These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25714746)

  • 1. P300 event-related potential as an indicator of inattentional deafness?
    Giraudet L; St-Louis ME; Scannella S; Causse M
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(2):e0118556. PubMed ID: 25714746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Inattentional deafness to auditory alarms: Inter-individual differences, electrophysiological signature and single trial classification.
    Dehais F; Roy RN; Scannella S
    Behav Brain Res; 2019 Mar; 360():51-59. PubMed ID: 30508609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Inattentional Deafness: Visual Load Leads to Time-Specific Suppression of Auditory Evoked Responses.
    Molloy K; Griffiths TD; Chait M; Lavie N
    J Neurosci; 2015 Dec; 35(49):16046-54. PubMed ID: 26658858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Failure to detect critical auditory alerts in the cockpit: evidence for inattentional deafness.
    Dehais F; Causse M; Vachon F; Régis N; Menant E; Tremblay S
    Hum Factors; 2014 Jun; 56(4):631-44. PubMed ID: 25029890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Disruption in neural phase synchrony is related to identification of inattentional deafness in real-world setting.
    Callan DE; Gateau T; Durantin G; Gonthier N; Dehais F
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2018 Jun; 39(6):2596-2608. PubMed ID: 29484760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Busy and confused? High risk of missed alerts in the cockpit: An electrophysiological study.
    Causse M; Parmentier FBR; Mouratille D; Thibaut D; Kisselenko M; Fabre E
    Brain Res; 2022 Oct; 1793():148035. PubMed ID: 35908589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Auditory Task Irrelevance: A Basis for Inattentional Deafness.
    Scheer M; Bülthoff HH; Chuang LL
    Hum Factors; 2018 May; 60(3):428-440. PubMed ID: 29578754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Role of Cognitive and Perceptual Loads in Inattentional Deafness.
    Causse M; Imbert JP; Giraudet L; Jouffrais C; Tremblay S
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2016; 10():344. PubMed ID: 27458362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Suggested deafness during hypnosis and simulation of hypnosis compared to a distraction and control condition: A study on subjective experience and cortical brain responses.
    Franz M; Schmidt B; Hecht H; Naumann E; Miltner WHR
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(10):e0240832. PubMed ID: 33119665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The neuroergonomic evaluation of human machine interface design in air traffic control using behavioral and EGG/ERP measures.
    Giraudet L; Imbert JP; Bérenger M; Tremblay S; Causse M
    Behav Brain Res; 2015 Nov; 294():246-53. PubMed ID: 26200718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Preattentive cortical-evoked responses to pure tones, harmonic tones, and speech: influence of music training.
    Nikjeh DA; Lister JJ; Frisch SA
    Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):432-46. PubMed ID: 19494778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Neural signature of inattentional deafness.
    Durantin G; Dehais F; Gonthier N; Terzibas C; Callan DE
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2017 Nov; 38(11):5440-5455. PubMed ID: 28744950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
    Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Eye blink rate increases as a function of cognitive load during an auditory oddball paradigm.
    Magliacano A; Fiorenza S; Estraneo A; Trojano L
    Neurosci Lett; 2020 Sep; 736():135293. PubMed ID: 32771601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. High expectancy influences the role of cognitive load in inattentional deafness during landing decision-making.
    Zhu R; Wang Z; Ma X; You X
    Appl Ergon; 2022 Feb; 99():103629. PubMed ID: 34717070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interactions among variables in the P300 response to a continuous performance task.
    Salamat MT; McPherson DL
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1999; 10(7):379-87. PubMed ID: 10949942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Auditory pre-attentive processing of Chinese tones.
    Yang LJ; Cao KL; Wei CG; Liu YZ
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2008 Dec; 121(23):2429-33. PubMed ID: 19102963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An electrophysiological and behavioral investigation of involuntary attention towards auditory frequency, duration and intensity changes.
    Escera C; Corral MJ; Yago E
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2002 Nov; 14(3):325-32. PubMed ID: 12421656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Event related potentials (ERPs) and behavioral responses: comparison of tonal stimuli to speech stimuli in phonological and semantic tasks.
    Geal-Dor M; Kamenir Y; Babkoff H
    J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol; 2005; 16(2-3):139-55. PubMed ID: 16285466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The modulation of auditory novelty processing by working memory load in school age children and adults: a combined behavioral and event-related potential study.
    Ruhnau P; Wetzel N; Widmann A; Schröger E
    BMC Neurosci; 2010 Oct; 11():126. PubMed ID: 20929535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.