These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25715257)

  • 1. N3 subclassification incorporated into the final pathologic staging of gastric cancer: a modified system based on current AJCC staging.
    Yeh CN; Wang SY; Hsu JT; Chiang KC; Cheng CT; Tsai CY; Liu YY; Liao CH; Liu KH; Yeh TS
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2015 Feb; 94(8):e575. PubMed ID: 25715257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Rationality of N3 classification and its sub-classification in TNM classification system for advanced gastric cancer].
    Cheng Y; Huang J; Zhu Z; Xu H
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Jul; 19(7):749-55. PubMed ID: 27452751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A modified subclassification to evaluate the survival of patients with N3 gastric cancer: an international database study.
    Lin MQ; Wang JB; Zheng CH; Li P; Xie JW; Lin JX; Lu J; Chen QY; Cao LL; Lin M; He QL; Huang CM
    BMC Cancer; 2019 Jan; 19(1):21. PubMed ID: 30616588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of staging between the old (6th edition) and new (7th edition) TNM classifications in advanced gastric cancer.
    Kikuchi S; Futawatari N; Sakuramoto S; Katada N; Yamashita K; Shibata T; Nemoto M; Watanabe M
    Anticancer Res; 2011 Jun; 31(6):2361-5. PubMed ID: 21737665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The rationality of N3 classification in the 7th edition of the International Union Against Cancer TNM staging system for gastric adenocarcinomas: a case-control study.
    Jun KH; Lee JS; Kim JH; Kim JJ; Chin HM; Park SM
    Int J Surg; 2014; 12(9):893-6. PubMed ID: 25026311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of the seventh edition of American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM staging system for gastric cancer: results from a Chinese monoinstitutional study.
    Sun Z; Wang ZN; Zhu Z; Xu YY; Xu Y; Huang BJ; Zhu GL; Xu HM
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Jun; 19(6):1918-27. PubMed ID: 22246426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The 8th edition American Joint Committee on gastric cancer pathological staging classification performs well in a population with high proportion of locally advanced disease.
    Huang SF; Chien TH; Fang WL; Wang F; Tsai CY; Hsu JT; Yeh CN; Chen TC; Wu RC; Chiu CT; Yeh TS
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2018 Oct; 44(10):1634-1639. PubMed ID: 29941227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. External validation of a modified 8th AJCC TNM system for advanced gastric cancer: Long-term results in southern China.
    Ye J; Ren Y; Wei Z; Hou X; Dai W; Cai S; Tan M; He Y; Yuan Y
    Surg Oncol; 2018 Jun; 27(2):146-153. PubMed ID: 29937164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A homogenized approach to classify advanced gastric cancer patients with limited and adequate number of pathologically examined lymph nodes.
    Seeruttun SR; Xu L; Wang F; Yi X; Fang C; Liu Z; Wang W; Zhou Z
    Cancer Commun (Lond); 2019 Jun; 39(1):32. PubMed ID: 31182160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison the sixth and seventh editions of the AJCC staging system for T1 gastric cancer: a long-term follow-up study of 2124 patients.
    Choi KH; Kim BS; Oh ST; Yook JH; Kim BS
    Gastric Cancer; 2017 Jan; 20(1):43-48. PubMed ID: 26732877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Proposal of a novel stage grouping of the Eighth Edition of American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM Staging System for Gastric Cancer: results from a retrospective study of 30 years clinical data from a single institute in China.
    Zhang J; Zou S; Luo R; Zhu Z; Xu H; Huang B
    Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2020 Jan; 14(1):55-64. PubMed ID: 31062631
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of the staging of regional lymph nodes using the sixth and seventh editions of the tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) classification system for the evaluation of overall survival in gastric cancer patients: findings of a case-control analysis involving a single institution in China.
    Deng J; Zhang R; Pan Y; Wang B; Wu L; Jiao X; Bao T; Hao X; Liang H
    Surgery; 2014 Jul; 156(1):64-74. PubMed ID: 24929759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A novel lymph node staging system for gastric cancer including modified Union for cancer Control/American Joint Committee on cancer and Japanese Gastric Cancer Association criteria.
    Gong Y; Pan S; Wang X; Zhu G; Xu H; Zhu Z
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2020 Oct; 46(10 Pt B):e27-e32. PubMed ID: 32631708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of the 6th and 7th editions of the AJCC/UICC TNM staging system for gastric cancer focusing on the "N" parameter-related survival: the monoinstitutional NodUs Italian study.
    Marano L; Boccardi V; Braccio B; Esposito G; Grassia M; Petrillo M; Pezzella M; Porfidia R; Reda G; Romano A; Schettino M; Cosenza A; Izzo G; Di Martino N
    World J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jul; 13():215. PubMed ID: 26179492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Validation of seventh edition AJCC gastric cancer staging modifications.
    Kim DH; Oh CA; Oh SJ; Choi MG; Noh JH; Sohn TS; Bae JM; Kim S
    J Surg Oncol; 2012 Jan; 105(1):26-30. PubMed ID: 21761411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Validation of the 8th Edition of the AJCC TNM Staging System for Gastric Cancer using the National Cancer Database.
    In H; Solsky I; Palis B; Langdon-Embry M; Ajani J; Sano T
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2017 Nov; 24(12):3683-3691. PubMed ID: 28895113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of the 8th UICC staging system for esophageal and gastric cancers in Siewert type II junctional adenocarcinomas.
    Karstens KF; Ghadban T; Sawez S; Konczalla L; Woestemeier A; Bachmann K; Uzunoglu FG; Tachezy M; Vettorazzi E; Izbicki JR; Reeh M
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2020 Apr; 46(4 Pt A):638-643. PubMed ID: 31879051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The prognostic value of different node staging systems in patients with ≤15 lymph nodes following surgery for gastric adenocarcinoma.
    Kılıç MÖ; Gündoğdu SB; Özden S; Saylam B; Tez M
    Acta Chir Belg; 2018 Feb; 118(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 28669280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Validation of the American Joint Commission on Cancer (8th edition) changes for patients with stage III gastric cancer: survival analysis of a large series from a Specialized Eastern Center.
    Lu J; Zheng CH; Cao LL; Ling SW; Li P; Xie JW; Wang JB; Lin JX; Chen QY; Lin M; Tu RH; Huang CM
    Cancer Med; 2017 Oct; 6(10):2179-2187. PubMed ID: 28913982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Anatomical location-based nodal staging system is superior to the 7th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system among patients with surgically resected, histologically low-grade gastric cancer: A single institutional experience.
    Chen MW; Chan CP; Lin YJ; Yen HH
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(2):e0211836. PubMed ID: 30721261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.