BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

263 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25715727)

  • 21. Cone beam CT for dental and maxillofacial imaging: dose matters.
    Pauwels R
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):156-61. PubMed ID: 25805884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A survey of the first 6 years of experience with cone beam CT scanning in a teaching hospital orthodontic department.
    Dobbyn LM; Morrison JF; Brocklebank LM; Chung LL
    J Orthod; 2013 Mar; 40(1):14-21. PubMed ID: 23524543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The use of cone-beam computed tomography in an orthodontic department in between research and daily clinic.
    Cattaneo PM; Melsen B
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(3):269-82. PubMed ID: 18834009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Guidelines for the safe use of dental and maxillofacial CBCT: a review with recommendations for South Africa.
    Noffke CE; Farman AG; Nel S; Nzima N
    SADJ; 2011 Jul; 66(6):262, 264-6. PubMed ID: 23198473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. American Academy of Periodontology Best Evidence Consensus Statement on Selected Oral Applications for Cone-Beam Computed Tomography.
    Mandelaris GA; Scheyer ET; Evans M; Kim D; McAllister B; Nevins ML; Rios HF; Sarment D
    J Periodontol; 2017 Oct; 88(10):939-945. PubMed ID: 28967333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Cone beam computed tomography in evaluations of some side effects of orthodontic treatment.
    Lund H
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 2011; (219):4-78. PubMed ID: 22338281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Dosimetry of a cone-beam computed tomography machine compared with a digital x-ray machine in orthodontic imaging.
    Grünheid T; Kolbeck Schieck JR; Pliska BT; Ahmad M; Larson BE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Apr; 141(4):436-43. PubMed ID: 22464525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. CBCT--the justification process, audit and review of the recent literature.
    Fanning B
    J Ir Dent Assoc; 2011; 57(5):256-61. PubMed ID: 22165476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Cone beam CT paranasal sinuses versus standard multidetector and low dose multidetector CT studies.
    Al Abduwani J; ZilinSkiene L; Colley S; Ahmed S
    Am J Otolaryngol; 2016; 37(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 26700263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Appropriate use of ionizing radiation in orthodontic practice and research.
    Abdelkarim AA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Feb; 147(2):166-8. PubMed ID: 25636548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The impacted canine--an orthodontic perspective.
    Madsen DP
    Ann R Australas Coll Dent Surg; 2012 Apr; 21():111-2. PubMed ID: 24783845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effectiveness of impacted and supernumerary tooth diagnosis from traditional radiography versus cone beam computed tomography.
    Katheria BC; Kau CH; Tate R; Chen JW; English J; Bouquot J
    Pediatr Dent; 2010; 32(4):304-9. PubMed ID: 20836949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Orthodontists' criteria for prescribing cone-beam computed tomography-a multi-country survey.
    Caiado GM; Evangelista K; Freire MDCM; Almeida FT; Pacheco-Pereira C; Flores-Mir C; Cevidanes LHS; Ruelas ACO; Vasconcelos KF; Preda F; Willems G; Jacobs R; Valladares-Neto J; Silva MAG
    Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Feb; 26(2):1625-1636. PubMed ID: 34424401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. CBCT imaging - A boon to orthodontics.
    Machado GL
    Saudi Dent J; 2015 Jan; 27(1):12-21. PubMed ID: 25544810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Update on cone beam technology and orthodontic analysis.
    Kau CH; Li JL; Li Q; Abou Kheir N
    Dent Clin North Am; 2014 Jul; 58(3):653-69. PubMed ID: 24993927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Position statement of the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology on selection criteria for the use of radiology in dental implantology with emphasis on cone beam computed tomography.
    Tyndall DA; Price JB; Tetradis S; Ganz SD; Hildebolt C; Scarfe WC;
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2012 Jun; 113(6):817-26. PubMed ID: 22668710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Incidental findings on craniomaxillofacial cone beam computed tomography in orthodontic patients.
    Kocsis C; Sommerlath Sohns JM; Graf I; Dreiseidler T; Kreppel M; Rothamel D; Zinser M; Sommerlath Sohns HC; Derlin T; Braumann B; Zöller JE; Ritter L
    Int J Comput Dent; 2019; 22(2):149-162. PubMed ID: 31134221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Changes of alveolar bone dehiscence and fenestration after augmented corticotomy-assisted orthodontic treatment: a CBCT evaluation.
    Sun L; Yuan L; Wang B; Zhang L; Shen G; Fang B
    Prog Orthod; 2019 Feb; 20(1):7. PubMed ID: 30773604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Cone beam computed tomography: third eye in diagnosis and treatment planning.
    Seth V; Kamath P; Vaidya N
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2012; 23(2):17-22. PubMed ID: 22873019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Cone beam computed tomography radiation dose and image quality assessments.
    Lofthag-Hansen S
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 2010; (209):4-55. PubMed ID: 21229915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.