298 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25727164)
1. [Ultrasonographic score for predicting vaginal delivery within 24h of induction: a pilot study].
Ancel J; Huissoud C
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2015 Mar; 43(3):256-61. PubMed ID: 25727164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ultrasound assessment of fetal head-perineum distance before induction of labor.
Eggebø TM; Heien C; Økland I; Gjessing LK; Romundstad P; Salvesen KA
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Aug; 32(2):199-204. PubMed ID: 18528923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Transvaginal sonography of the uterine cervix prior to labor induction.
Gabriel R; Darnaud T; Chalot F; Gonzalez N; Leymarie F; Quereux C
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Mar; 19(3):254-7. PubMed ID: 11896946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pre-induction translabial ultrasound measurements in predicting mode of delivery compared to bishop score: a cross-sectional study.
Khazardoost S; Ghotbizadeh Vahdani F; Latifi S; Borna S; Tahani M; Rezaei MA; Shafaat M
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2016 Oct; 16(1):330. PubMed ID: 27793113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Transvaginal sonographic measurement of cervical length vs. Bishop score in labor induction at term: tolerability and prediction of Cesarean delivery.
Tan PC; Vallikkannu N; Suguna S; Quek KF; Hassan J
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2007 May; 29(5):568-73. PubMed ID: 17444553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Labor progress determined by ultrasound is different in women requiring cesarean delivery from those who experience a vaginal delivery following induction of labor.
Tse WT; Chaemsaithong P; Chan WWY; Kwan AHW; Huang J; Appiah K; Chong KC; Poon LC
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Oct; 221(4):335.e1-335.e18. PubMed ID: 31153931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bishop Score vs. ultrasound cervical length in the prediction of cervical ripening success and vaginal delivery in nulliparous women.
Kehila M; Bougmiza I; Ben Hmid R; Abdelfatteh W; Mahjoub S; Channoufi MB
Minerva Ginecol; 2015 Dec; 67(6):499-505. PubMed ID: 25964145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Preinduction sonographic measurement of cervical length in the prediction of successful induction of labor.
Pandis GK; Papageorghiou AT; Ramanathan VG; Thompson MO; Nicolaides KH
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Dec; 18(6):623-8. PubMed ID: 11844202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of digital and ultrasonographic examination of the cervix in predicting time interval from induction to delivery in women with a low Bishop score.
Rozenberg P; Chevret S; Chastang C; Ville Y
BJOG; 2005 Feb; 112(2):192-6. PubMed ID: 15663583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bishop score and ultrasound assessment of the cervix for prediction of time to onset of labor and time to delivery in prolonged pregnancy.
Strobel E; Sladkevicius P; Rovas L; De Smet F; Karlsson ED; Valentin L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Sep; 28(3):298-305. PubMed ID: 16817173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The validity of ultrasonography in predicting the outcomes of labour induction.
Alvarez-Colomo C; Gobernado-Tejedor JA
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2016 Feb; 293(2):311-6. PubMed ID: 26066659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Predicting success of labor induction in singleton term pregnancies by combining maternal and ultrasound variables.
Prado CA; Araujo Júnior E; Duarte G; Quintana SM; Tonni G; Cavalli Rde C; Marcolin AC
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016 Nov; 29(21):3511-8. PubMed ID: 26742573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Transvaginal ultrasound measurement of cervical length in the supine and upright positions versus Bishop score in predicting successful induction of labor at term.
Meijer-Hoogeveen M; Roos C; Arabin B; Stoutenbeek P; Visser GH
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Feb; 33(2):213-20. PubMed ID: 19173229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of the Manipal Cervical Scoring System for predicting successful induction of labour.
Mohamed El Bishry G; Serag Allam I; Rasheedy R; Mahmoud A
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2019 Nov; 39(8):1057-1064. PubMed ID: 31046494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The value of ultrasound in the prediction of successful induction of labor.
Rane SM; Guirgis RR; Higgins B; Nicolaides KH
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Oct; 24(5):538-49. PubMed ID: 15386612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Can ultrasound measurements replace digitally assessed elements of the Bishop score?
Eggebø TM; Økland I; Heien C; Gjessing LK; Romundstad P; Salvesen KA
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2009; 88(3):325-31. PubMed ID: 19172418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison between subjective and objective assessments of the cervix before induction of labour.
Elghorori MR; Hassan I; Dartey W; Abdel-Aziz E; Bradley M
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2006 Aug; 26(6):521-6. PubMed ID: 17000497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Insulin-like growth factor binding protein 1, Bishop score, and sonographic cervical length: tolerability and prediction of vaginal birth and vaginal birth within 24 hours following labour induction in nulliparous women.
Vallikkannu N; Lam WK; Omar SZ; Tan PC
BJOG; 2017 Jul; 124(8):1274-1283. PubMed ID: 27348806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pre-induction cervical assessment using transvaginal ultrasound versus Bishops cervical scoring as predictors of successful induction of labour in term pregnancies: A hospital-based comparative clinical trial.
Abdullah ZHA; Chew KT; Velayudham VRV; Yahaya Z; Jamil AAM; Abu MA; Ghani NAA; Ismail NAM
PLoS One; 2022; 17(1):e0262387. PubMed ID: 35081157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Are ultrasound measurements of the cervical length and fetal head-perineum distance predictive of delivery outcome in post-term pregnancies?].
Vernet T; Rivaux G; Deruelle P
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2016 Jun; 44(6):329-35. PubMed ID: 27216958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
