These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25719360)

  • 1. Developing a laddered algorithm for the management of intractable epistaxis: a risk analysis.
    Leung RM; Smith TL; Rudmik L
    JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2015 May; 141(5):405-9. PubMed ID: 25719360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cost-effectiveness analysis of endoscopic sphenopalatine artery ligation vs arterial embolization for intractable epistaxis.
    Rudmik L; Leung R
    JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2014 Sep; 140(9):802-8. PubMed ID: 25123233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cost-effectiveness of trans-nasal endoscopic sphenopalatine artery ligation vs arterial embolisation for intractable epistaxis: Long-term analyses.
    Costa N; Mounié M; Bernard G; Bieler L; Molinier L; Serrano E; de Bonnecaze G
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2019 Jul; 44(4):511-517. PubMed ID: 30720918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Economic analysis of the treatment of posterior epistaxis.
    Miller TR; Stevens ES; Orlandi RR
    Am J Rhinol; 2005; 19(1):79-82. PubMed ID: 15794080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cost-effectiveness of endoscopic sphenopalatine artery ligation versus nasal packing as first-line treatment for posterior epistaxis.
    Dedhia RC; Desai SS; Smith KJ; Lee S; Schaitkin BM; Snyderman CH; Wang EW
    Int Forum Allergy Rhinol; 2013 Jul; 3(7):563-6. PubMed ID: 23307796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Transnasal Endoscopic Sphenopalatine Artery Ligation Compared With Embolization for Intractable Epistaxis: A Long-term Analysis.
    de Bonnecaze G; Gallois Y; Bonneville F; Vergez S; Chaput B; Serrano E
    Am J Rhinol Allergy; 2018 May; 32(3):188-193. PubMed ID: 29676168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Inpatient management of epistaxis: outcomes and cost.
    Goddard JC; Reiter ER
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2005 May; 132(5):707-12. PubMed ID: 15886622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Endoscopic ligation of the sphenopalatine artery and the maxillary artery for the treatment of intractable posterior epistaxis.
    Seno S; Arikata M; Sakurai H; Owaki S; Fukui J; Suzuki M; Shimizu T
    Am J Rhinol Allergy; 2009; 23(2):197-9. PubMed ID: 19401049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Recent trends in epistaxis management in the United States: 2008-2010.
    Villwock JA; Jones K
    JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2013 Dec; 139(12):1279-84. PubMed ID: 24136624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Optimizing the outcome of transnasal endoscopic sphenopalatine artery ligation in managing refractory posterior epistaxis: A case-control analysis.
    Dutta M; Haldar D
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2017 Oct; 44(5):554-560. PubMed ID: 27876219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Surgical management of posterior epistaxis: a changing paradigm.
    Klotz DA; Winkle MR; Richmon J; Hengerer AS
    Laryngoscope; 2002 Sep; 112(9):1577-82. PubMed ID: 12352666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Role of Endoscopic Internal Maxillary Artery Ligation in Intractable Idiopathic Epistaxis.
    Sasindran V; John MS
    Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2020 Jun; 72(2):228-233. PubMed ID: 32551282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Endoscopic Sphenopalatine Artery Ligation in Posterior Epistaxis: Retrospective Analysis of 30 Patients.
    İsmi O; Vayisoğlu Y; Özcan C; Görür K; Ünal M
    Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Jun; 54(2):47-52. PubMed ID: 29392016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Management of intractable spontaneous epistaxis.
    Rudmik L; Smith TL
    Am J Rhinol Allergy; 2012; 26(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 22391084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Outcomes analysis in epistaxis management: development of a therapeutic algorithm.
    Shargorodsky J; Bleier BS; Holbrook EH; Cohen JM; Busaba N; Metson R; Gray ST
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2013 Sep; 149(3):390-8. PubMed ID: 23764960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of internal maxillary artery ligation versus embolization for refractory posterior epistaxis.
    Cullen MM; Tami TA
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1998 May; 118(5):636-42. PubMed ID: 9591862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Intractable epistaxis: transantral ligation vs. embolization: efficacy review and cost analysis.
    Strong EB; Bell DA; Johnson LP; Jacobs JM
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1995 Dec; 113(6):674-8. PubMed ID: 7501376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Variations in utilization and clinical outcomes for endoscopic sphenopalatine artery ligation and endovascular arterial embolization in a single multi-hospital network.
    Lelegren M; Bhat K; Sheehan B; Lamichhane R; Han JK; Lam KK
    Am J Otolaryngol; 2021; 42(6):103066. PubMed ID: 33934006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Contemporary perspectives on the management of posterior epistaxis: survey of canadian otolaryngologists.
    Tam S; Rotenberg B
    J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2011 Jun; 40(3):249-55. PubMed ID: 21518649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Endoscopic management of posterior epistaxis: a review.
    McClurg SW; Carrau R
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2014 Feb; 34(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 24711676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.