573 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25720071)
1. Comparison of five automated hematology analyzers in a university hospital setting: Abbott Cell-Dyn Sapphire, Beckman Coulter DxH 800, Siemens Advia 2120i, Sysmex XE-5000, and Sysmex XN-2000.
Bruegel M; Nagel D; Funk M; Fuhrmann P; Zander J; Teupser D
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2015 Jun; 53(7):1057-71. PubMed ID: 25720071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Performance evaluation of the latest fully automated hematology analyzers in a large, commercial laboratory setting: a 4-way, side-by-side study.
Bourner G; Dhaliwal J; Sumner J
Lab Hematol; 2005; 11(4):285-97. PubMed ID: 16475476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Performance evaluation of the automated nucleated red blood cell count of five commercial hematological analyzers.
Da Rin G; Vidali M; Balboni F; Benegiamo A; Borin M; Ciardelli ML; Dima F; Di Fabio A; Fanelli A; Fiorini F; Francione S; Germagnoli L; Gioia M; Lari T; Lorubbio M; Marini A; Papa A; Seghezzi M; Solarino L; Pipitone S; Tilocca E; Buoro S
Int J Lab Hematol; 2017 Dec; 39(6):663-670. PubMed ID: 28990291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Performance and abnormal cell flagging comparisons of three automated blood cell counters: Cell-Dyn Sapphire, DxH-800, and XN-2000.
Hotton J; Broothaers J; Swaelens C; Cantinieaux B
Am J Clin Pathol; 2013 Dec; 140(6):845-52. PubMed ID: 24225753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of automated differential blood cell counts from Abbott Sapphire, Siemens Advia 120, Beckman Coulter DxH 800, and Sysmex XE-2100 in normal and pathologic samples.
Meintker L; Ringwald J; Rauh M; Krause SW
Am J Clin Pathol; 2013 May; 139(5):641-50. PubMed ID: 23596116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of performance and abnormal cell flagging of two automated hematology analyzers: Sysmex XN 3000 and Beckman Coulter DxH 800.
Genc S; Dervisoglu E; Erdem S; Arslan O; Aktan M; Omer B
Int J Lab Hematol; 2017 Dec; 39(6):633-640. PubMed ID: 28980399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison study of the rates of manual peripheral blood smear review from 3 automated hematology analyzers, Unicel DxH 800, ADVIA 2120i, and XE 2100, using international consensus group guidelines.
Kim SJ; Kim Y; Shin S; Song J; Choi JR
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2012 Nov; 136(11):1408-13. PubMed ID: 23106587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of the Beckman Coulter UniCel DxH 800, Beckman Coulter LH 780, and Abbott Diagnostics Cell-Dyn Sapphire hematology analyzers on adult specimens in a tertiary care hospital.
Tan BT; Nava AJ; George TI
Am J Clin Pathol; 2011 Jun; 135(6):939-51. PubMed ID: 21571967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Optimal flagging combinations for best performance of five blood cell analyzers.
Depoorter M; Goletti S; Latinne D; Defour J
Int J Lab Hematol; 2015 Feb; 37(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 24739185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Performance evaluation of Sysmex XN hematology analyzer in umbilical cord blood: a comparison study with Sysmex XE-2100.
Kim H; Hur M; Choi SG; Moon HW; Yun YM; Hwang HS; Kwon HS; Sohn IS
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2014 Dec; 52(12):1771-9. PubMed ID: 24978899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of four hematology analyzers, CELL-DYN Sapphire, ADVIA 120, Coulter LH 750, and Sysmex XE-2100, in terms of clinical usefulness.
Kang SH; Kim HK; Ham CK; Lee DS; Cho HI
Int J Lab Hematol; 2008 Dec; 30(6):480-6. PubMed ID: 19062362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of the Beckman Coulter UniCel DxH 800 and Abbott Diagnostics Cell-Dyn Sapphire hematology analyzers on pediatric and neonatal specimens in a tertiary care hospital.
Tan BT; Nava AJ; George TI
Am J Clin Pathol; 2011 Jun; 135(6):929-38. PubMed ID: 21571966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of the nucleated red blood cell count in neonates using the Beckman Coulter UniCel DxH 800 analyzer.
Kwon MJ; Nam MH; Kim SH; Lim CS; Lee CK; Cho Y; Lee KN; Yoon SY
Int J Lab Hematol; 2011 Dec; 33(6):620-8. PubMed ID: 21631891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of abnormal cell flagging of the hematology analyzers Sysmex XN and Sysmex XE-5000 in oncohematologic patients.
Furundarena JR; Sainz M; Uranga A; Cuevas L; Lopez I; Zubicaray J; Bizjak A; Robado N; Araiz M
Int J Lab Hematol; 2017 Feb; 39(1):58-67. PubMed ID: 27981789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Performance evaluation of the Sysmex XN-1000V in side-by-side comparison with the Siemens ADVIA 120 and manual methods for healthy CD Sprague-Dawley rats and CD-1 mice.
Schroeder JM; Lee HC; Schultze AE
Vet Clin Pathol; 2024 Mar; 53(1):8-39. PubMed ID: 38164989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Automated five-part white blood cell differential counts. Efficiency of software-generated white blood cell suspect flags of the hematology analyzers Sysmex SE-9000, Sysmex NE-8000, and Coulter STKS.
Thalhammer-Scherrer R; Knöbl P; Korninger L; Schwarzinger I
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Jun; 121(6):573-7. PubMed ID: 9199621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of the AcT 5 diff autoloader hematology analyzer to the Abbott Cell-Dyn 3200 analyzer at Charlevoix Area Hospital.
Rogers S
Lab Hematol; 2003; 9(3):160-6. PubMed ID: 14521324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Performance Evaluation of Body Fluid Cellular Analysis Using the Beckman Coulter UniCel DxH 800, Sysmex XN-350, and UF-5000 Automated Cellular Analyzers.
Cho J; Oh J; Lee SG; Lee YH; Song J; Kim JH
Ann Lab Med; 2020 Mar; 40(2):122-130. PubMed ID: 31650728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Initial performance evaluation of the UniCel® DxH 800 Coulter® cellular analysis system.
Hedley BD; Keeney M; Chin-Yee I; Brown W
Int J Lab Hematol; 2011 Feb; 33(1):45-56. PubMed ID: 20491996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. External quality assessment of automated hematology analyzer performance using fresh human blood samples in Shanghai.
Xiaobo H; Yong L; Daming J; Lei X; Ying S; Jinfeng Z
Lab Hematol; 2003; 9(3):175-8. PubMed ID: 14521326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
