These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

70 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2572093)

  • 1. [Processing of a speech signal and thereby necessary attention: a contribution to dual performance].
    Lazarus-Mainka G; Arnold M; Tkocz N
    Z Psychol Z Angew Psychol; 1989; 197(2):171-85. PubMed ID: 2572093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pupil response as an indication of effortful listening: the influence of sentence intelligibility.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
    Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):480-90. PubMed ID: 20588118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of speech intelligibility level on concurrent visual task performance.
    Payne DG; Peters LJ; Birkmire DP; Bonto MA; Anastasi JS; Wenger MJ
    Hum Factors; 1994 Sep; 36(3):441-75. PubMed ID: 7989051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Listener ratings of the intelligibility of tracheoesophageal speech in noise.
    McColl D; Fucci D; Petrosino L; Martin DE; McCaffrey P
    J Commun Disord; 1998; 31(4):279-88; quiz 288-9. PubMed ID: 9697040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effects of hearing aid use on listening effort and mental fatigue associated with sustained speech processing demands.
    Hornsby BW
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):523-34. PubMed ID: 23426091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Development of the Listening in Spatialized Noise-Sentences Test (LISN-S).
    Cameron S; Dillon H
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):196-211. PubMed ID: 17496671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Development and evaluation of the listening in spatialized noise test.
    Cameron S; Dillon H; Newall P
    Ear Hear; 2006 Feb; 27(1):30-42. PubMed ID: 16446563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cognitive load during speech perception in noise: the influence of age, hearing loss, and cognition on the pupil response.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):498-510. PubMed ID: 21233711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Acceptable range of speech level in noisy sound fields for young adults and elderly persons.
    Sato H; Morimoto M; Ota R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1411-9. PubMed ID: 21895082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Rapid perceptual learning of noise-vocoded speech requires attention.
    Huyck JJ; Johnsrude IS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Mar; 131(3):EL236-42. PubMed ID: 22423814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Noise annoyance during the performance of different nonauditory tasks.
    Kjellberg A; Sköldström B
    Percept Mot Skills; 1991 Aug; 73(1):39-49. PubMed ID: 1945718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Spectral enhancement to improve the intelligibility of speech in noise for hearing-impaired listeners.
    Simpson AM; Moore BC; Glasberg BR
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1990; 469():101-7. PubMed ID: 2356717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The influence of semantically related and unrelated text cues on the intelligibility of sentences in noise.
    Zekveld AA; Rudner M; Johnsrude IS; Festen JM; van Beek JH; Rönnberg J
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(6):e16-25. PubMed ID: 21826004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Speech-in-noise measures: variable versus fixed speech and noise levels.
    Wilson RH; McArdle R
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Sep; 51(9):708-12. PubMed ID: 22640687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intelligibility of speech in noise at high presentation levels: effects of hearing loss and frequency region.
    Summers V; Cord MT
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Aug; 122(2):1130-7. PubMed ID: 17672659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An investigation of input level range for the nucleus 24 cochlear implant system: speech perception performance, program preference, and loudness comfort ratings.
    James CJ; Skinner MW; Martin LF; Holden LK; Galvin KL; Holden TA; Whitford L
    Ear Hear; 2003 Apr; 24(2):157-74. PubMed ID: 12677112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Objective measures of listening effort: effects of background noise and noise reduction.
    Sarampalis A; Kalluri S; Edwards B; Hafter E
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2009 Oct; 52(5):1230-40. PubMed ID: 19380604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Predicting speech intelligibility based on the signal-to-noise envelope power ratio after modulation-frequency selective processing.
    Jørgensen S; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1475-87. PubMed ID: 21895088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Influence of disturbing noise on sentence intelligibility (author's transl)].
    Welzl-Müller K
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1981 Mar; 60(3):117-20. PubMed ID: 7230993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of noise envelope modulation on quality judgments of noisy speech.
    Jin IK; Kates JM; Arehart KH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):EL277-83. PubMed ID: 23039565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.