37 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25716065)
1. Papanicolaou test use among reproductive-age women at high risk for cervical cancer: analyses of the 1995 National Survey of Family Growth.
Hewitt M; Devesa S; Breen N
Am J Public Health; 2002 Apr; 92(4):666-9. PubMed ID: 11919069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Knowledge and beliefs about cervical cancer screening among men in Kumasi, Ghana.
Williams MS; Amoateng P
Ghana Med J; 2012 Sep; 46(3):147-51. PubMed ID: 23661828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Knowledge, attitudes and practices regarding the Pap test among women in Northeastern Brazil.
Albuquerque CL; Costa Mda P; Nunes FM; Freitas RW; Azevedo PR; Fernandes JV; Rego JV; Barreto HM
Sao Paulo Med J; 2014; 132(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 24474073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cervical cancer and the global health agenda: Insights from multiple policy-analysis frameworks.
Parkhurst JO; Vulimiri M
Glob Public Health; 2013; 8(10):1093-108. PubMed ID: 24236409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A 'smear campaign' against patient-excluded policy changes: a reflection on the language used in cervical screening programmes.
Morse IM; Amiry J
Br J Gen Pract; 2024 Jun; 74(suppl 1):. PubMed ID: 38902077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Managing an extension of screening intervals: Avoiding boom and bust in health care workloads.
Pesola F; Rebolj M; Sasieni P
Int J Cancer; 2023 May; 152(10):2061-2068. PubMed ID: 36691808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. What do South Asian immigrant women know about HPV, cervical cancer and its early detection: A cross-sectional Australian study.
Alam Z; Dean JA; Janda M
J Migr Health; 2022; 5():100102. PubMed ID: 35480875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Women's experiences of the renewed National Cervical Screening Program in Australia 12 months following implementation: a qualitative study.
Dodd RH; Mac OA; McCaffery KJ
BMJ Open; 2020 Jul; 10(7):e039041. PubMed ID: 32665351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. 'It has saved thousands of lives, so why change it?' Content analysis of objections to cervical screening programme changes in Australia.
Obermair HM; Dodd RH; Bonner C; Jansen J; McCaffery K
BMJ Open; 2018 Feb; 8(2):e019171. PubMed ID: 29440214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Barriers and missed opportunities in breast and cervical cancer screening among women aged 50 and over, New York City, 2002.
Nash D; Chan C; Horowitz D; Vlahov D
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2007; 16(1):46-56. PubMed ID: 17324096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cervical cancer services for Indigenous women: advocacy, community-based research and policy change in Australia.
Manderson L; Hoban E
Women Health; 2006; 43(4):69-88. PubMed ID: 17135089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cervical cancer screening: How our approach may change.
Hofmeister S
J Fam Pract; 2016 Aug; 65(8):551-3. PubMed ID: 27660838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The recommended interval for cervical cancer screening: Victorian women's attitudes to an extended interval.
Scalzo K; Mullins R
Aust N Z J Public Health; 2015 Apr; 39(2):153-6. PubMed ID: 25716065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Physician recommendation for papanicolaou testing among U.S. women, 2000.
Coughlin SS; Breslau ES; Thompson T; Benard VB
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2005 May; 14(5):1143-8. PubMed ID: 15894664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Attendance rate in the Polish Cervical Cancer Screening Program in the years 2007-2009].
Spaczyński M; Karowicz-Bilinska A; Rokita W; Molińska-Glura M; Januszek-Michalecka L; Seroczyński P; Uchlik J; Nowak-Markwitz E
Ginekol Pol; 2010 Sep; 81(9):655-63. PubMed ID: 20973201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
