176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25720749)
1. Breast Density Analysis Using an Automatic Density Segmentation Algorithm.
Oliver A; Tortajada M; Lladó X; Freixenet J; Ganau S; Tortajada L; Vilagran M; Sentís M; Martí R
J Digit Imaging; 2015 Oct; 28(5):604-12. PubMed ID: 25720749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of using manual or automatic breast density information in a mass detection CAD system.
Oliver A; Lladó X; Freixenet J; Martí R; Pérez E; Pont J; Zwiggelaar R
Acad Radiol; 2010 Jul; 17(7):877-83. PubMed ID: 20540910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Automated mammographic breast density estimation using a fully convolutional network.
Lee J; Nishikawa RM
Med Phys; 2018 Mar; 45(3):1178-1190. PubMed ID: 29363774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A new method for quantitative analysis of mammographic density.
Glide-Hurst CK; Duric N; Littrup P
Med Phys; 2007 Nov; 34(11):4491-8. PubMed ID: 18072514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Computerized image analysis: estimation of breast density on mammograms.
Zhou C; Chan HP; Petrick N; Helvie MA; Goodsitt MM; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM
Med Phys; 2001 Jun; 28(6):1056-69. PubMed ID: 11439475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of a fully automated, high-throughput mammographic density measurement tool for use with processed digital mammograms.
Couwenberg AM; Verkooijen HM; Li J; Pijnappel RM; Charaghvandi KR; Hartman M; van Gils CH
Cancer Causes Control; 2014 Aug; 25(8):1037-43. PubMed ID: 24962023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Determination of mammographic breast density using a deep convolutional neural network.
Ciritsis A; Rossi C; Vittoria De Martini I; Eberhard M; Marcon M; Becker AS; Berger N; Boss A
Br J Radiol; 2019 Jan; 92(1093):20180691. PubMed ID: 30209957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Geometry-Based Pectoral Muscle Segmentation From MLO Mammogram Views.
Taghanaki SA; Liu Y; Miles B; Hamarneh G
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2017 Nov; 64(11):2662-2671. PubMed ID: 28129144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A population-based tissue probability map-driven level set method for fully automated mammographic density estimations.
Kim Y; Hong BW; Kim SJ; Kim JH
Med Phys; 2014 Jul; 41(7):071905. PubMed ID: 24989383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Semi-automated and fully automated mammographic density measurement and breast cancer risk prediction.
Llobet R; Pollán M; Antón J; Miranda-García J; Casals M; Martínez I; Ruiz-Perales F; Pérez-Gómez B; Salas-Trejo D; Pérez-Cortés JC
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2014 Sep; 116(2):105-15. PubMed ID: 24636804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Impact of breast density on computer-aided detection (CAD) of breast cancer].
Yang KY; Liu XJ; Zhai RY
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2012 May; 34(5):360-3. PubMed ID: 22883457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Correspondence in texture features between two mammographic views.
Gupta S; Markey MK
Med Phys; 2005 Jun; 32(6):1598-606. PubMed ID: 16013719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of fully and semi-automated area-based methods for measuring mammographic density and predicting breast cancer risk.
Sovio U; Li J; Aitken Z; Humphreys K; Czene K; Moss S; Hall P; McCormack V; dos-Santos-Silva I
Br J Cancer; 2014 Apr; 110(7):1908-16. PubMed ID: 24556624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Correlation between mammographic density and volumetric fibroglandular tissue estimated on breast MR images.
Wei J; Chan HP; Helvie MA; Roubidoux MA; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM; Zhou C; Paquerault S; Chenevert T; Goodsitt MM
Med Phys; 2004 Apr; 31(4):933-42. PubMed ID: 15125012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A complete software application for automatic registration of x-ray mammography and magnetic resonance images.
Solves-Llorens JA; Rupérez MJ; Monserrat C; Feliu E; García M; Lloret M
Med Phys; 2014 Aug; 41(8):081903. PubMed ID: 25086534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prediction of breast cancer risk using a machine learning approach embedded with a locality preserving projection algorithm.
Heidari M; Khuzani AZ; Hollingsworth AB; Danala G; Mirniaharikandehei S; Qiu Y; Liu H; Zheng B
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Jan; 63(3):035020. PubMed ID: 29239858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Design and clinical validation of a software program for automated measurement of mammographic breast density.
Araújo ALC; Soares HB; Carvalho DF; Mendonça RM; Oliveira AG
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2020 Mar; 20(1):45. PubMed ID: 32122371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of volumetric breast density estimations from mammography and thorax CT.
Geeraert N; Klausz R; Cockmartin L; Muller S; Bosmans H; Bloch I
Phys Med Biol; 2014 Aug; 59(15):4391-409. PubMed ID: 25049219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Statistical evaluation of a fully automated mammographic breast density algorithm.
Abdolell M; Tsuruda K; Schaller G; Caines J
Comput Math Methods Med; 2013; 2013():651091. PubMed ID: 23737861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prediction of near-term risk of developing breast cancer using computerized features from bilateral mammograms.
Sun W; Zheng B; Lure F; Wu T; Zhang J; Wang BY; Saltzstein EC; Qian W
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2014 Jul; 38(5):348-57. PubMed ID: 24725671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
