These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Monocular Perceptual Deprivation from Interocular Suppression Temporarily Imbalances Ocular Dominance. Kim HW; Kim CY; Blake R Curr Biol; 2017 Mar; 27(6):884-889. PubMed ID: 28262490 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Monocular rivalry exhibits three hallmarks of binocular rivalry: evidence for common processes. O'Shea RP; Parker A; La Rooy D; Alais D Vision Res; 2009 Mar; 49(7):671-81. PubMed ID: 19232529 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Short-term monocular deprivation reduces inter-ocular suppression of the deprived eye. Wang M; McGraw P; Ledgeway T Vision Res; 2020 Aug; 173():29-40. PubMed ID: 32460171 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cross-orientation masking in human color vision: application of a two-stage model to assess dichoptic and monocular sources of suppression. Kim YJ; Gheiratmand M; Mullen KT J Vis; 2013 May; 13(6):15. PubMed ID: 23716122 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessing the generalizability of eye dominance across binocular rivalry, onset rivalry, and continuous flash suppression. Ding Y; Naber M; Gayet S; Van der Stigchel S; Paffen CLE J Vis; 2018 Jun; 18(6):6. PubMed ID: 30029217 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Eye swapping temporally modulates potency of continuous flash suppression. Shimizu M; Kimura E J Vis; 2020 Mar; 20(3):1. PubMed ID: 32181857 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Stimulus flicker alters interocular grouping during binocular rivalry. Knapen T; Paffen C; Kanai R; van Ee R Vision Res; 2007 Jan; 47(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 17083956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dichoptic visual masking reveals that early binocular neurons exhibit weak interocular suppression: implications for binocular vision and visual awareness. Macknik SL; Martinez-Conde S J Cogn Neurosci; 2004; 16(6):1049-59. PubMed ID: 15298791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Orientation-tuned suppression in binocular rivalry reveals general and specific components of rivalry suppression. Stuit SM; Cass J; Paffen CL; Alais D J Vis; 2009 Oct; 9(11):17.1-15. PubMed ID: 20053080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Psychophysical evidence for two routes to suppression before binocular summation of signals in human vision. Baker DH; Meese TS; Summers RJ Neuroscience; 2007 Apr; 146(1):435-48. PubMed ID: 17346895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Training of binocular rivalry suppression suggests stimulus-specific plasticity in monocular and binocular visual areas. Vergeer M; Wagemans J; van Ee R Sci Rep; 2016 May; 6():25753. PubMed ID: 27160838 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The dynamics of cross-orientation masking at monocular and interocular sites. Kim YJ; Mullen KT Vision Res; 2015 Nov; 116(Pt A):80-91. PubMed ID: 26452719 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Grouping of optic flow stimuli during binocular rivalry is driven by monocular information. Holten V; Stuit SM; Verstraten FAJ; van der Smagt MJ Vision Res; 2016 Oct; 127():84-91. PubMed ID: 27520852 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Local factors determine the stabilization of monocular ambiguous and binocular rivalry stimuli. Chen X; He S Curr Biol; 2004 Jun; 14(11):1013-7. PubMed ID: 15182676 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Nonlinear SSVEP responses are sensitive to the perceptual binding of visual hemifields during conventional 'eye' rivalry and interocular 'percept' rivalry. Sutoyo D; Srinivasan R Brain Res; 2009 Jan; 1251():245-55. PubMed ID: 18952069 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]