These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25716556)

  • 1. Assessment of a fast generated analytical matrix for rotating slat collimation iterative reconstruction: a possible method to optimize the collimation profile.
    Boisson F; Bekaert V; Reilhac A; Wurtz J; Brasse D
    Phys Med Biol; 2015 Mar; 60(6):2403-19. PubMed ID: 25716556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fast 3D iterative image reconstruction for SPECT with rotating slat collimators.
    Holen RV; Vandenberghe S; Staelens S; De Beenhouwer J; Lemahieu I
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Feb; 54(3):715-29. PubMed ID: 19131666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparing planar image quality of rotating slat and parallel hole collimation: influence of system modeling.
    Van Holen R; Vandenberghe S; Staelens S; Lemahieu I
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Apr; 53(7):1989-2002. PubMed ID: 18356576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Tomographic image quality of rotating slat versus parallel hole-collimated SPECT.
    Van Holen R; Staelens S; Vandenberghe S
    Phys Med Biol; 2011 Nov; 56(22):7205-22. PubMed ID: 22024539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Determination of optimal collimation parameters for a rotating slat collimator system: a system matrix method using ML-EM.
    Boisson F; Bekaert V; Brasse D
    Phys Med Biol; 2016 Mar; 61(6):2302-18. PubMed ID: 26930449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Correction of photon attenuation and collimator response for a body-contouring SPECT/CT imaging system.
    Seo Y; Wong KH; Sun M; Franc BL; Hawkins RA; Hasegawa BH
    J Nucl Med; 2005 May; 46(5):868-77. PubMed ID: 15872362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The image quality of FBP and MLEM reconstruction.
    Wieczorek H
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Jun; 55(11):3161-76. PubMed ID: 20479513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison between parallel hole and rotating slat collimation: analytical noise propagation models.
    Zhou L; Defrise M; Vunckx K; Nuyts J
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2010 Dec; 29(12):2038-52. PubMed ID: 20667808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Aperture collimation correction and maximum-likelihood image reconstruction for near-field coded aperture imaging of single photon emission computerized tomography.
    Mu Z; Liu YH
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2006 Jun; 25(6):701-11. PubMed ID: 16768235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An efficient analytical calculation of probability matrix in 2D SPECT.
    Loudos GK
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2008 Mar; 32(2):83-94. PubMed ID: 17981436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. SPECT imaging of high energy isotopes and isotopes with high energy contaminants with rotating slat collimators.
    Van Holen R; Staelens S; Vandenberghe S
    Med Phys; 2009 Sep; 36(9):4257-67. PubMed ID: 19810500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of a noise-weighted filtered backprojection algorithm with the Standard MLEM algorithm for poisson noise.
    Zeng GL
    J Nucl Med Technol; 2013 Dec; 41(4):283-8. PubMed ID: 24159012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Maximum-Likelihood Expectation-Maximization Algorithm Versus Windowed Filtered Backprojection Algorithm: A Case Study.
    Zeng GL
    J Nucl Med Technol; 2018 Jun; 46(2):129-132. PubMed ID: 29438005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. System characteristics of SPECT with a slat collimated strip detector.
    Vandenberghe S; Van Holen R; Staelens S; Lemahieu I
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Jan; 51(2):391-405. PubMed ID: 16394346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fully 3D Monte Carlo reconstruction in SPECT: a feasibility study.
    Lazaro D; El Bitar Z; Breton V; Hill D; Buvat I
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Aug; 50(16):3739-54. PubMed ID: 16077224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Analytical, experimental, and Monte Carlo system response matrix for pinhole SPECT reconstruction.
    Aguiar P; Pino F; Silva-Rodríguez J; Pavía J; Ros D; Ruibal A; El Bitar Z
    Med Phys; 2014 Mar; 41(3):032501. PubMed ID: 24593739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Enhanced PET resolution by combining pinhole collimation and coincidence detection.
    DiFilippo FP
    Phys Med Biol; 2015 Oct; 60(20):7969-84. PubMed ID: 26418305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of fan beam, slit-slat and multi-pinhole collimators for molecular breast tomosynthesis.
    van Roosmalen J; Beekman FJ; Goorden MC
    Phys Med Biol; 2018 May; 63(10):105009. PubMed ID: 29676285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A generalization of the maximum likelihood expectation maximization (MLEM) method: Masked-MLEM.
    Zheng Y; Frame E; Caravaca J; Gullberg GT; Vetter K; Seo Y
    Phys Med Biol; 2023 Dec; 68(24):. PubMed ID: 37918026
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. SPECT Imaging of 2-D and 3-D Distributed Sources with Near-Field Coded Aperture Collimation: Computer Simulation and Real Data Validation.
    Mu Z; Dobrucki LW; Liu YH
    J Med Biol Eng; 2016; 36():32-43. PubMed ID: 27069461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.