386 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25723187)
1. In-vivo assessment of femoral bone strength using Finite Element Analysis (FEA) based on routine MDCT imaging: a preliminary study on patients with vertebral fractures.
Liebl H; Garcia EG; Holzner F; Noel PB; Burgkart R; Rummeny EJ; Baum T; Bauer JS
PLoS One; 2015; 10(2):e0116907. PubMed ID: 25723187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Vertebral and femoral bone mineral density and bone strength in prostate cancer patients assessed in phantomless PET/CT examinations.
Schwaiger BJ; Kopperdahl DL; Nardo L; Facchetti L; Gersing AS; Neumann J; Lee KJ; Keaveny TM; Link TM
Bone; 2017 Aug; 101():62-69. PubMed ID: 28442297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Perspectives on the non-invasive evaluation of femoral strength in the assessment of hip fracture risk.
Bouxsein ML; Zysset P; Glüer CC; McClung M; Biver E; Pierroz DD; Ferrari SL;
Osteoporos Int; 2020 Mar; 31(3):393-408. PubMed ID: 31900541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bone mineral density measurements of the proximal femur from routine contrast-enhanced MDCT data sets correlate with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.
Gruber M; Bauer JS; Dobritz M; Beer AJ; Wolf P; Woertler K; Rummeny EJ; Baum T
Eur Radiol; 2013 Feb; 23(2):505-12. PubMed ID: 22932742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prediction of incident vertebral fractures in routine MDCT: Comparison of global texture features, 3D finite element parameters and volumetric BMD.
Dieckmeyer M; Rayudu NM; Yeung LY; Löffler M; Sekuboyina A; Burian E; Sollmann N; Kirschke JS; Baum T; Subburaj K
Eur J Radiol; 2021 Aug; 141():109827. PubMed ID: 34225250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Are DXA/aBMD and QCT/FEA Stiffness and Strength Estimates Sensitive to Sex and Age?
Rezaei A; Giambini H; Rossman T; Carlson KD; Yaszemski MJ; Lu L; Dragomir-Daescu D
Ann Biomed Eng; 2017 Dec; 45(12):2847-2856. PubMed ID: 28940110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prediction of incident vertebral fracture using CT-based finite element analysis.
Allaire BT; Lu D; Johannesdottir F; Kopperdahl D; Keaveny TM; Jarraya M; Guermazi A; Bredella MA; Samelson EJ; Kiel DP; Anderson DE; Demissie S; Bouxsein ML
Osteoporos Int; 2019 Feb; 30(2):323-331. PubMed ID: 30306225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prediction of fracture load and stiffness of the proximal femur by CT-based specimen specific finite element analysis: cadaveric validation study.
Miura M; Nakamura J; Matsuura Y; Wako Y; Suzuki T; Hagiwara S; Orita S; Inage K; Kawarai Y; Sugano M; Nawata K; Ohtori S
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2017 Dec; 18(1):536. PubMed ID: 29246133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Measurement of bone mineral density at the spine and proximal femur by volumetric quantitative computed tomography and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in elderly women with and without vertebral fractures.
Lang TF; Guglielmi G; van Kuijk C; De Serio A; Cammisa M; Genant HK
Bone; 2002 Jan; 30(1):247-50. PubMed ID: 11792593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Vertebral Fracture Risk Thresholds from Phantom-Less Quantitative Computed Tomography-Based Finite Element Modeling Correlate to Phantom-Based Outcomes.
Prado M; Khosla S; Giambini H
J Clin Densitom; 2024; 27(1):101465. PubMed ID: 38183962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fractal analysis of radiographic trabecular bone texture and bone mineral density: two complementary parameters related to osteoporotic fractures.
Benhamou CL; Poupon S; Lespessailles E; Loiseau S; Jennane R; Siroux V; Ohley W; Pothuaud L
J Bone Miner Res; 2001 Apr; 16(4):697-704. PubMed ID: 11315997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. High resolution quantitative computed tomography-based assessment of trabecular microstructure and strength estimates by finite-element analysis of the spine, but not DXA, reflects vertebral fracture status in men with glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis.
Graeff C; Marin F; Petto H; Kayser O; Reisinger A; Peña J; Zysset P; Glüer CC
Bone; 2013 Feb; 52(2):568-77. PubMed ID: 23149277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prediction of Hip Failure Load: In Vitro Study of 80 Femurs Using Three Imaging Methods and Finite Element Models-The European Fracture Study (EFFECT).
Pottecher P; Engelke K; Duchemin L; Museyko O; Moser T; Mitton D; Vicaut E; Adams J; Skalli W; Laredo JD; Bousson V
Radiology; 2016 Sep; 280(3):837-47. PubMed ID: 27077380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Automated DXA-based finite element analysis for hip fracture risk stratification: a cross-sectional study.
Yang S; Leslie WD; Luo Y; Goertzen AL; Ahmed S; Ward LM; Delubac I; Lix LM
Osteoporos Int; 2018 Jan; 29(1):191-200. PubMed ID: 29038836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. DXA predictions of human femoral mechanical properties depend on the load configuration.
Dall'Ara E; Luisier B; Schmidt R; Pretterklieber M; Kainberger F; Zysset P; Pahr D
Med Eng Phys; 2013 Nov; 35(11):1564-72; discussion 1564. PubMed ID: 23684578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of 3D finite element analysis derived stiffness and BMD to determine the failure load of the excised proximal femur.
Langton CM; Pisharody S; Keyak JH
Med Eng Phys; 2009 Jul; 31(6):668-72. PubMed ID: 19230742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of incident spine and hip fractures in women and men using finite element analysis of CT scans.
Kopperdahl DL; Aspelund T; Hoffmann PF; Sigurdsson S; Siggeirsdottir K; Harris TB; Gudnason V; Keaveny TM
J Bone Miner Res; 2014 Mar; 29(3):570-80. PubMed ID: 23956027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Study of stress variations in single-stance and sideways fall using image-based finite element analysis.
Faisal TR; Luo Y
Biomed Mater Eng; 2016 May; 27(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 27175463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Proximal Cadaveric Femur Preparation for Fracture Strength Testing and Quantitative CT-based Finite Element Analysis.
Dragomir-Daescu D; Rezaei A; Uthamaraj S; Rossman T; Bronk JT; Bolander M; Lambert V; McEligot S; Entwistle R; Giambini H; Jasiuk I; Yaszemski MJ; Lu L
J Vis Exp; 2017 Mar; (121):. PubMed ID: 28362373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Relationships between femoral strength evaluated by nonlinear finite element analysis and BMD, material distribution and geometric morphology.
Gong H; Zhang M; Fan Y; Kwok WL; Leung PC
Ann Biomed Eng; 2012 Jul; 40(7):1575-85. PubMed ID: 22258889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
