182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25722185)
1. Researcher fails in legal bid to halt expression of concern by journal Diabetes.
Dyer O
BMJ; 2015 Feb; 350():h1112. PubMed ID: 25722185
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Highly cited researcher banned from journal board for citation abuse.
Van Noorden R
Nature; 2020 Feb; 578(7794):200-201. PubMed ID: 32047304
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Retracted paper rattles Korean science.
Cyranoski D
Nature; 2009 Apr; 458(7238):561. PubMed ID: 19340046
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Further accusations rock Japanese RNA laboratory.
Fuyuno I
Nature; 2006 Apr; 440(7085):720-1. PubMed ID: 16598217
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Correcting the scientific record.
Nat Chem Biol; 2008 Jul; 4(7):381. PubMed ID: 18560424
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. China introduces sweeping reforms to crack down on academic misconduct.
Cyranoski D
Nature; 2018 Jun; 558(7709):171. PubMed ID: 29895918
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Scientific misconduct and correcting the scientific literature.
Parrish DM
Acad Med; 1999 Mar; 74(3):221-30. PubMed ID: 10099640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Nature group journal retracts two papers after cancer researcher was found to have falsified data.
Siva N
BMJ; 2011 Aug; 343():d5218. PubMed ID: 21844161
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A major failure of scientific governance.
Smith R; Godlee F
BMJ; 2015 Oct; 351():h5694. PubMed ID: 26514391
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Scientific misconduct: Research integrity guidelines in Japan.
Wada M
Nature; 2014 Oct; 514(7520):35. PubMed ID: 25279908
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Prominent Canadian researcher loses libel case against documentary makers.
Dyer O
BMJ; 2015 Jul; 351():h4129. PubMed ID: 26228946
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Behind the scenes of scientific articles: defining categories of fraud and regulating cases].
Pontille D; Torny D
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2012 Aug; 60(4):247-53. PubMed ID: 22819062
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Federal agencies can do more to ensure correction of the literature when research misconduct is found.
Parrish DM
Account Res; 2018; 25(6):370-372. PubMed ID: 30064271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Researcher sues government and specific agency official over misconduct investigation.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2001 Feb; 16(2):9. PubMed ID: 12530382
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Updates to policies and procedures related to potential scientific and academic misconduct in the journals of the American Diabetes Association.
Kohler CS;
Diabetes; 2012 Jan; 61(1):38-9. PubMed ID: 22187374
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Due process in investigations of research misconduct.
Mello MM; Brennan TA
N Engl J Med; 2003 Sep; 349(13):1280-6. PubMed ID: 14507953
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Penalties plus high-quality review to fight plagiarism.
Wittmaack K
Nature; 2005 Jul; 436(7047):24. PubMed ID: 16001039
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Fraud in scientific research: the prosecutor's approach.
Willcox BL
Account Res; 1992; 2(2):139-51. PubMed ID: 16144093
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Using criminalization and due process to reduce scientific misconduct.
Sovacool BK
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(5):W1-7. PubMed ID: 16179287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Misconduct? It's all academic..
Nature; 2007 Jan; 445(7125):240-1. PubMed ID: 17230159
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
