These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25714770)
1. [Clipping comparable to coiling in intracranial aneurysm]. Bakker NA; Veeger NJ; van Dijk JM Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2015; 159():A8601. PubMed ID: 25714770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The durability of endovascular coiling versus neurosurgical clipping of ruptured cerebral aneurysms: 18 year follow-up of the UK cohort of the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT). Molyneux AJ; Birks J; Clarke A; Sneade M; Kerr RS Lancet; 2015 Feb; 385(9969):691-7. PubMed ID: 25465111 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Endovascular coiling versus neurosurgical clipping for patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage. van der Schaaf I; Algra A; Wermer M; Molyneux A; Clarke M; van Gijn J; Rinkel G Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2005 Oct; (4):CD003085. PubMed ID: 16235314 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. ISAT: end of the debate on coiling versus clipping? Bakker NA; Veeger NJ; Van Dijk JM Lancet; 2015 Jun; 385(9984):2251. PubMed ID: 26088494 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. ISAT: end of the debate on coiling versus clipping? Korja M Lancet; 2015 Jun; 385(9984):2250-1. PubMed ID: 26088493 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Risk of recurrent subarachnoid haemorrhage, death, or dependence and standardised mortality ratios after clipping or coiling of an intracranial aneurysm in the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT): long-term follow-up. Molyneux AJ; Kerr RS; Birks J; Ramzi N; Yarnold J; Sneade M; Rischmiller J; Lancet Neurol; 2009 May; 8(5):427-33. PubMed ID: 19329361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. International subarachnoid aneurysm trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised comparison of effects on survival, dependency, seizures, rebleeding, subgroups, and aneurysm occlusion. Molyneux AJ; Kerr RS; Yu LM; Clarke M; Sneade M; Yarnold JA; Sandercock P; Lancet; 2005 Sep 3-9; 366(9488):809-17. PubMed ID: 16139655 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Management of ruptured intracranial aneurysms in the post-ISAT era: outcome of surgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in a Singapore tertiary institution. Koh KM; Ng Z; Low SY; Chua HZ; Chou N; Low SW; Yeo TT Singapore Med J; 2013 Jun; 54(6):332-8. PubMed ID: 23820544 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Endovascular coiling versus neurosurgical clipping for ruptured intracranial aneurysms: significant benefits in clinical outcome and reduced consumption of hospital resources in Hong Kong Chinese patients. Yu SC; Wong GK; Wong JK; Poon WS Hong Kong Med J; 2007 Aug; 13(4):271-8. PubMed ID: 17592179 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial II: comparison of clipping vs coiling: key questions. Are the results of the study generalizable? Should clipping be done for patients less than 40 years of age? Ausman JI Surg Neurol; 2008 Jul; 70(1):104-7. PubMed ID: 18589206 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]