These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25723953)

  • 1. Regional ozone impacts of increased natural gas use in the Texas power sector and development in the Eagle Ford shale.
    Pacsi AP; Kimura Y; McGaughey G; McDonald-Buller EC; Allen DT
    Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Mar; 49(6):3966-73. PubMed ID: 25723953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Expected ozone benefits of reducing nitrogen oxide (NO
    Vinciguerra T; Bull E; Canty T; He H; Zalewsky E; Woodman M; Aburn G; Ehrman S; Dickerson RR
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2017 Mar; 67(3):279-291. PubMed ID: 27650304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Regional air quality impacts of increased natural gas production and use in Texas.
    Pacsi AP; Alhajeri NS; Zavala-Araiza D; Webster MD; Allen DT
    Environ Sci Technol; 2013 Apr; 47(7):3521-7. PubMed ID: 23441728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Statistical evaluation of the impact of shale gas activities on ozone pollution in North Texas.
    Ahmadi M; John K
    Sci Total Environ; 2015 Dec; 536():457-467. PubMed ID: 26232756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Recent increases in nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from coal-fired electric generating units equipped with selective catalytic reduction.
    McNevin TF
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2016 Jan; 66(1):66-75. PubMed ID: 26563500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ozone impacts of natural gas development in the Haynesville Shale.
    Kemball-Cook S; Bar-Ilan A; Grant J; Parker L; Jung J; Santamaria W; Mathews J; Yarwood G
    Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Dec; 44(24):9357-63. PubMed ID: 21086985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Air quality and health benefits from potential coal power plant closures in Texas.
    Strasert B; Teh SC; Cohan DS
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2019 Mar; 69(3):333-350. PubMed ID: 30339492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Microscale air quality impacts of distributed power generation facilities.
    Olaguer EP; Knipping E; Shaw S; Ravindran S
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2016 Aug; 66(8):795-806. PubMed ID: 27191342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dynamic Management of NOx and SO2 Emissions in the Texas and Mid-Atlantic Electric Power Systems and Implications for Air Quality.
    McDonald-Buller E; Kimura Y; Craig M; McGaughey G; Allen D; Webster M
    Environ Sci Technol; 2016 Feb; 50(3):1611-9. PubMed ID: 26727552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Spatially and Temporally Resolved Analysis of Environmental Trade-Offs in Electricity Generation.
    Peer RA; Garrison JB; Timms CP; Sanders KT
    Environ Sci Technol; 2016 Apr; 50(8):4537-45. PubMed ID: 26967826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Implications of the recent reductions in natural gas prices for emissions of CO2 from the US power sector.
    Lu X; Salovaara J; McElroy MB
    Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Mar; 46(5):3014-21. PubMed ID: 22321206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessing Human Health PM
    Fann N; Baker KR; Chan EAW; Eyth A; Macpherson A; Miller E; Snyder J
    Environ Sci Technol; 2018 Aug; 52(15):8095-8103. PubMed ID: 30004688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of emissions from natural gas production facilities on ambient air quality in the Barnett Shale area: a pilot study.
    Zielinska B; Campbell D; Samburova V
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2014 Dec; 64(12):1369-83. PubMed ID: 25562933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Emissions impacts of wind and energy storage in a market environment.
    Sioshansi R
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Dec; 45(24):10728-35. PubMed ID: 22044253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Updated methods for assessing the impacts of nearby gas drilling and production on neighborhood air quality and human health.
    Olaguer EP; Erickson M; Wijesinghe A; Neish B; Williams J; Colvin J
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2016 Feb; 66(2):173-83. PubMed ID: 26284986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Characterizing ozone pollution in a petrochemical industrial area in Beijing, China: a case study using a chemical reaction model.
    Wei W; Lv Z; Cheng S; Wang L; Ji D; Zhou Y; Han L; Wang L
    Environ Monit Assess; 2015 Jun; 187(6):377. PubMed ID: 26013656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Atmospheric hydrocarbon emissions and concentrations in the barnett shale natural gas production region.
    Zavala-Araiza D; Sullivan DW; Allen DT
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 May; 48(9):5314-21. PubMed ID: 24712292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The potential near-source ozone impacts of upstream oil and gas industry emissions.
    Olaguer EP
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2012 Aug; 62(8):966-77. PubMed ID: 22916444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Air quality concerns of unconventional oil and natural gas production.
    Field RA; Soltis J; Murphy S
    Environ Sci Process Impacts; 2014 May; 16(5):954-69. PubMed ID: 24699994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Do shale oil and gas production activities impact ambient air quality? A comprehensive study of 12 years of chemical concentrations and well production data from the Barnett Shale region of Texas.
    Lange SS; Shrestha L; Nnoli N; Aniagu S; Rawat S; McCant D
    Environ Int; 2023 May; 175():107930. PubMed ID: 37086492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.