These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25726014)

  • 1. What you need to know about statistics, part II: reliability of diagnostic and screening tests.
    Zidan M; Thomas RL; Slovis TL
    Pediatr Radiol; 2015 Mar; 45(3):317-28. PubMed ID: 25726014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. What you need to know about statistics Part I: validity of diagnostic and screening tests.
    Thomas RL; Zidan MA; Slovis TL
    Pediatr Radiol; 2015 Feb; 45(2):146-52. PubMed ID: 25636704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Agreement Analysis: What He Said, She Said Versus You Said.
    Vetter TR; Schober P
    Anesth Analg; 2018 Jun; 126(6):2123-2128. PubMed ID: 29677066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Asymptotic distributions of kappa statistics and their differences with many raters, many rating categories and two conditions.
    Grassano L; Pagana G; Daperno M; Bibbona E; Gasparini M
    Biom J; 2018 Jan; 60(1):146-154. PubMed ID: 29110316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Design and analysis of a study on reliability and validity of diagnostic tests in urological clinical research].
    Fernández Pérez C; Moreno Sierra J; Barreales Tolosa L; Ramírez de Molina V
    Arch Esp Urol; 2003; 56(6):645-56. PubMed ID: 12958999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A spreadsheet for the calculation of comprehensive statistics for the assessment of diagnostic tests and inter-rater agreement.
    Mackinnon A
    Comput Biol Med; 2000 May; 30(3):127-34. PubMed ID: 10758228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reliability of assessment tools in rehabilitation: an illustration of appropriate statistical analyses.
    Rankin G; Stokes M
    Clin Rehabil; 1998 Jun; 12(3):187-99. PubMed ID: 9688034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparing two diagnostic tests against the same "gold standard" in the same sample.
    Bloch DA
    Biometrics; 1997 Mar; 53(1):73-85. PubMed ID: 9147604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. When do latent class models overstate accuracy for diagnostic and other classifiers in the absence of a gold standard?
    Spencer BD
    Biometrics; 2012 Jun; 68(2):559-66. PubMed ID: 22017371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of a wearable body monitoring device during treadmill walking and jogging in patients with fibromyalgia syndrome.
    Munguía-Izquierdo D; Santalla A; Legaz-Arrese A
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2012 Jan; 93(1):115-22. PubMed ID: 22200390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Nonparametric methods for analysing the accuracy of diagnostic tests with multiple readers.
    Kaufmann J; Werner C; Brunner E
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2005 Apr; 14(2):129-46. PubMed ID: 15807148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Statistical methodology: II. Reliability and variability assessment in study design, Part A.
    Karras DJ
    Acad Emerg Med; 1997 Jan; 4(1):64-71. PubMed ID: 9110015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessing inter-rater reliability when the raters are fixed: Two concepts and two estimates.
    Rousson V
    Biom J; 2011 May; 53(3):477-90. PubMed ID: 21425184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reliability, Validity, and Minimal Detectable Change of Balance Evaluation Systems Test and Its Short Versions in Older Cancer Survivors: A Pilot Study.
    Huang MH; Miller K; Smith K; Fredrickson K; Shilling T
    J Geriatr Phys Ther; 2016; 39(2):58-63. PubMed ID: 25695466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Guidelines for measurement validation in clinical trial design.
    Sanchez MM; Binkowitz BS
    J Biopharm Stat; 1999 Aug; 9(3):417-38. PubMed ID: 10473029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Observer reliability of arteriovenous malformations grading scales using current imaging modalities.
    Griessenauer CJ; Miller JH; Agee BS; Fisher WS; Curé JK; Chapman PR; Foreman PM; Fisher WA; Witcher AC; Walters BC
    J Neurosurg; 2014 May; 120(5):1179-87. PubMed ID: 24628617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Study design for the evaluation of diagnostic tests.
    Daya S
    Semin Reprod Endocrinol; 1996 May; 14(2):101-9. PubMed ID: 8796932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessing agreement with multiple raters on correlated kappa statistics.
    Cao H; Sen PK; Peery AF; Dellon ES
    Biom J; 2016 Jul; 58(4):935-43. PubMed ID: 26890370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reliability of diagnostic tests.
    Gjørup T
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl; 1997; 166():9-14. PubMed ID: 9253371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reliability and validity of a low load endurance strength test for upper and lower extremities in patients with fibromyalgia.
    Munguía-Izquierdo D; Legaz-Arrese A
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2012 Nov; 93(11):2035-41. PubMed ID: 22480547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.