166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25715257)
1. N3 subclassification incorporated into the final pathologic staging of gastric cancer: a modified system based on current AJCC staging.
Yeh CN; Wang SY; Hsu JT; Chiang KC; Cheng CT; Tsai CY; Liu YY; Liao CH; Liu KH; Yeh TS
Medicine (Baltimore); 2015 Feb; 94(8):e575. PubMed ID: 25715257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Rationality of N3 classification and its sub-classification in TNM classification system for advanced gastric cancer].
Cheng Y; Huang J; Zhu Z; Xu H
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Jul; 19(7):749-55. PubMed ID: 27452751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A modified subclassification to evaluate the survival of patients with N3 gastric cancer: an international database study.
Lin MQ; Wang JB; Zheng CH; Li P; Xie JW; Lin JX; Lu J; Chen QY; Cao LL; Lin M; He QL; Huang CM
BMC Cancer; 2019 Jan; 19(1):21. PubMed ID: 30616588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of staging between the old (6th edition) and new (7th edition) TNM classifications in advanced gastric cancer.
Kikuchi S; Futawatari N; Sakuramoto S; Katada N; Yamashita K; Shibata T; Nemoto M; Watanabe M
Anticancer Res; 2011 Jun; 31(6):2361-5. PubMed ID: 21737665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The rationality of N3 classification in the 7th edition of the International Union Against Cancer TNM staging system for gastric adenocarcinomas: a case-control study.
Jun KH; Lee JS; Kim JH; Kim JJ; Chin HM; Park SM
Int J Surg; 2014; 12(9):893-6. PubMed ID: 25026311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of the seventh edition of American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM staging system for gastric cancer: results from a Chinese monoinstitutional study.
Sun Z; Wang ZN; Zhu Z; Xu YY; Xu Y; Huang BJ; Zhu GL; Xu HM
Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Jun; 19(6):1918-27. PubMed ID: 22246426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The 8th edition American Joint Committee on gastric cancer pathological staging classification performs well in a population with high proportion of locally advanced disease.
Huang SF; Chien TH; Fang WL; Wang F; Tsai CY; Hsu JT; Yeh CN; Chen TC; Wu RC; Chiu CT; Yeh TS
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2018 Oct; 44(10):1634-1639. PubMed ID: 29941227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. External validation of a modified 8th AJCC TNM system for advanced gastric cancer: Long-term results in southern China.
Ye J; Ren Y; Wei Z; Hou X; Dai W; Cai S; Tan M; He Y; Yuan Y
Surg Oncol; 2018 Jun; 27(2):146-153. PubMed ID: 29937164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A homogenized approach to classify advanced gastric cancer patients with limited and adequate number of pathologically examined lymph nodes.
Seeruttun SR; Xu L; Wang F; Yi X; Fang C; Liu Z; Wang W; Zhou Z
Cancer Commun (Lond); 2019 Jun; 39(1):32. PubMed ID: 31182160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison the sixth and seventh editions of the AJCC staging system for T1 gastric cancer: a long-term follow-up study of 2124 patients.
Choi KH; Kim BS; Oh ST; Yook JH; Kim BS
Gastric Cancer; 2017 Jan; 20(1):43-48. PubMed ID: 26732877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Proposal of a novel stage grouping of the Eighth Edition of American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM Staging System for Gastric Cancer: results from a retrospective study of 30 years clinical data from a single institute in China.
Zhang J; Zou S; Luo R; Zhu Z; Xu H; Huang B
Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2020 Jan; 14(1):55-64. PubMed ID: 31062631
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of the staging of regional lymph nodes using the sixth and seventh editions of the tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) classification system for the evaluation of overall survival in gastric cancer patients: findings of a case-control analysis involving a single institution in China.
Deng J; Zhang R; Pan Y; Wang B; Wu L; Jiao X; Bao T; Hao X; Liang H
Surgery; 2014 Jul; 156(1):64-74. PubMed ID: 24929759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A novel lymph node staging system for gastric cancer including modified Union for cancer Control/American Joint Committee on cancer and Japanese Gastric Cancer Association criteria.
Gong Y; Pan S; Wang X; Zhu G; Xu H; Zhu Z
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2020 Oct; 46(10 Pt B):e27-e32. PubMed ID: 32631708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of the 6th and 7th editions of the AJCC/UICC TNM staging system for gastric cancer focusing on the "N" parameter-related survival: the monoinstitutional NodUs Italian study.
Marano L; Boccardi V; Braccio B; Esposito G; Grassia M; Petrillo M; Pezzella M; Porfidia R; Reda G; Romano A; Schettino M; Cosenza A; Izzo G; Di Martino N
World J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jul; 13():215. PubMed ID: 26179492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Validation of the American Joint Commission on Cancer (8th edition) changes for patients with stage III gastric cancer: survival analysis of a large series from a Specialized Eastern Center.
Lu J; Zheng CH; Cao LL; Ling SW; Li P; Xie JW; Wang JB; Lin JX; Chen QY; Lin M; Tu RH; Huang CM
Cancer Med; 2017 Oct; 6(10):2179-2187. PubMed ID: 28913982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Validation of seventh edition AJCC gastric cancer staging modifications.
Kim DH; Oh CA; Oh SJ; Choi MG; Noh JH; Sohn TS; Bae JM; Kim S
J Surg Oncol; 2012 Jan; 105(1):26-30. PubMed ID: 21761411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validation of the 8th Edition of the AJCC TNM Staging System for Gastric Cancer using the National Cancer Database.
In H; Solsky I; Palis B; Langdon-Embry M; Ajani J; Sano T
Ann Surg Oncol; 2017 Nov; 24(12):3683-3691. PubMed ID: 28895113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of the 8th UICC staging system for esophageal and gastric cancers in Siewert type II junctional adenocarcinomas.
Karstens KF; Ghadban T; Sawez S; Konczalla L; Woestemeier A; Bachmann K; Uzunoglu FG; Tachezy M; Vettorazzi E; Izbicki JR; Reeh M
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2020 Apr; 46(4 Pt A):638-643. PubMed ID: 31879051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The prognostic value of different node staging systems in patients with ≤15 lymph nodes following surgery for gastric adenocarcinoma.
Kılıç MÖ; Gündoğdu SB; Özden S; Saylam B; Tez M
Acta Chir Belg; 2018 Feb; 118(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 28669280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Anatomical location-based nodal staging system is superior to the 7th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system among patients with surgically resected, histologically low-grade gastric cancer: A single institutional experience.
Chen MW; Chan CP; Lin YJ; Yen HH
PLoS One; 2019; 14(2):e0211836. PubMed ID: 30721261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
