530 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25715333)
1. Postoral glucose sensing, not caloric content, determines sugar reward in C57BL/6J mice.
Sclafani A; Zukerman S; Ackroff K
Chem Senses; 2015 May; 40(4):245-58. PubMed ID: 25715333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. BALB/c and SWR inbred mice differ in post-oral fructose appetition as revealed by sugar versus non-nutritive sweetener tests.
Kraft TT; Huang D; Lolier M; Warshaw D; LaMagna S; Natanova E; Sclafani A; Bodnar RJ
Physiol Behav; 2016 Jan; 153():64-9. PubMed ID: 26485292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Flavor preferences conditioned by nutritive and non-nutritive sweeteners in mice.
Sclafani A; Ackroff K
Physiol Behav; 2017 May; 173():188-199. PubMed ID: 28192132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. CAST/EiJ and C57BL/6J Mice Differ in Their Oral and Postoral Attraction to Glucose and Fructose.
Sclafani A; Vural AS; Ackroff K
Chem Senses; 2017 Mar; 42(3):259-267. PubMed ID: 28158517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Differential fructose and glucose appetition in DBA/2, 129P3 and C57BL/6 × 129P3 hybrid mice revealed by sugar versus non-nutritive sweetener tests.
Nashed M; Castillo A; Roland M; Carata I; Berglas E; Pines R; Riaz S; Morisset BJ; Sclafani A; Bodnar RJ
Physiol Behav; 2021 Nov; 241():113590. PubMed ID: 34509472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fructose- and glucose-conditioned preferences in FVB mice: strain differences in post-oral sugar appetition.
Sclafani A; Zukerman S; Ackroff K
Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol; 2014 Dec; 307(12):R1448-57. PubMed ID: 25320345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Strain differences in sucrose- and fructose-conditioned flavor preferences in mice.
Pinhas A; Aviel M; Koen M; Gurgov S; Acosta V; Israel M; Kakuriev L; Guskova E; Fuzailov I; Touzani K; Sclafani A; Bodnar RJ
Physiol Behav; 2012 Jan; 105(2):451-9. PubMed ID: 21945373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Taste does not determine daily intake of dilute sugar solutions in mice.
Glendinning JI; Beltran F; Benton L; Cheng S; Gieseke J; Gillman J; Spain HN
Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol; 2010 Nov; 299(5):R1333-41. PubMed ID: 20702804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Consumption of SC45647 and sucralose by rats selectively bred for high and low saccharin intake.
Dess NK; Chapman CD; Monroe D
Chem Senses; 2009 Mar; 34(3):211-20. PubMed ID: 19129238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Conditioned preference and avoidance induced in mice by the rare sugars isomaltulose and allulose.
Sclafani A; Castillo A; Carata I; Pines R; Berglas E; Joseph S; Sarker J; Nashed M; Roland M; Arzayus S; Williams N; Glendinning JI; Bodnar RJ
Physiol Behav; 2023 Aug; 267():114221. PubMed ID: 37146897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ghrelin signaling is not essential for sugar or fat conditioned flavor preferences in mice.
Sclafani A; Touzani K; Ackroff K
Physiol Behav; 2015 Oct; 149():14-22. PubMed ID: 26003495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sucrose motivation in sweet "sensitive" (C57BL/6J) and "subsensitive" (129P3/J) mice measured by progressive ratio licking.
Sclafani A
Physiol Behav; 2006 Apr; 87(4):734-44. PubMed ID: 16530236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of caloric or non-caloric sweetener long-term consumption on taste preferences and new aversive learning.
Vera-Rivera G; Miranda MI; Rangel-Hernández JA; Badillo-Juárez D; Fregoso-Urrutia D; Caynas-Rojas S
Nutr Neurosci; 2020 Feb; 23(2):128-138. PubMed ID: 29862893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The basolateral nucleus of the amygdala mediates caloric sugar preference over a non-caloric sweetener in mice.
Yasoshima Y; Yoshizawa H; Shimura T; Miyamoto T
Neuroscience; 2015 Apr; 291():203-15. PubMed ID: 25684750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of T1r3 and Trpm5 on carbohydrate preference and acceptance in C57BL/6 mice.
Zukerman S; Glendinning JI; Margolskee RF; Sclafani A
Chem Senses; 2013 Jun; 38(5):421-37. PubMed ID: 23547138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. No detriment in taste response or expression in offspring of mice fed representative levels of sucrose or non-caloric sucralose while pregnant.
Choo E; Dando R
Physiol Behav; 2018 Feb; 184():39-45. PubMed ID: 29108962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. MCH receptor deletion does not impair glucose-conditioned flavor preferences in mice.
Sclafani A; Adamantidis A; Ackroff K
Physiol Behav; 2016 Sep; 163():239-244. PubMed ID: 27195455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Post-oral appetite stimulation by sugars and nonmetabolizable sugar analogs.
Zukerman S; Ackroff K; Sclafani A
Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol; 2013 Oct; 305(7):R840-53. PubMed ID: 23926132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Flavor preferences conditioned by intragastric glucose but not fructose or galactose in C57BL/6J mice.
Sclafani A; Ackroff K
Physiol Behav; 2012 Jun; 106(4):457-61. PubMed ID: 22445944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fat and sugar flavor preference and acceptance in C57BL/6J and 129 mice: experience attenuates strain differences.
Sclafani A
Physiol Behav; 2007 Mar; 90(4):602-11. PubMed ID: 17210165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
