223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25714302)
1. The clinical impact of gynecologic MRI.
Ratner ES; Staib LH; Cross SN; Raji R; Schwartz PE; McCarthy SM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Mar; 204(3):674-80. PubMed ID: 25714302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Computed tomographic and magnetic resonance features of gynecologic abnormalities in women presenting with acute or chronic abdominal pain.
Kalish GM; Patel MD; Gunn ML; Dubinsky TJ
Ultrasound Q; 2007 Sep; 23(3):167-75. PubMed ID: 17805165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Are too many imaging tests being performed in women with an adnexal mass?
Kupets R; Fernandes K; Miroshnichenko G; Paszat L
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2013 Mar; 35(3):246-251. PubMed ID: 23470112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. MR imaging of the female pelvis: current perspectives and review of genital tract congenital anomalies, and benign and malignant diseases.
Patel VH; Somers S
Crit Rev Diagn Imaging; 1997 Oct; 38(5):417-99. PubMed ID: 9391749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ultrasound and the pelvic mass.
Voss SC; Lacey CG; Pupkin M; Degefu S
J Reprod Med; 1983 Dec; 28(12):833-7. PubMed ID: 6229631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Indeterminate liver and renal lesions: comparison of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in providing a definitive diagnosis and impact on recommendations for additional imaging.
Margolis NE; Shaver CM; Rosenkrantz AB
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2013; 37(6):882-6. PubMed ID: 24270109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Abdominal imaging studies: comparison of diagnostic accuracies resulting from ultrasound, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging in the same individual.
Noone TC; Semelka RC; Chaney DM; Reinhold C
Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Jan; 22(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 14972390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cross-sectional imaging of the pelvic tumors and tumor-like lesions in gynecologic patients-misinterpretation points and differential diagnosis.
Padovan RS; Kralik M; Prutki M; Hrabak M; Oberman B; Potocki K
Clin Imaging; 2008; 32(4):296-302. PubMed ID: 18603185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Diagnosis of gynecologic diseases].
Kasbarian M; Bartoli JM; Moulin G; Bernard Y; Blanc B
Rev Prat; 1989 Mar; 39(9):771-5. PubMed ID: 2660240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prospective comparison of ultrasound and computed tomography in the evaluation of gynecologic pelvic masses.
Walsh JW; Rosenfield AT; Jaffe CC; Schwartz PE; Simeone J; Dembner AG; Taylor KJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1978 Dec; 131(6):955-60. PubMed ID: 104597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Gynecologic applications of MRI.
McCarthy S
Crit Rev Diagn Imaging; 1990; 31(2):263-81. PubMed ID: 2288664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diagnostic imaging in gynecologic malignancy.
Bhosale P; Iyer R
Minerva Ginecol; 2008 Apr; 60(2):143-54. PubMed ID: 18487965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diagnostic value of magnetic resonance imaging in gynaecology.
Acar B; Posaci C; Dicle O; Topuz A; Erten O
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1992 Aug; 32(3):252-5. PubMed ID: 1445140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Results of a prospective study with comparison of clinical, endosonographic, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and pathologic staging of advanced gynecologic carcinoma and recurrence.
Houvenaeghel G; Delpero JR; Rosello R; Resbeut M; Viens P; Jacquemier J; Noirclerc M; Guerinel G
Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1993 Sep; 177(3):231-6. PubMed ID: 8356495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. MR evaluation of clinically suspected adnexal masses.
Scoutt LM; McCarthy SM; Lange R; Bourque A; Schwartz PE
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1994; 18(4):609-18. PubMed ID: 8040448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Significance of digital three-dimensional reconstruction techniques in the diagnosis of pelvic mass].
Chen L; Chen C; Liu P; Tang L; Duan H; Wang J; Chen R; Chen B; Wang J; Li W; Zhong S
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2014 Feb; 49(2):94-9. PubMed ID: 24739639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Role of X-ray CT and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of gynecological malignant tumor].
Suzuki M
Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Aug; 41(8):942-52. PubMed ID: 2809344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Utility of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Evaluation of Intraoperatively Confirmed Pelvic Adhesions.
Macer ML; Mathur M; Spektor M; Gysler S; Staib L; Kodaman P; McCarthy S
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2015; 39(6):896-900. PubMed ID: 26466105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Simulated impact of pelvic MRI in treatment planning for pediatric adnexal masses.
Marro A; Allen LM; Kives SL; Moineddin R; Chavhan GB
Pediatr Radiol; 2016 Aug; 46(9):1249-57. PubMed ID: 27097921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Gynecologic causes of acute pelvic pain: spectrum of CT findings.
Bennett GL; Slywotzky CM; Giovanniello G
Radiographics; 2002; 22(4):785-801. PubMed ID: 12110710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
