These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25715540)

  • 1. A right to choose how to live: the Australian common law position on refusals of care.
    Curnow K
    J Law Med; 2014 Dec; 22(2):398-414. PubMed ID: 25715540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fetal viability as a threshold to personhood. A legal analysis.
    Peterfy A
    J Leg Med; 1995 Dec; 16(4):607-36. PubMed ID: 8568420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Withdrawing treatment at the direct or indirect request of patients or in their best interests: HNEAHS v A; Brightwater CG v Rossiter; and Australian Capital Territory v JT.
    Faunce T
    J Law Med; 2009 Dec; 17(3):349-54. PubMed ID: 20169796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [The human body, subject or object of rights?].
    Rachet-Darfeuille V
    Soins; 2018; 63(822):16-18. PubMed ID: 29439788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Our bodies, our choices: Australian law on foetal personhood.
    Anolak H
    Women Birth; 2015 Mar; 28(1):60-4. PubMed ID: 25458964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Children and refusal of medical treatment: in urgent need of reform.
    Lennings N
    J Law Med; 2013 Sep; 21(1):122-41. PubMed ID: 24218787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Refusal of emergency caesarean section in Ireland: a relational approach.
    Wade K
    Med Law Rev; 2014; 22(1):1-25. PubMed ID: 24255134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An absurd inconsistency in law: Nicklinson's case and deciding to die.
    Douglas M
    J Law Med; 2014 Mar; 21(3):627-40. PubMed ID: 24804532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Patients' decisions to die: the emerging Australian jurisprudence.
    Freckelton I
    J Law Med; 2011 Mar; 18(3):427-38. PubMed ID: 21528731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A direct advance on advance directives.
    Shaw D
    Bioethics; 2012 Jun; 26(5):267-74. PubMed ID: 21133977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An Orwellian scenario: court ordered caesarean section and women's autonomy.
    Cahill H
    Nurs Ethics; 1999 Nov; 6(6):494-505. PubMed ID: 10696195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Advance directives and the promotion of autonomy: a comparative Australian statutory analysis.
    Willmott L
    J Law Med; 2010 Feb; 17(4):556-81. PubMed ID: 20329457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The bereavement gap: grief, human dignity and legal personhood in the debate over Zoe's law.
    Robert H
    J Law Med; 2014 Dec; 22(2):319-34. PubMed ID: 25715535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Patients' refusal of recommended treatment.
    Dickens BM; Cook RJ
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2015 Oct; 131(1):105-8. PubMed ID: 26194409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Informed consent.
    McCullough LB; Chervenak FA
    Clin Perinatol; 2007 Jun; 34(2):275-85, vi. PubMed ID: 17572234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Advanced directives, the right to die and the common law: recent problems with blood transfusions.
    Stewart C
    Melb Univ Law Rev; 1999 Apr; 23(1):161-83. PubMed ID: 12678066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Managed care, autonomy, and decisionmaking at the end of life.
    Meisel A
    Houst Law Rev; 1999; 35(5):1393-1436. PubMed ID: 12071216
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Consent and refusal for adolescents: the law.
    Carey B
    Br J Nurs; 2009 Dec 10-2010 Jan 13; 18(22):1366-8. PubMed ID: 20081691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Relying on common law defences to legalise assisted dying: problems and possibilities.
    Michalowski S
    Med Law Rev; 2013; 21(3):337-70. PubMed ID: 23118471
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Historical evolution and modern implications of concepts of consent to, and refusal of, medical treatment in the law of trespass.
    Mendelson D
    J Leg Med; 1996 Mar; 17(1):1-71. PubMed ID: 8882797
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.