BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25714302)

  • 21. [Ultrasonography in acute pelvic pain].
    Kupesić S; Aksamija A; Vucić N; Tripalo A; Kurjak A
    Acta Med Croatica; 2002; 56(4-5):171-80. PubMed ID: 12768897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Ultrasound evaluation of gynecologic causes of pelvic pain.
    Cicchiello LA; Hamper UM; Scoutt LM
    Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 2011 Mar; 38(1):85-114, viii. PubMed ID: 21419329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Contemporary pediatric gynecologic imaging.
    Servaes S; Victoria T; Lovrenski J; Epelman M
    Semin Ultrasound CT MR; 2010 Apr; 31(2):116-40. PubMed ID: 20304321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Origin, Incidence, and Management of Nongynecologic Pelvic Masses Seen on Cross-sectional Imaging.
    Dotters-Katz SK; James AH; Gardner C; Grotegut C; Colton K; Jaffe TA
    J Reprod Med; 2015; 60(5-6):187-93. PubMed ID: 26126302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Diagnoses after laparotomy for a mass in the pelvic area in women.
    Lin JY; Angel C; DuBeshter B; Walsh CJ
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1993 Apr; 176(4):333-8. PubMed ID: 8460408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. CT, MRI, PET, PET/CT, and ultrasound in the evaluation of obstetric and gynecologic patients.
    Gjelsteen AC; Ching BH; Meyermann MW; Prager DA; Murphy TF; Berkey BD; Mitchell LA
    Surg Clin North Am; 2008 Apr; 88(2):361-90, vii. PubMed ID: 18381118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Detection of pelvic lymph node metastases in gynecologic malignancy: a comparison of CT, MR imaging, and positron emission tomography.
    Williams AD; Cousins C; Soutter WP; Mubashar M; Peters AM; Dina R; Fuchsel F; McIndoe GA; deSouza NM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Aug; 177(2):343-8. PubMed ID: 11461859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in severe pelvic endometriosis.
    Dumontier I; Roseau G; Vincent B; Chapron C; Dousset B; Chaussade S; Moreau JF; Dubuisson JB; Couturier D
    Gastroenterol Clin Biol; 2000 Dec; 24(12):1197-204. PubMed ID: 11173733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [CT and MR imaging of gynecological emergency disease].
    Fujii S; Kinoshita T; Tahara T; Matsusue E; Ogawa T
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 2004 Nov; 64(8):533-43. PubMed ID: 15651358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Ultrasonography evaluation of pelvic masses.
    Chu LC; Coquia SF; Hamper UM
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2014 Nov; 52(6):1237-52. PubMed ID: 25444103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Advances in gynecologic imaging and intervention.
    Binkovitz LA; King BF; Corfman RS
    Mayo Clin Proc; 1991 Nov; 66(11):1133-51. PubMed ID: 1943247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Diagnosis and staging of primary ovarian cancer: correlation between PET/CT, Doppler US, and CT or MRI.
    Nam EJ; Yun MJ; Oh YT; Kim JW; Kim JH; Kim S; Jung YW; Kim SW; Kim YT
    Gynecol Oncol; 2010 Mar; 116(3):389-94. PubMed ID: 19926121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The diagnostic accuracy of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT in patients with gynecological malignancies.
    Grisaru D; Almog B; Levine C; Metser U; Fishman A; Lerman H; Lessing JB; Even-Sapir E
    Gynecol Oncol; 2004 Sep; 94(3):680-4. PubMed ID: 15350358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [MRI in gynecology].
    Robert Y; Launay S; Mestdagh P; Moisan S; Boyer C; Rocourt N; Cosson M
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2002 Sep; 31(5):417-39. PubMed ID: 12379827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Gynecologic imaging: current and emerging applications.
    Iyer VR; Lee SI
    J Postgrad Med; 2010; 56(2):117-24. PubMed ID: 20622391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Correlations between magnetic resonance, ultrasonography, and computerized tomography in invasive gynecologic pathology].
    Gualdi GF; Volpe A; Polettini E; D'Agostino A; Ceroni AM; Casciani E
    Clin Ter; 1994 Feb; 144(2):139-46. PubMed ID: 8181208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Ultrasonographic versus clinical evaluation of a pelvic mass.
    Reeves RD; Drake TS; O'Brien WF
    Obstet Gynecol; 1980 May; 55(5):551-4. PubMed ID: 7366913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Dynamic half Fourier acquisition, single shot turbo spin-echo magnetic resonance imaging for evaluating the female pelvis.
    Gousse AE; Barbaric ZL; Safir MH; Madjar S; Marumoto AK; Raz S
    J Urol; 2000 Nov; 164(5):1606-13. PubMed ID: 11025716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. US and CT evaluation of acute pelvic pain of gynecologic origin in nonpregnant premenopausal patients.
    Potter AW; Chandrasekhar CA
    Radiographics; 2008 Oct; 28(6):1645-59. PubMed ID: 18936027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Is ultrasound imaging inferior to computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging in evaluating renal mass size?
    Mucksavage P; Ramchandani P; Malkowicz SB; Guzzo TJ
    Urology; 2012 Jan; 79(1):28-31. PubMed ID: 22202542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.