BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25713854)

  • 1. UCL geneticist faces questions over image duplication.
    Owens B
    Lancet; 2015 Feb; 385(9968):593. PubMed ID: 25713854
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Researchers have finally created a tool to spot duplicated images across thousands of papers.
    Butler D
    Nature; 2018 Mar; 555(7694):18. PubMed ID: 29493609
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Retractions in the scientific literature: do authors deliberately commit research fraud?
    Steen RG
    J Med Ethics; 2011 Feb; 37(2):113-7. PubMed ID: 21081306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Spoof research paper is accepted by 157 journals.
    Hawkes N
    BMJ; 2013 Oct; 347():f5975. PubMed ID: 24096966
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Give every paper a read for reproducibility.
    Winchester C
    Nature; 2018 May; 557(7705):281. PubMed ID: 29769684
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Meet this super-spotter of duplicated images in science papers.
    Shen H
    Nature; 2020 May; 581(7807):132-136. PubMed ID: 32405024
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. US genome chief withdraws five papers over fraud.
    Greenberg DS
    Lancet; 1996 Nov; 348(9037):1303. PubMed ID: 11654532
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Falsified data found in gene studies: fraud leads scientist to withdraw research papers on leukemia.
    Altman LK
    N Y Times Web; 1996 Oct; ():A12. PubMed ID: 11647162
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Korean cloning scientist quits over report he faked research; backers of stem cell work fear larger setback.
    Sang-Hun C; Wade N
    N Y Times Web; 2005 Dec; ():A1, A6. PubMed ID: 16450468
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Report finds massive fraud at Dutch universities.
    Callaway E
    Nature; 2011 Nov; 479(7371):15. PubMed ID: 22051650
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Scientific misconduct. Retractions put spotlight on China's part-time professor system.
    Xin H
    Science; 2009 Mar; 323(5919):1280-1. PubMed ID: 19264995
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Copy and paste.
    Nature; 2011 May; 473(7348):419-20. PubMed ID: 21614031
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Research ethics: Zero tolerance.
    Cyranoski D
    Nature; 2012 Jan; 481(7380):134-6. PubMed ID: 22237090
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. King's College London's enquiry into Hans J Eysenck's 'Unsafe' publications must be properly completed.
    Marks DF; Buchanan RD
    J Health Psychol; 2020 Jan; 25(1):3-6. PubMed ID: 31841048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Retracted papers damage work on DNA repair.
    Check E
    Nature; 2005 Jun; 435(7045):1015. PubMed ID: 15973373
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How an Indian dental school climbed the ranks.
    Joelving F;
    Science; 2023 Jun; 380(6649):1000-1001. PubMed ID: 37289867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A major failure of scientific governance.
    Smith R; Godlee F
    BMJ; 2015 Oct; 351():h5694. PubMed ID: 26514391
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Harvard probe kept under wraps.
    Ledford H
    Nature; 2010 Aug; 466(7309):908-9. PubMed ID: 20725008
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cognition research. Investigation leaves field in the dark about a colleague's work.
    Miller G
    Science; 2010 Aug; 329(5994):890-1. PubMed ID: 20724607
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Universite de MontrĂ©al in the dark about fraud.
    Kondro W
    CMAJ; 2005 May; 172(10):1278. PubMed ID: 15883394
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.