438 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25715038)
21. Shaping ability of BioRace, ProTaper NEXT and Genius nickel-titanium instruments in curved canals of mandibular molars: a MicroCT study.
Drukteinis S; Peciuliene V; Dummer PMH; Hupp J
Int Endod J; 2019 Jan; 52(1):86-93. PubMed ID: 29858500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A comparative study of the effects of two nickel-titanium preparation techniques on root canal geometry assessed by microcomputed tomography.
Loizides AL; Kakavetsos VD; Tzanetakis GN; Kontakiotis EG; Eliades G
J Endod; 2007 Dec; 33(12):1455-9. PubMed ID: 18037058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Micro-Computed Tomography Evaluation of ProTaper Next and BioRace Shaping Outcomes in Maxillary First Molar Curved Canals.
Pasqualini D; Alovisi M; Cemenasco A; Mancini L; Paolino DS; Bianchi CC; Roggia A; Scotti N; Berutti E
J Endod; 2015 Oct; 41(10):1706-10. PubMed ID: 26321061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Measure and compare the Degree of Root Canal Transportation and Canal-centering ability of Twisted, ProTaper, and Conventional Stainless Steel K Files using Spiral Computed Tomography: An in vitro Study.
Rejula F; Christalin R; Ahmed W; Dinakaran S; Gopinathan AS; Babu A
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Jun; 18(6):463-469. PubMed ID: 28621275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Cone-beam Computed Tomographic Analysis of Canal Transportation and Centering Ability of Single-file Systems.
Hasheminia SM; Farhad A; Sheikhi M; Soltani P; Hendi SS; Ahmadi M
J Endod; 2018 Dec; 44(12):1788-1791. PubMed ID: 30390970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Effects of root canal preparation on apical geometry assessed by micro-computed tomography.
Paqué F; Ganahl D; Peters OA
J Endod; 2009 Jul; 35(7):1056-9. PubMed ID: 19567334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparing canal transportation and centering ability of endosequence and vortex rotary files by using micro-computed tomography.
Yamamura B; Cox TC; Heddaya B; Flake NM; Johnson JD; Paranjpe A
J Endod; 2012 Aug; 38(8):1121-5. PubMed ID: 22794219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Changes in centring and shaping ability using three nickel–titanium instrumentation techniques analysed by micro-computed tomography (μCT).
Stern S; Patel S; Foschi F; Sherriff M; Mannocci F
Int Endod J; 2012 Jun; 45(6):514-23. PubMed ID: 22625863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Preparation of oval-shaped root canals in mandibular molars using nickel-titanium rotary instruments: a micro-computed tomography study.
Paqué F; Balmer M; Attin T; Peters OA
J Endod; 2010 Apr; 36(4):703-7. PubMed ID: 20307747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Effects of three nickel titanium instrument systems on root canal geometry assessed by micro-computed tomography.
Gergi R; Osta N; Bourbouze G; Zgheib C; Arbab-Chirani R; Naaman A
Int Endod J; 2015 Feb; 48(2):162-70. PubMed ID: 24717063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Root Canal Surface Strain and Canal Center Transportation Induced by 3 Different Nickel-Titanium Rotary Instrument Systems.
Liu W; Wu B
J Endod; 2016 Feb; 42(2):299-303. PubMed ID: 26686822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Root canal area increase promoted by the EndoSequence and ProTaper systems: comparison by computed tomography.
Bernardes RA; Rocha EA; Duarte MA; Vivan RR; de Moraes IG; Bramante AS; de Azevedo JR
J Endod; 2010 Jul; 36(7):1179-82. PubMed ID: 20630294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
Schäfer E; Vlassis M
Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):239-48. PubMed ID: 15056350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison among manual instruments and PathFile and Mtwo rotary instruments to create a glide path in the root canal preparation of curved canals.
Alves Vde O; Bueno CE; Cunha RS; Pinheiro SL; Fontana CE; de Martin AS
J Endod; 2012 Jan; 38(1):117-20. PubMed ID: 22152634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparison of canal transportation and centering ability of Xp Shaper, WaveOne and Oneshape: a cone beam computed tomography study of curved root canals.
Hassan R; Roshdy N; Issa N
Acta Odontol Latinoam; 2018 Jun; 31(1):67-74. PubMed ID: 30056469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of single cone obturation performance of different novel nickel-titanium rotary systems.
Capar ID; Ertas H; Ok E; Arslan H
Acta Odontol Scand; 2014 Oct; 72(7):537-42. PubMed ID: 24460041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Shaping potential of manual NiTi K-File and rotary ProTaper and analyzing the final outcome of shaped canals using CT.
Kakar S; Dhingra A; Sharma H
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 May; 14(3):451-5. PubMed ID: 24171988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison of canal transportation and centering ability of twisted files, Pathfile-ProTaper system, and stainless steel hand K-files by using computed tomography.
Gergi R; Rjeily JA; Sader J; Naaman A
J Endod; 2010 May; 36(5):904-7. PubMed ID: 20416443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Cone-beam computed tomographic analysis of apical transportation and centering ratio of ProTaper and XP-endo Shaper NiTi rotary systems in curved canals: an in vitro study.
Karkehabadi H; Siahvashi Z; Shokri A; Haji Hasani N
BMC Oral Health; 2021 May; 21(1):277. PubMed ID: 34034735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparative study of six rotary nickel-titanium systems and hand instrumentation for root canal preparation.
Guelzow A; Stamm O; Martus P; Kielbassa AM
Int Endod J; 2005 Oct; 38(10):743-52. PubMed ID: 16164689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
