These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25713553)

  • 1. Automaticity revisited: when print doesn't activate semantics.
    Labuschagne EM; Besner D
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():117. PubMed ID: 25713553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. On the relationship between spatial attention and semantics in the context of a Stroop paradigm.
    Besner D; Young T
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38886301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Is semantic activation from print capacity limited? Evidence from the psychological refractory period paradigm.
    Besner D; Reynolds M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Jun; 24(3):907-913. PubMed ID: 27812959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Single letter coloring and spatial cuing eliminates a semantic contribution to the Stroop effect.
    Manwell LA; Roberts MA; Besner D
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2004 Jun; 11(3):458-62. PubMed ID: 15376795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Activation of lexical and semantic representations without intention along GPC-sublexical and orthographic-lexical reading pathways in a Stroop paradigm.
    Anton KF; Gould L; Borowsky R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 May; 40(3):623-44. PubMed ID: 24294918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Disentangling Genuine Semantic Stroop Effects in Reading from Contingency Effects: On the Need for Two Neutral Baselines.
    Lorentz E; McKibben T; Ekstrand C; Gould L; Anton K; Borowsky R
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():386. PubMed ID: 27014177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Coloring only a single letter does not eliminate color-word interference in a vocal-response Stroop task: automaticity revealed.
    Marmurek HH
    J Gen Psychol; 2003 Apr; 130(2):207-24. PubMed ID: 12773021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Semantic information mediates visual attention during spoken word recognition in Chinese: Evidence from the printed-word version of the visual-world paradigm.
    Shen W; Qu Q; Li X
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Jul; 78(5):1267-84. PubMed ID: 26993126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Unconsciously controlled processing: the Stroop effect reconsidered.
    Besner D; Stolz JA
    Psychon Bull Rev; 1999 Sep; 6(3):449-55. PubMed ID: 12198783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Word-based grouping affects the prime-task effect on semantic priming.
    Marí-Beffa P; Houghton G; Estévez AF; Fuentes LJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2000 Apr; 26(2):469-79. PubMed ID: 10811157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Modulating semantic feedback in visual word recognition.
    Smith MC; Besner D
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2001 Mar; 8(1):111-7. PubMed ID: 11340855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Social priming of dyslexia and reduction of the Stroop effect: what component of the Stroop effect is actually reduced?
    Augustinova M; Ferrand L
    Cognition; 2014 Mar; 130(3):442-54. PubMed ID: 24387881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Automatic processes in lexical access and spreading activation.
    Friedrich FJ; Henik A; Tzelgov J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1991 Aug; 17(3):792-806. PubMed ID: 1834791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A position-sensitive Stroop effect: further evidence for a left-to-right component in print-to-speech conversion.
    Coltheart M; Woollams A; Kinoshita S; Perry C
    Psychon Bull Rev; 1999 Sep; 6(3):456-63. PubMed ID: 12198784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The semantic Stroop effect: An ex-Gaussian analysis.
    White D; Risko EF; Besner D
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Oct; 23(5):1576-1581. PubMed ID: 26907601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Basic processes in reading: can functional phonological recoding be blocked?
    Ferguson R; Besner D
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2006 Jun; 60(2):148-58. PubMed ID: 17133889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Attentional constraints on semantic activation: Evidence from Stroop's paradigm.
    White D; Besner D
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Sep; 189():4-11. PubMed ID: 27594342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. ERP analyses of task effects on semantic processing from words.
    Marí-Beffa P; Valdés B; Cullen DJ; Catena A; Houghton G
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 May; 23(2-3):293-305. PubMed ID: 15820637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. On the interaction between linguistic and pictorial systems in the absence of semantic mediation: evidence from a priming paradigm.
    Smith MC; Meiran N; Besner D
    Mem Cognit; 2000 Mar; 28(2):204-13. PubMed ID: 10790976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. When are morphemic and semantic priming observed in visual word recognition?
    Macnevin C; Besner D
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2002 Jun; 56(2):112-9. PubMed ID: 12066419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.