These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

398 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25715349)

  • 21. Standardized letters of recommendation and successful match into otolaryngology.
    Kimple AJ; McClurg SW; Del Signore AG; Tomoum MO; Lin FC; Senior BA
    Laryngoscope; 2016 May; 126(5):1071-6. PubMed ID: 26839977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Ideas and Innovations to Improve the Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Residency Application and Selection Process.
    Salehi PP; Heiser A; Salehi P; Manes RP; Judson BL; Azizzadeh B; Lee YH
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2021 May; 164(5):1001-1010. PubMed ID: 33076735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A Simulation of the Effect of Interview Caps on the National Resident Matching Program Match in Otolaryngology.
    Mitton TJ; Elder R; Hunter JB
    Acad Med; 2023 Apr; 98(4):448-454. PubMed ID: 36515560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Implications of Change to USMLE Step 1 Scoring for Otolaryngology Residency Programs.
    Kalyoussef E; Dhanda AK; Paskhover B
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2020 Nov; 163(5):855-856. PubMed ID: 32633611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Applicant Perspectives on the Otolaryngology Residency Application Process.
    Ward M; Pingree C; Laury AM; Bowe SN
    JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2017 Aug; 143(8):782-787. PubMed ID: 28542682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Increasing Competitiveness for an Otolaryngology Residency: Where We Are and Concerns about the Future.
    Kaplan AB; Riedy KN; Grundfast KM
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2015 Nov; 153(5):699-701. PubMed ID: 26187905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. I dream of Gini: Quantifying inequality in otolaryngology residency interviews.
    Lee AH; Young P; Liao R; Yi PH; Reh D; Best SR
    Laryngoscope; 2019 Mar; 129(3):627-633. PubMed ID: 30408192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Match 2017: Blindsided or Fumbled?
    Chang CWD
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2018 Apr; 158(4):594-597. PubMed ID: 29460682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Characteristics of the applicant pool to vascular surgery residency programs.
    Eidt JF; Chaikof E; Sidawy AN;
    J Vasc Surg; 2005 Sep; 42(3):519-23. PubMed ID: 16171600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The State of the Otolaryngology Match: A Review of Applicant Trends, "Impossible" Qualifications, and Implications.
    Bowe SN; Schmalbach CE; Laury AM
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2017 Jun; 156(6):985-990. PubMed ID: 28319452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The effects of the change in the NRMP matching algorithm. National Resident Matching Program.
    Roth AE; Peranson E
    JAMA; 1997 Sep; 278(9):729-32. PubMed ID: 9286832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Applicant characteristics associated with successful matching into otolaryngology.
    Hauser LJ; Gebhard GM; Blumhagen R; Carlson NE; Cabrera-Muffly C
    Laryngoscope; 2017 May; 127(5):1052-1057. PubMed ID: 27767217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Peri-Interview Communication in the Otolaryngology Residency Match: The Applicant Perspective.
    Masciello M; Malekzadeh S
    Laryngoscope; 2021 Jan; 131(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 32065402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. No Longer a Match: Trends in Radiation Oncology National Resident Matching Program (NRMP) Data from 2010-2020 and Comparison Across Specialties.
    Goodman CR; Sim AJ; Jeans EB; Anderson JD; Dooley S; Agarwal A; Tye K; Albert A; Gillespie EF; Tendulkar RD; Fuller CD; Kavanagh BD; Campbell SR
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2021 Jun; 110(2):278-287. PubMed ID: 33716120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Trends in the Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Match: Analysis of NRMP Data from 2007 to 2018.
    Claus D; Anderson D; Staley V; Forster J; Meron A
    PM R; 2021 Sep; 13(9):986-993. PubMed ID: 33237637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Impact of Medical Student Research Fellowships on Otolaryngology Match Outcomes.
    Dorismond C; Shah RN; Ebert CS; Buckmire RA
    Laryngoscope; 2021 Sep; 131(9):E2506-E2512. PubMed ID: 33734440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Academic Characteristics of Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Applicants from 2007 to 2014.
    DePasse JM; Palumbo MA; Eberson CP; Daniels AH
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2016 May; 98(9):788-95. PubMed ID: 27147692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Motivations and demographics of I-6 and traditional 5+2 cardiothoracic surgery resident applicants: insights from an academic training program.
    Varghese TK; Mokadam NA; Verrier ED; Wallyce D; Wood DE
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2014 Sep; 98(3):877-83. PubMed ID: 25085556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Trends in the 10-year history of the vascular integrated residency match: More work, higher cost, same result.
    McMackin KK; Caputo FJ; Hoell NG; Trani J; Carpenter JP; Lombardi JV
    J Vasc Surg; 2020 Jul; 72(1):298-303. PubMed ID: 32037082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A p⁴ report: effect of curriculum innovation on residency applications and match performance.
    Garvin RD; Eiff MP; Pugno P; Douglass A; Duane M; Young R; Saultz JW; Waller E; Carney PA
    Fam Med; 2011; 43(7):472-9. PubMed ID: 21761378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.