These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
256 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25719252)
1. Comparison of 4 specular microscopes in healthy eyes and eyes with cornea guttata or corneal grafts. Luft N; Hirnschall N; Schuschitz S; Draschl P; Findl O Cornea; 2015 Apr; 34(4):381-6. PubMed ID: 25719252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of central corneal thickness and endothelial cell measurements by Scheimpflug camera system and two noncontact specular microscopes. Karaca I; Yilmaz SG; Palamar M; Ates H Int Ophthalmol; 2018 Aug; 38(4):1601-1609. PubMed ID: 28674859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of manual and automated endothelial cell density analysis in normal eyes and DSEK eyes. Price MO; Fairchild KM; Price FW Cornea; 2013 May; 32(5):567-73. PubMed ID: 22893099 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison between laser scanning in vivo confocal microscopy and noncontact specular microscopy in assessing corneal endothelial cell density and central corneal thickness. Salvetat ML; Zeppieri M; Miani F; Parisi L; Felletti M; Brusini P Cornea; 2011 Jul; 30(7):754-9. PubMed ID: 21150426 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Corneal endothelial cell density and pachymetry measured by contact and noncontact specular microscopy. Módis L; Langenbucher A; Seitz B J Cataract Refract Surg; 2002 Oct; 28(10):1763-9. PubMed ID: 12388025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical outcome of 500 consecutive cases undergoing Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Rodríguez-Calvo-de-Mora M; Quilendrino R; Ham L; Liarakos VS; van Dijk K; Baydoun L; Dapena I; Oellerich S; Melles GR Ophthalmology; 2015 Mar; 122(3):464-70. PubMed ID: 25439596 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Measurements of central corneal thickness and endothelial parameters with three different non-contact specular microscopy devices. Cakici O; Karadag R; Bayramlar H; Koyun E Int Ophthalmol; 2017 Feb; 37(1):229-233. PubMed ID: 27221264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of automated corneal endothelial cell analysis in healthy and postoperative eyes with phakic intraocular lens: a cross-sectional study and literature review. Choi H; Ryu IH; Lee IS; Kim JK; Yoo TK BMC Ophthalmol; 2024 Jul; 24(1):318. PubMed ID: 39080583 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical outcomes in descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty with internationally shipped precut donor corneas. Nakagawa H; Inatomi T; Hieda O; Sotozono C; Yokoi N; Iliakis B; Miller TD; Ulrickson C; Kinoshita S Am J Ophthalmol; 2014 Jan; 157(1):50-55.e1. PubMed ID: 24210766 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of manual & automated analysis methods for corneal endothelial cell density measurements by specular microscopy. Huang J; Maram J; Tepelus TC; Modak C; Marion K; Sadda SR; Chopra V; Lee OL J Optom; 2018; 11(3):182-191. PubMed ID: 28797649 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of Noncontact Specular and Confocal Microscopy for Evaluation of Corneal Endothelium. Huang J; Maram J; Tepelus TC; Sadda SR; Chopra V; Lee OL Eye Contact Lens; 2018 Sep; 44 Suppl 1():S144-S150. PubMed ID: 28346276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fellow eye comparison of corneal thickness and curvature in descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty and descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Goldich Y; Artornsombidth P; Avni-Zauberman N; Perez M; Ulate R; Elbaz U; Rootman DS Cornea; 2014 Jun; 33(6):547-50. PubMed ID: 24699562 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Regression analysis of corneal endothelium after nonmechanical penetrating keratoplasty]. Langenbucher A; Nguyen NX; Kus MM; Blüthner K; Küchle M; Seitz B Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2000 Jun; 216(6):393-9; discussion 400. PubMed ID: 10919119 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison and evaluation of central corneal thickness using 2 new noncontact specular microscopes and conventional pachymetry devices. Bao F; Wang Q; Cheng S; Savini G; Lu W; Feng Y; Yu Y; Huang J Cornea; 2014 Jun; 33(6):576-81. PubMed ID: 24699563 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of the corneal endothelium using noncontact and contact specular microscopy. Szalai E; Németh G; Berta A; Módis L Cornea; 2011 May; 30(5):567-70. PubMed ID: 21598434 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty with a donor insertion device: clinical results and complications in 100 eyes. Khor WB; Han SB; Mehta JS; Tan DT Am J Ophthalmol; 2013 Oct; 156(4):773-9. PubMed ID: 23831219 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty with a graft insertion device: surgical technique and early clinical results. Khor WB; Mehta JS; Tan DT Am J Ophthalmol; 2011 Feb; 151(2):223-32.e2. PubMed ID: 21168813 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]