These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25715042)

  • 21. Effectiveness of twin blocks and extraoral maxillary splint (Thurow) appliances for the correction of Class II relationships.
    Fernandes ÁF; Brunharo IH; Quintão CC; Costa MG; de Oliveira-Costa MR
    World J Orthod; 2010; 11(3):230-5. PubMed ID: 20877731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effects of the reciprocal mini-chin cup appliance.
    Aslan BI; Dinçer M
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Feb; 30(1):80-8. PubMed ID: 18276929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Perception of changes in soft-tissue profile after Herbst appliance treatment of Class II Division 1 malocclusion.
    Rego MV; Martinez EF; Coelho RM; Leal LM; Thiesen G
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Mar; 151(3):559-564. PubMed ID: 28257740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Class II correction with the modified sagittal appliance and maxillary second molar extraction.
    Aras A
    Angle Orthod; 2000 Aug; 70(4):332-8. PubMed ID: 10961784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Facial profile preferences: differences in the perception of children with and without orthodontic history.
    Cala L; Spalj S; Slaj M; Lapter MV; Slaj M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Oct; 138(4):442-450. PubMed ID: 20889049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Maxillary expansion in Class II correction with orthopedic cervical headgear. A posteroanterior cephalometric study.
    Kirjavainen M; Kirjavainen T
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Jun; 73(3):281-5. PubMed ID: 12828436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Long-term occlusal and soft-tissue profile outcomes after treatment of Class II Division 1 malocclusion with fixed appliances.
    McGuinness NJ; Burden DJ; Hunt OT; Johnston CD; Stevenson M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Mar; 139(3):362-8. PubMed ID: 21392692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Changes in facial profile after maxillomandibular advancement surgery for obstructive sleep apnea syndrome.
    Cohen-Levy J; Petelle B; Vieille E; Dumitrache M; Fleury B
    Int Orthod; 2013 Mar; 11(1):71-92. PubMed ID: 23402956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Investigation on facial profile preferences of orthodontic patients].
    Wang YY; Guo CC; Zhou C; Fan ML; Wang WC; Bao BC
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2012 Dec; 21(6):668-72. PubMed ID: 23364553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Efficacy of the Sander bite-jumping appliance in growing patients with mandibular retrusion: a randomized controlled trial.
    Martina R; Cioffi I; Galeotti A; Tagliaferri R; Cimino R; Michelotti A; Valletta R; Farella M; Paduano S
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2013 May; 16(2):116-26. PubMed ID: 23323608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The effects of forehead and neck position on esthetics of class I, II and III profiles.
    Salehi P; Oshagh M; Aleyasin ZS; Pakshir HR
    Int J Esthet Dent; 2014; 9(3):412-25. PubMed ID: 25126620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Profile changes in orthodontic patients treated with mandibular advancement surgery.
    Tsang ST; McFadden LR; Wiltshire WA; Pershad N; Baker AB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jan; 135(1):66-72. PubMed ID: 19121503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Changes in the craniofacial structures and esthetic perceptions of soft-tissue profile alterations after distalization and Herbst appliance treatment.
    Irezli EC; Baysal A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2021 Mar; 159(3):292-304. PubMed ID: 33487502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Dentoskeletal changes induced by the Jasper jumper and cervical headgear appliances followed by fixed orthodontic treatment.
    de Oliveira JN; Rodrigues de Almeida R; Rodrigues de Almeida M; de Oliveira JN
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jul; 132(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 17628251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Intercepted orthopedic treatment of skeletal maxillary protrusion deformity].
    Zhou XK
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1989 Jul; 24(4):208-11, 254-5. PubMed ID: 2517093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Facial aesthetics and the divine proportion: a comparison of surgical and non-surgical class II treatment.
    Shell TL; Woods MG
    Aust Orthod J; 2004 Nov; 20(2):51-63. PubMed ID: 16429875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The effects of face mask and tongue appliance on maxillary deficiency in growing patients: a randomized clinical trial.
    Showkatbakhsh R; Jamilian A; Taban T; Golrokh M
    Prog Orthod; 2012 Nov; 13(3):266-72. PubMed ID: 23260537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Sagittal changes after maxillary protraction with expansion in class III patients in the primary, mixed, and late mixed dentitions: a longitudinal retrospective study.
    Saadia M; Torres E
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Jun; 117(6):669-80. PubMed ID: 10842110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Treatment of Class II protrusion with severe crowding using indirect miniscrew anchorage.
    Choi NC; Park YC; Lee HA; Lee KJ
    Angle Orthod; 2007 Nov; 77(6):1109-18. PubMed ID: 18004931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Esthetic evaluation of Asian-Chinese profiles from a white perspective.
    Chan EK; Soh J; Petocz P; Darendeliler MA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Apr; 133(4):532-8. PubMed ID: 18405817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.