810 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25713430)
1. Triple-modality screening trial for familial breast cancer underlines the importance of magnetic resonance imaging and questions the role of mammography and ultrasound regardless of patient mutation status, age, and breast density.
Riedl CC; Luft N; Bernhart C; Weber M; Bernathova M; Tea MK; Rudas M; Singer CF; Helbich TH
J Clin Oncol; 2015 Apr; 33(10):1128-35. PubMed ID: 25713430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The supplemental value of mammographic screening over breast MRI alone in BRCA2 mutation carriers.
Obdeijn IM; Mann RM; Loo CCE; Lobbes M; Voormolen EMC; van Deurzen CHM; de Bock G; ; Hooning MJ
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2020 Jun; 181(3):581-588. PubMed ID: 32333294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Breast cancer detection and tumor characteristics in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers.
Krammer J; Pinker-Domenig K; Robson ME; Gönen M; Bernard-Davila B; Morris EA; Mangino DA; Jochelson MS
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Jun; 163(3):565-571. PubMed ID: 28343309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The added value of mammography in different age-groups of women with and without BRCA mutation screened with breast MRI.
Vreemann S; van Zelst JCM; Schlooz-Vries M; Bult P; Hoogerbrugge N; Karssemeijer N; Gubern-Mérida A; Mann RM
Breast Cancer Res; 2018 Aug; 20(1):84. PubMed ID: 30075794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Surveillance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers with magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, mammography, and clinical breast examination.
Warner E; Plewes DB; Hill KA; Causer PA; Zubovits JT; Jong RA; Cutrara MR; DeBoer G; Yaffe MJ; Messner SJ; Meschino WS; Piron CA; Narod SA
JAMA; 2004 Sep; 292(11):1317-25. PubMed ID: 15367553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Magnetic resonance imaging improves breast screening sensitivity in BRCA mutation carriers age ≥ 50 years: evidence from an individual patient data meta-analysis.
Phi XA; Houssami N; Obdeijn IM; Warner E; Sardanelli F; Leach MO; Riedl CC; Trop I; Tilanus-Linthorst MM; Mandel R; Santoro F; Kwan-Lim G; Helbich TH; de Koning HJ; Van den Heuvel ER; de Bock GH
J Clin Oncol; 2015 Feb; 33(4):349-56. PubMed ID: 25534390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Improvement in DCIS detection rates by MRI over time in a high-risk breast screening study.
Warner E; Causer PA; Wong JW; Wright FC; Jong RA; Hill KA; Messner SJ; Yaffe MJ; Narod SA; Plewes DB
Breast J; 2011; 17(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 21251121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effectiveness of screening with annual magnetic resonance imaging and mammography: results of the initial screen from the ontario high risk breast screening program.
Chiarelli AM; Prummel MV; Muradali D; Majpruz V; Horgan M; Carroll JC; Eisen A; Meschino WS; Shumak RS; Warner E; Rabeneck L
J Clin Oncol; 2014 Jul; 32(21):2224-30. PubMed ID: 24934793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. MRI versus mammography for breast cancer screening in women with familial risk (FaMRIsc): a multicentre, randomised, controlled trial.
Saadatmand S; Geuzinge HA; Rutgers EJT; Mann RM; de Roy van Zuidewijn DBW; Zonderland HM; Tollenaar RAEM; Lobbes MBI; Ausems MGEM; van 't Riet M; Hooning MJ; Mares-Engelberts I; Luiten EJT; Heijnsdijk EAM; Verhoef C; Karssemeijer N; Oosterwijk JC; Obdeijn IM; de Koning HJ; Tilanus-Linthorst MMA;
Lancet Oncol; 2019 Aug; 20(8):1136-1147. PubMed ID: 31221620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. MRI breast screening in high-risk women: cancer detection and survival analysis.
Evans DG; Kesavan N; Lim Y; Gadde S; Hurley E; Massat NJ; Maxwell AJ; Ingham S; Eeles R; Leach MO; ; Howell A; Duffy SW
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2014 Jun; 145(3):663-72. PubMed ID: 24687378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mammography, breast ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging for surveillance of women at high familial risk for breast cancer.
