165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25723686)
21. Multicenter comparative study of open, laparoscopic, and robotic pyeloplasty in the pediatric population for the treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO).
González ST; Rosito TE; Tur AB; Ruiz J; Gozalbez R; Maiolo A; Tavares PM; Gorgen ARH; de Kencht EL; Madarriaga YQ; Weller S; Tobia IP; Castellan M; Corbetta JP
Int Braz J Urol; 2022; 48(6):961-968. PubMed ID: 36083265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Laparoscopy versus robotic-assisted pyeloplasty in children: preliminary results of a pilot prospective randomized controlled trial.
Silay MS; Danacioglu O; Ozel K; Karaman MI; Caskurlu T
World J Urol; 2020 Aug; 38(8):1841-1848. PubMed ID: 31435732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Failed pyeloplasty in children: Is robot-assisted laparoscopic reoperative repair feasible?
Asensio M; Gander R; Royo GF; Lloret J
J Pediatr Urol; 2015 Apr; 11(2):69.e1-6. PubMed ID: 25791423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Secondary Management for Recurrent Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction after Pyeloplasty: A Comparison of Re-Do Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty and Conventional Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty.
Zhang Y; Ouyang W; Xu H; Luan Y; Yang J; Lu Y; Hu J; Liu Z; Yu X; Guan W; Hu Z; Ye Z; Wang S; Li H
Urol Int; 2019; 103(4):466-472. PubMed ID: 31537001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Robotic versus open pyeloplasty in pediatric patients: a single center experience in Saudi Arabia.
Junejo NN; Vallasciani S; Alshammari A; Aljallad H; Alshahrani S; Abasher A; Almathami A; Alhazmi H
Minerva Urol Nefrol; 2018 Oct; 70(5):486-493. PubMed ID: 29856170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A systematic review and meta-analysis of conventional laparoscopic versus robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in infants.
Chandrasekharam VVS; Babu R
J Pediatr Urol; 2021 Aug; 17(4):502-510. PubMed ID: 33812779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: Initial experience with 3D vision laparoscopy and articulating shears.
Abou-Haidar H; Al-Qaoud T; Jednak R; Brzezinski A; El-Sherbiny M; Capolicchio JP
J Pediatr Urol; 2016 Dec; 12(6):426.e1-426.e5. PubMed ID: 27889223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Outcomes of externalized pyeloureteral versus internal ureteral stent in pediatric robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty.
Chu DI; Shrivastava D; Van Batavia JP; Bowen DK; Tong CC; Long CJ; Weiss DA; Shukla AR; Srinivasan AK
J Pediatr Urol; 2018 Oct; 14(5):450.e1-450.e6. PubMed ID: 29776869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of intraoperative and short-term postoperative outcomes between robot-assisted laparoscopic multi-port pyeloplasty using the da Vinci Si system and single-port pyeloplasty using the da Vinci SP system in children.
Kang SK; Jang WS; Kim SH; Kim SW; Han SW; Lee YS
Investig Clin Urol; 2021 Sep; 62(5):592-599. PubMed ID: 34387035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Does the use of 5 mm instruments affect the outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in smaller working spaces? A comparative analysis of infants and older children.
Baek M; Silay MS; Au JK; Huang GO; Elizondo RA; Puttmann KT; Janzen NK; Seth A; Roth DR; Koh CJ
J Pediatr Urol; 2018 Dec; 14(6):537.e1-537.e6. PubMed ID: 30007500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in infants and children: is it superior to conventional laparoscopy?
Andolfi C; Adamic B; Oommen J; Gundeti MS
World J Urol; 2020 Aug; 38(8):1827-1833. PubMed ID: 31506749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children: a systematic review.
Masieri L; Sforza S; Grosso AA; Valastro F; Tellini R; Cini C; Landi L; Taverna M; Elia A; Mantovani A; Minervini A; Carini M
Minerva Urol Nefrol; 2020 Dec; 72(6):673-690. PubMed ID: 32748621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Retroperitoneal Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty: A 10 Year Experience in a Single Institution.
Whiting D; Whitehurst L; Tsang D; Hussain M; Malki M; Barber N
J Endourol; 2022 May; 36(5):615-619. PubMed ID: 34931543
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty versus open pyeloplasty for recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children.
Abdel-Karim AM; Fahmy A; Moussa A; Rashad H; Elbadry M; Badawy H; Hammady A
J Pediatr Urol; 2016 Dec; 12(6):401.e1-401.e6. PubMed ID: 27614698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The learning curve of robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children: a multi-outcome approach.
Kassite I; Braik K; Villemagne T; Lardy H; Binet A
J Pediatr Urol; 2018 Dec; 14(6):570.e1-570.e10. PubMed ID: 30177385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A systematic review and metaanalysis of open, conventional laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic techniques for re-do pyeloplasty for recurrent uretero pelvic junction obstruction in children.
Chandrasekharam VVS; Babu R
J Pediatr Urol; 2022 Oct; 18(5):642-649. PubMed ID: 36117037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Surgical outcomes are equivalent after pure laparoscopic and robotic-assisted pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
Ebert KM; Nicassio L; Alpert SA; Ching CB; Dajusta DG; Fuchs ME; McLeod DJ; Jayanthi VR
J Pediatr Urol; 2020 Dec; 16(6):845.e1-845.e6. PubMed ID: 33060019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Infant Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty: Outcomes at a Single Institution, and Tips for Safety and Success.
Andolfi C; Rodríguez VM; Galansky L; Gundeti MS
Eur Urol; 2021 Nov; 80(5):621-631. PubMed ID: 34247895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Long-term Outcomes of Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction.
Hopf HL; Bahler CD; Sundaram CP
Urology; 2016 Apr; 90():106-10. PubMed ID: 26801810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A prospective randomised comparison between the transperitoneal and retroperitoneoscopic approaches for robotic-assisted pyeloplasty in a single surgeon, single centre study.
Khoder WY; Waidelich R; Ghamdi AMA; Schulz T; Becker A; Stief CG
J Robot Surg; 2018 Mar; 12(1):131-137. PubMed ID: 28534190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
