These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25720922)

  • 1. Assessment of Cesarean hysterotomy scar in non-pregnant women: reliability of transvaginal sonography with and without contrast enhancement.
    Baranov A; Gunnarsson G; Salvesen KÅ; Isberg PE; Vikhareva O
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Apr; 47(4):499-505. PubMed ID: 25720922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Agreement between transvaginal ultrasound and saline contrast sonohysterography in evaluation of cesarean scar defect.
    Rasheedy R; Sammour H; Elkholy A; Fadel E
    J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2019 Dec; 48(10):827-831. PubMed ID: 31077871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of Cesarean hysterotomy scar before pregnancy and at 11-14 weeks of gestation: a prospective cohort study.
    Baranov A; Salvesen KÅ; Vikhareva O
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jul; 50(1):105-109. PubMed ID: 27419374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hysterotomy level at Cesarean section and occurrence of large scar defects: a randomized single-blind trial.
    Vikhareva O; Rickle GS; Lavesson T; Nedopekina E; Brandell K; Salvesen KÅ
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Apr; 53(4):438-442. PubMed ID: 30484920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Visibility and measurement of cesarean section scars in pregnancy: a reproducibility study.
    Naji O; Daemen A; Smith A; Abdallah Y; Saso S; Stalder C; Sayasneh A; McIndoe A; Ghaem-Maghami S; Timmerman D; Bourne T
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Nov; 40(5):549-56. PubMed ID: 22323065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cesarean section scar defects: agreement between transvaginal sonographic findings with and without saline contrast enhancement.
    Osser OV; Jokubkiene L; Valentin L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Jan; 35(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 20034000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Association between ultrasonographic parameters of Cesarean scar defect and outcome of early termination of pregnancy.
    Au HK; Liu CF; Tzeng CR; Chien LW
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Apr; 47(4):506-10. PubMed ID: 25865778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cesarean section scar measurements in non-pregnant women using three-dimensional ultrasound: a repeatability study.
    Glavind J; Madsen LD; Uldbjerg N; Dueholm M
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Jun; 201():65-9. PubMed ID: 27064944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical importance of appearance of cesarean hysterotomy scar at transvaginal ultrasonography in nonpregnant women.
    Vikhareva Osser O; Valentin L
    Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Mar; 117(3):525-532. PubMed ID: 21343754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Validation of prediction model for successful vaginal birth after Cesarean delivery based on sonographic assessment of hysterotomy scar.
    Baranov A; Salvesen KÅ; Vikhareva O
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Feb; 51(2):189-193. PubMed ID: 28233347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reproducibility of three-dimensional ultrasound for the measurement of a niche in a caesarean scar and assessment of its shape.
    Marjolein Bij de Vaate AJ; Linskens IH; van der Voet LF; Twisk JW; Brölmann HA; Huirne JA
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 May; 188():39-44. PubMed ID: 25770846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Two-dimensional transvaginal sonography vs saline contrast sonohysterography for diagnosing endometrial polyps: systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Sanin-Ramirez D; Carriles I; Graupera B; Ajossa S; Neri M; Rodriguez I; Pascual MÁ; Guerriero S; Alcázar JL
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Oct; 56(4):506-515. PubMed ID: 32730635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Transvaginal Sonographic Evaluation of Cesarean Section Scar Niche in Pregnancy: A Prospective Longitudinal Study.
    Savukyne E; Machtejeviene E; Paskauskas S; Ramoniene G; Nadisauskiene RJ
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2021 Oct; 57(10):. PubMed ID: 34684128
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pilot study of MRI/ultrasound fusion imaging in postpartum assessment of Cesarean section scar.
    Bolten K; Fischer T; Bender YY; Diederichs G; Thomas A
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Oct; 50(4):520-526. PubMed ID: 27804175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Predicting successful vaginal birth after Cesarean section using a model based on Cesarean scar features examined by transvaginal sonography.
    Naji O; Wynants L; Smith A; Abdallah Y; Stalder C; Sayasneh A; McIndoe A; Ghaem-Maghami S; Van Huffel S; Van Calster B; Timmerman D; Bourne T
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Jun; 41(6):672-8. PubMed ID: 23371440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reliability of 3-dimensional transvaginal sonographic measurement of lower uterine segment thickness.
    Boutin A; Jastrow N; Roberge S; Chaillet N; Bérubé L; Brassard N; Girard M; Bujold E
    J Ultrasound Med; 2012 Jun; 31(6):933-9. PubMed ID: 22644690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cesarean Scar Thickness Decreases during Pregnancy: A Prospective Longitudinal Study.
    Savukyne E; Machtejeviene E; Kliucinskas M; Paskauskas S
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2022 Mar; 58(3):. PubMed ID: 35334583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Changes in Cesarean section scar dimensions during pregnancy: a prospective longitudinal study.
    Naji O; Daemen A; Smith A; Abdallah Y; Saso S; Stalder C; Sayasneh A; McIndoe A; Ghaem-Maghami S; Timmerman D; Bourne T
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 May; 41(5):556-62. PubMed ID: 23108803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ultrasound evaluation of Cesarean scar after single- and double-layer uterotomy closure: a cohort study.
    Glavind J; Madsen LD; Uldbjerg N; Dueholm M
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Aug; 42(2):207-12. PubMed ID: 23288683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reproducibility of saline contrast sonohysterography for the detection of intracavitary abnormalities in women with abnormal uterine bleeding.
    Beemsterboer SN; Thurkow AL; Verstraeten R; Brölmann HA
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Apr; 31(4):445-9. PubMed ID: 18383471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.