These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25715041)

  • 1. Mechanical influence of thread pitch on orthodontic mini-implant stability.
    Cunha AC; Freitas AO; Marquezan M; Nojima LI
    Braz Oral Res; 2015; 29():. PubMed ID: 25715041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of cortical thickness on the stability of mini-implants with microthreads.
    Vilani GN; Ruellas AC; Mattos CT; Fernandes DJ; Elias CN
    Braz Oral Res; 2015; 29():. PubMed ID: 25627887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Primary stability and histomorphometric bone-implant contact of self-drilling and self-tapping orthodontic microimplants.
    Çehreli S; Arman-Özçırpıcı A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Feb; 141(2):187-95. PubMed ID: 22284286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of bone architecture on the primary stability of different mini-implant designs.
    da Cunha AC; Marquezan M; Lima I; Lopes RT; Nojima LI; Sant'Anna EF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Jan; 147(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 25533071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of bone quality, implant type, and implantation site preparation on insertion torques of mini-implants used for orthodontic anchorage.
    Wilmes B; Drescher D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Jul; 40(7):697-703. PubMed ID: 21458232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of different implant materials on the primary stability of orthodontic mini-implants.
    Pan CY; Chou ST; Tseng YC; Yang YH; Wu CY; Lan TH; Liu PH; Chang HP
    Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2012 Dec; 28(12):673-8. PubMed ID: 23217360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of primary stability of used and unused self-tapping and self-drilling orthodontic mini-implants.
    Baser B; Ozel MB
    Adv Clin Exp Med; 2024 May; 33(5):483-489. PubMed ID: 37676101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In vitro evaluation of insertion and removal torques of orthodontic mini-implants.
    Pithon MM; Nojima MG; Nojima LI
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Jan; 40(1):80-5. PubMed ID: 21050721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mechanical evaluation of orthodontic mini-implants of different lengths.
    Pithon MM; Figueiredo DS; Oliveira DD
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Mar; 71(3):479-86. PubMed ID: 23273488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A torque removal study on the primary stability of orthodontic titanium screw mini-implants in the cortical bone of dog femurs.
    Okazaki J; Komasa Y; Sakai D; Kamada A; Ikeo T; Toda I; Suwa F; Inoue M; Etoh T
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Jul; 37(7):647-50. PubMed ID: 18554870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of autoclaving on the fracture torque of mini-implants used for orthodontic anchorage.
    Mattos CT; Ruellas AC; Sant'anna EF
    J Orthod; 2011 Mar; 38(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 21367824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of the fracture torque of different Brazilian mini-implants.
    Lima GM; Soares MS; Penha SS; Romano MM
    Braz Oral Res; 2011; 25(2):116-21. PubMed ID: 21537637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Orthodontic mini-implant stability at different insertion depths : Sensitivity of three stability measurement methods.
    Nienkemper M; Santel N; Hönscheid R; Drescher D
    J Orofac Orthop; 2016 Jul; 77(4):296-303. PubMed ID: 27272055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Removal torque values of surface-treated mini-implants after loading.
    Kim SH; Cho JH; Chung KR; Kook YA; Nelson G
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jul; 134(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 18617101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Peak insertion torque values of five mini-implant systems under different insertion loads.
    Quraishi E; Sherriff M; Bister D
    J Orthod; 2014 Jun; 41(2):102-9. PubMed ID: 24521745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fracture resistance of orthodontic mini-implants: a biomechanical in vitro study.
    Wilmes B; Panayotidis A; Drescher D
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Aug; 33(4):396-401. PubMed ID: 21310766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Insertional torque and axial pull-out strength of mini-implants in mandibles of dogs.
    Salmória KK; Tanaka OM; Guariza-Filho O; Camargo ES; de Souza LT; Maruo H
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jun; 133(6):790.e15-22. PubMed ID: 18538236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of mini-implant length and diameter on primary stability under loading with two force levels.
    Chatzigianni A; Keilig L; Reimann S; Eliades T; Bourauel C
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Aug; 33(4):381-7. PubMed ID: 21062964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of fracture torque resistance of orthodontic mini-implants.
    Dalla Rosa F; Burmann PF; Ruschel HC; Vargas IA; Kramer PF
    Acta Odontol Latinoam; 2016 Dec; 29(3):248-254. PubMed ID: 28383605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of gripping volume in the mechanical strengths of orthodontic mini-implant.
    Tseng YC; Wu JH; Chen HS; Chen CM; Ting CC
    Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2017 Nov; 33(11):578-583. PubMed ID: 29050676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.