Kuhl CK; Schrading S; Leutner CC; Morakkabati-Spitz N; Wardelmann E; Fimmers R; Kuhn W; Schild HH
J Clin Oncol; 2005 Nov; 23(33):8469-76. PubMed ID: 16293877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prospective blinded surveillance screening of Swedish women with increased hereditary risk of breast cancer.
Liljegren A; von Wachenfeldt A; Azavedo E; Eloranta S; Grundström H; Ståhlbom AK; Sundbom A; Sundén P; Svane G; Ulitzsch D; Arver B
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2018 Apr; 168(3):655-666. PubMed ID: 29318406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Abnormal Findings Detected by Multi-modality Breast Imaging and Biopsy Results in a High-risk Clinic.
Laitman Y; Feldman DM; Sklair-Levy M; Yosepovich A; Barshack-Nakar I; Brodsky M; Halshtok O; Shalmon A; Gotlieb M; Friedman E
Clin Breast Cancer; 2018 Aug; 18(4):e695-e698. PubMed ID: 29292184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Surveillance of Women with the BRCA1 or BRCA2 Mutation by Using Biannual Automated Breast US, MR Imaging, and Mammography.
van Zelst JCM; Mus RDM; Woldringh G; Rutten MJCM; Bult P; Vreemann S; de Jong M; Karssemeijer N; Hoogerbrugge N; Mann RM
Radiology; 2017 Nov; 285(2):376-388. PubMed ID: 28609204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Intensive Surveillance with Biannual Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Downstages Breast Cancer in
Guindalini RSC; Zheng Y; Abe H; Whitaker K; Yoshimatsu TF; Walsh T; Schacht D; Kulkarni K; Sheth D; Verp MS; Bradbury AR; Churpek J; Obeid E; Mueller J; Khramtsova G; Liu F; Raoul A; Cao H; Romero IL; Hong S; Livingston R; Jaskowiak N; Wang X; Debiasi M; Pritchard CC; King MC; Karczmar G; Newstead GM; Huo D; Olopade OI
Clin Cancer Res; 2019 Mar; 25(6):1786-1794. PubMed ID: 30154229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prospective multicenter cohort study to refine management recommendations for women at elevated familial risk of breast cancer: the EVA trial.
Kuhl C; Weigel S; Schrading S; Arand B; Bieling H; König R; Tombach B; Leutner C; Rieber-Brambs A; Nordhoff D; Heindel W; Reiser M; Schild HH
J Clin Oncol; 2010 Mar; 28(9):1450-7. PubMed ID: 20177029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast improves detection of invasive cancer, preinvasive cancer, and premalignant lesions during surveillance of women at high risk for breast cancer.
Riedl CC; Ponhold L; Flöry D; Weber M; Kroiss R; Wagner T; Fuchsjäger M; Helbich TH
Clin Cancer Res; 2007 Oct; 13(20):6144-52. PubMed ID: 17947480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Screening with magnetic resonance imaging and mammography of a UK population at high familial risk of breast cancer: a prospective multicentre cohort study (MARIBS).
Leach MO; Boggis CR; Dixon AK; Easton DF; Eeles RA; Evans DG; Gilbert FJ; Griebsch I; Hoff RJ; Kessar P; Lakhani SR; Moss SM; Nerurkar A; Padhani AR; Pointon LJ; Thompson D; Warren RM;
Lancet; 2005 May 21-27; 365(9473):1769-78. PubMed ID: 15910949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Multicenter surveillance of women at high genetic breast cancer risk using mammography, ultrasonography, and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (the high breast cancer risk italian 1 study): final results.
Sardanelli F; Podo F; Santoro F; Manoukian S; Bergonzi S; Trecate G; Vergnaghi D; Federico M; Cortesi L; Corcione S; Morassut S; Di Maggio C; Cilotti A; Martincich L; Calabrese M; Zuiani C; Preda L; Bonanni B; Carbonaro LA; Contegiacomo A; Panizza P; Di Cesare E; Savarese A; Crecco M; Turchetti D; Tonutti M; Belli P; Maschio AD;
Invest Radiol; 2011 Feb; 46(2):94-105. PubMed ID: 21139507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessment of false-negative cases of breast MR imaging in women with a familial or genetic predisposition.
Obdeijn IM; Loo CE; Rijnsburger AJ; Wasser MN; Bergers E; Kok T; Klijn JG; Boetes C
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2010 Jan; 119(2):399-407. PubMed ID: 19876732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
