These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Best technique for obtaining wound cultures. Spear M Plast Surg Nurs; 2012; 32(1):34-6. PubMed ID: 22395174 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Infection control: validity and reliability in wound swabbing. Kelly F Br J Nurs; 2003 Sep 11-24; 12(16):959-60, 962-4. PubMed ID: 14508419 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The clinical efficacy of two semi-quantitative wound-swabbing techniques in identifying the causative organism(s) in infected cutaneous wounds. Angel DE; Lloyd P; Carville K; Santamaria N Int Wound J; 2011 Apr; 8(2):176-85. PubMed ID: 21303456 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bacterial swabs and the chronic wound: when, how, and what do they mean? Dow G Ostomy Wound Manage; 2003 May; 49(5A Suppl):8-13. PubMed ID: 12883159 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Rapid enzyme analysis as a diagnostic tool for wound infection: Comparison between clinical judgment, microbiological analysis, and enzyme analysis. Blokhuis-Arkes MH; Haalboom M; van der Palen J; Heinzle A; Sigl E; Guebitz G; Beuk R Wound Repair Regen; 2015; 23(3):345-52. PubMed ID: 25816836 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Microbial diversity in chronic open wounds. Frank DN; Wysocki A; Specht-Glick DD; Rooney A; Feldman RA; St Amand AL; Pace NR; Trent JD Wound Repair Regen; 2009; 17(2):163-72. PubMed ID: 19320883 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Application of microbiological quantitative methods for evaluation of changes in the amount of bacteria in patients with wounds and purulent fistulas subjected to phage therapy and for assessment of phage preparation effectiveness (in vitro studies). Lecion D; Fortuna W; Dąbrowska K; Międzybrodzki R; Weber-Dąbrowska B; Górski A Adv Med Sci; 2013; 58(2):257-64. PubMed ID: 24216162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Swab versus biopsy for the diagnosis of chronic infected wounds. Rondas AA; Schols JM; Halfens RJ; Stobberingh EE Adv Skin Wound Care; 2013 May; 26(5):211-9. PubMed ID: 23591095 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diagnostic validity of three swab techniques for identifying chronic wound infection. Gardner SE; Frantz RA; Saltzman CL; Hillis SL; Park H; Scherubel M Wound Repair Regen; 2006; 14(5):548-57. PubMed ID: 17014666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Wound fluid in diabetic foot ulceration: more than just an undefined soup? Löffler MW; Schuster H; Bühler S; Beckert S Int J Low Extrem Wounds; 2013 Jun; 12(2):113-29. PubMed ID: 23771612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Taking a wound swab. Gilchrist B Nurs Times; 2000 Jan 27-Feb 2; 96(4 Suppl):2. PubMed ID: 10827731 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. No need for biopsies: comparison of three sample techniques for wound microbiota determination. Gjødsbøl K; Skindersoe ME; Christensen JJ; Karlsmark T; Jørgensen B; Jensen AM; Klein BM; Sonnested MK; Krogfelt KA Int Wound J; 2012 Jun; 9(3):295-302. PubMed ID: 22067000 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Wound infection and wound swabbing. Donovan S Prof Nurse; 1998 Aug; 13(11):757-9. PubMed ID: 9782990 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Practical bacteriologic monitoring of the burn victim. Edlich RF; Rodeheaver GT; Spengler M; Herbert J; Edgerton MT Clin Plast Surg; 1977 Oct; 4(4):561-9. PubMed ID: 334446 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]