoshioka K; Kitagawa K; Nakamori S; Laham R; Vavere AL; Cerci RJ; Mehra VC; Nomura C; Kofoed KF; Jinzaki M; Kuribayashi S; de Roos A; Laule M; Tan SY; Hoe J; Paul N; Rybicki FJ; Brinker JA; Arai AE; Cox C; Clouse ME; Di Carli MF; Lima JA Eur Heart J; 2014 May; 35(17):1120-30. PubMed ID: 24255127 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. Computed tomography angiography and myocardial computed tomography perfusion in patients with coronary stents: prospective intraindividual comparison with conventional coronary angiography. Rief M; Zimmermann E; Stenzel F; Martus P; Stangl K; Greupner J; Knebel F; Kranz A; Schlattmann P; Laule M; Dewey M J Am Coll Cardiol; 2013 Oct; 62(16):1476-85. PubMed ID: 23792193 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]