408 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25724115)
21. Combined Near-Infrarred Light Transillumination and Direct Digital Radiography Increases Diagnostic In Approximal Caries.
Melo M; Pascual A; Camps I; Ata-Ali F; Ata-Ali J
Sci Rep; 2019 Oct; 9(1):14224. PubMed ID: 31578410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The effect of surface defects in early caries assessment using quantitative light-induced fluorescence (QLF) and micro-digital-photography (MDP).
Meharry MR; Dawson D; Wefel JS; Harless JD; Kummet CM; Xiao X
J Dent; 2012 Nov; 40(11):955-61. PubMed ID: 22892465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A new screening method to detect proximal dental caries using fluorescence imaging.
Kim ES; Lee ES; Kang SM; Jung EH; de Josselin de Jong E; Jung HI; Kim BI
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther; 2017 Dec; 20():257-262. PubMed ID: 29079349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Detection of Caries Around Amalgam Restorations on Approximal Surfaces.
Diniz MB; Cordeiro RC; Ferreira-Zandona AG
Oper Dent; 2016; 41(1):34-43. PubMed ID: 26237637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Performance of a fluorescence camera for detection of occlusal caries in vitro.
Jablonski-Momeni A; Schipper HM; Rosen SM; Heinzel-Gutenbrunner M; Roggendorf MJ; Stoll R; Stachniss V; Pieper K
Odontology; 2011 Jan; 99(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 21271327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Clinical performance of two fluorescence-based methods in detecting occlusal caries lesions in primary teeth.
Matos R; Novaes TF; Braga MM; Siqueira WL; Duarte DA; Mendes FM
Caries Res; 2011; 45(3):294-302. PubMed ID: 21625126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Clinical performance of ICDAS II, radiovisiography, and alternating current impedance spectroscopy device for the detection and assessment of occlusal caries in primary molars.
Singh R; Tandon S; Rathore M; Tewari N; Singh N; Shitoot AP
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2016; 34(2):152-8. PubMed ID: 27080966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The reliability and accuracy of two methods for proximal caries detection and depth on directly visible proximal surfaces: an in vitro study.
Ekstrand KR; Luna LE; Promisiero L; Cortes A; Cuevas S; Reyes JF; Torres CE; Martignon S
Caries Res; 2011; 45(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 21412000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The diagnostic accuracy of a laser fluorescence device and digital radiography in detecting approximal caries lesions in posterior permanent teeth: an in vivo study.
Menem R; Barngkgei I; Beiruti N; Al Haffar I; Joury E
Lasers Med Sci; 2017 Apr; 32(3):621-628. PubMed ID: 28194533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Clinical performance of fluorescence-based methods for detection of occlusal caries lesions in primary teeth.
Pontes LRA; Novaes TF; Moro BLP; Braga MM; Mendes FM
Braz Oral Res; 2017 Nov; 31():e91. PubMed ID: 29116301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Assessing caries removal by undergraduate dental students using quantitative light-induced fluorescence.
Adeyemi AA; Jarad FD; Komarov GN; Pender N; Higham SM
J Dent Educ; 2008 Nov; 72(11):1318-23. PubMed ID: 18981210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Monitoring enamel caries on resin-treated occlusal surfaces using quantitative light-induced fluorescence: an in vitro study.
Silva FG; Freitas PM; Mendes FM; de Novaes TF; Diniz MB; Oliveira Guaré R
Lasers Med Sci; 2020 Sep; 35(7):1629-1636. PubMed ID: 32382936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Performance of fluorescence-based and conventional methods of occlusal caries detection in primary molars - an in vitro study.
Novaes TF; Matos R; Gimenez T; Braga MM; DE Benedetto MS; Mendes FM
Int J Paediatr Dent; 2012 Nov; 22(6):459-66. PubMed ID: 22276618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of quantitative light-induced fluorescence, digital photography and transverse microradiography for quantification of enamel remineralization.
Cochrane NJ; Walker GD; Manton DJ; Reynolds EC
Aust Dent J; 2012 Sep; 57(3):271-6. PubMed ID: 22924348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Variables affecting the inter- and intra-examiner reliability of ICDAS for occlusal caries diagnosis in permanent molars.
Qudeimat MA; Alomari QD; Altarakemah Y; Alshawaf N; Honkala EJ
J Public Health Dent; 2016; 76(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 26095924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Effect of Different Contact Materials on Approximal Caries Detection by Laser Fluorescence and Light-Emitting Diode Devices.
Ozsevik AS; Kararslan ES; Aktan AM; Bozdemir E; Cebe F; Sarı F
Photomed Laser Surg; 2015 Oct; 33(10):492-7. PubMed ID: 26352346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Detection of cavitated or non-cavitated approximal enamel caries lesions using CMOS and CCD digital X-ray sensors and conventional D and F-speed films at different exposure conditions.
Bottenberg P; Jacquet W; Stachniss V; Wellnitz J; Schulte AG
Am J Dent; 2011 Apr; 24(2):74-8. PubMed ID: 21698985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Detection and Analysis of Enamel Cracks by Quantitative Light-induced Fluorescence Technology.
Jun MK; Ku HM; Kim E; Kim HE; Kwon HK; Kim BI
J Endod; 2016 Mar; 42(3):500-4. PubMed ID: 26794344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Influence of contact points on the performance of caries detection methods in approximal surfaces of primary molars: an in vivo study.
Ribeiro AA; Purger F; Rodrigues JA; Oliveira PR; Lussi A; Monteiro AH; Alves HD; Assis JT; Vasconcellos AB
Caries Res; 2015; 49(2):99-108. PubMed ID: 25572115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A comparative study of different radiographic methods for detecting occlusal caries lesions.
Tarım Ertas E; Küçükyılmaz E; Ertaş H; Savaş S; Yırcalı Atıcı M
Caries Res; 2014; 48(6):566-74. PubMed ID: 25073755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
