138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25715360)
1. Influence of various breast factors on the quality of strain elastograms.
Song G; Jing L; Yan M; Cong S; Xuejiao W
J Ultrasound Med; 2015 Mar; 34(3):395-400. PubMed ID: 25715360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Factors Affecting the Quality of Breast Quasistatic Ultrasound Elastograms.
Zou H; Xue Y; Ou Y; Li S; Zhao Y; Shao L; Li Y
J Ultrasound Med; 2018 Jul; 37(7):1701-1712. PubMed ID: 29288591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Computer-assisted assessment of ultrasound real-time elastography: initial experience in 145 breast lesions.
Zhang X; Xiao Y; Zeng J; Qiu W; Qian M; Wang C; Zheng R; Zheng H
Eur J Radiol; 2014 Jan; 83(1):e1-7. PubMed ID: 24148563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Lesion edge preserved direct average strain estimation for ultrasound elasticity imaging.
Hussain MA; Alam F; Rupa SA; Awwal R; Lee SY; Hasan MK
Ultrasonics; 2014 Jan; 54(1):137-46. PubMed ID: 23806339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Differentiating between malignant and benign breast masses: factors limiting sonoelastographic strain ratio.
Stachs A; Hartmann S; Stubert J; Dieterich M; Martin A; Kundt G; Reimer T; Gerber B
Ultraschall Med; 2013 Apr; 34(2):131-6. PubMed ID: 23108926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Combined Use of Ultrasound Elastography and B-Mode Sonography for Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Circumscribed Breast Masses.
Kim SY; Park JS; Koo HR
J Ultrasound Med; 2015 Nov; 34(11):1951-9. PubMed ID: 26384609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Shear Wave Elastography (SWE): An Analysis of Breast Lesion Characterization in 83 Breast Lesions.
Feldmann A; Langlois C; Dewailly M; Martinez EF; Boulanger L; Kerdraon O; Faye N
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2015 Oct; 41(10):2594-604. PubMed ID: 26159068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Breast mass evaluation: factors influencing the quality of US elastography.
Chang JM; Moon WK; Cho N; Kim SJ
Radiology; 2011 Apr; 259(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 21330569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Breast ultrasound elastography and magnetic resonance imaging of fibrotic changes of breast disease: correlations between elastography findings and pathologic and short Tau inversion recovery imaging results, including the enhancement ratio and apparent diffusion coefficient.
Matsubayashi RN; Imanishi M; Nakagawa S; Takahashi R; Akashi M; Momosaki S; Muranaka T
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2015; 39(1):94-101. PubMed ID: 25299798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Strain elastography for prediction of breast cancer tumor grades.
Grajo JR; Barr RG
J Ultrasound Med; 2014 Jan; 33(1):129-34. PubMed ID: 24371107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Semi-quantitative and qualitative assessment of breast ultrasound elastography in differentiating between malignant and benign lesions.
Alhabshi SM; Rahmat K; Abdul Halim N; Aziz S; Radhika S; Gan GC; Vijayananthan A; Westerhout CJ; Mohd-Shah MN; Jaszle S; Harlina Mohd Latar N; Muhammad R
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2013 Apr; 39(4):568-78. PubMed ID: 23384468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dynamic frame pairing in real-time freehand elastography.
Xia R; Tao G; Thittai AK
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2014 Jun; 61(6):979-85. PubMed ID: 24859661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Added value of Virtual Touch IQ shear wave elastography in the ultrasound assessment of breast lesions.
Ianculescu V; Ciolovan LM; Dunant A; Vielh P; Mazouni C; Delaloge S; Dromain C; Blidaru A; Balleyguier C
Eur J Radiol; 2014 May; 83(5):773-7. PubMed ID: 24602803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Real-time monitoring of high-intensity focused ultrasound treatment using axial strain and axial-shear strain elastograms.
Xia R; Thittai AK
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Mar; 40(3):485-95. PubMed ID: 24361216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bimodal Multiparameter-Based Approach for Benign-Malignant Classification of Breast Tumors.
Ara SR; Alam F; Rahman MH; Akhter S; Awwal R; Hasan K
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2015 Jul; 41(7):2022-38. PubMed ID: 25913281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Breast strain elastography: Observer variability in data acquisition and interpretation.
Dong Y; Zhou C; Zhou J; Yang Z; Zhang J; Zhan W
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Apr; 101():157-161. PubMed ID: 29571790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnostic performance of quantitative shear wave elastography in the evaluation of solid breast masses: determination of the most discriminatory parameter.
Au FW; Ghai S; Moshonov H; Kahn H; Brennan C; Dua H; Crystal P
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Sep; 203(3):W328-36. PubMed ID: 25148191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Discordant elastography images of breast lesions: how various factors lead to discordant findings.
Yoon JH; Kim MJ; Kim EK; Moon HJ; Choi JS
Ultraschall Med; 2013 Jun; 34(3):266-71. PubMed ID: 22723039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. 3-D visualization and non-linear tissue classification of breast tumors using ultrasound elastography in vivo.
Sayed A; Layne G; Abraham J; Mukdadi OM
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Jul; 40(7):1490-502. PubMed ID: 24768484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diagnosis of solid breast lesions by elastography 5-point score and strain ratio method.
Zhao QL; Ruan LT; Zhang H; Yin YM; Duan SX
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Nov; 81(11):3245-9. PubMed ID: 22749109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
