85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25727356)
1. Computational psychological study of the Brief Scale for Psychiatric Problems in Orthopaedic Patients (BS-POP) for patients with chronic low back pain: verification of responsiveness.
Yoshida K; Sekiguchi M; Otani K; Mashiko H; Shioda H; Wakita T; Niwa S; Kikuchi S; Konno S
J Orthop Sci; 2015 May; 20(3):469-74. PubMed ID: 25727356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A validation study of the Brief Scale for Psychiatric problems in Orthopaedic Patients (BS-POP) for patients with chronic low back pain (verification of reliability, validity, and reproducibility).
Yoshida K; Sekiguchi M; Otani K; Mashiko H; Shiota H; Wakita T; Niwa Si; Kikuchi S; Konno S
J Orthop Sci; 2011 Jan; 16(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 21267612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Usefulness of the Brief Scale for Psychiatric Problems in Orthopaedic Patients (BS-POP) for Predicting Poor Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Decompression Surgery.
Watanabe K; Otani K; Nikaido T; Kato K; Kobayashi H; Handa J; Yabuki S; Kikuchi SI; Konno SI
Pain Res Manag; 2021; 2021():2589865. PubMed ID: 34970359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Oswestry Disability Index, the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, and the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale: translation and validation studies of the Iranian versions.
Mousavi SJ; Parnianpour M; Mehdian H; Montazeri A; Mobini B
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Jun; 31(14):E454-9. PubMed ID: 16778675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Development, validity, and reliability of The Assessment of Pain and Occupational Performance (POP): a new instrument using two dimensions in the investigation of disability in back pain.
Perneros G; Tropp H
Spine J; 2009 Jun; 9(6):486-98. PubMed ID: 19398217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validation of the Japanese version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire.
Suzukamo Y; Fukuhara S; Kikuchi S; Konno S; Roland M; Iwamoto Y; Nakamura T;
J Orthop Sci; 2003; 8(4):543-8. PubMed ID: 12898308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Chiropractic Hospital-based Interventions Research Outcomes (CHIRO) study: a randomized controlled trial on the effectiveness of clinical practice guidelines in the medical and chiropractic management of patients with acute mechanical low back pain.
Bishop PB; Quon JA; Fisher CG; Dvorak MF
Spine J; 2010 Dec; 10(12):1055-64. PubMed ID: 20889389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Lumbar Spine Outcomes Questionnaire: its development and psychometric properties.
Bendebba M; Dizerega GS; Long DM
Spine J; 2007; 7(1):118-32. PubMed ID: 17197345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and generic health status measures: a population-based study of workers' compensation back injury claimants.
Turner JA; Fulton-Kehoe D; Franklin G; Wickizer TM; Wu R
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 May; 28(10):1061-7; discussion 1067. PubMed ID: 12768149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. 24-item Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire was preferred out of six functional status questionnaires for post-lumbar disc surgery.
Ostelo RW; de Vet HC; Knol DL; van den Brandt PA
J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 Mar; 57(3):268-76. PubMed ID: 15066687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Is a condition-specific instrument for patients with low back pain/leg symptoms really necessary? The responsiveness of the Oswestry Disability Index, MODEMS, and the SF-36.
Walsh TL; Hanscom B; Lurie JD; Weinstein JN
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Mar; 28(6):607-15. PubMed ID: 12642770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. What factors influence the measurement properties of the Roland-Morris disability questionnaire?
Demoulin C; Ostelo R; Knottnerus JA; Smeets RJ
Eur J Pain; 2010 Feb; 14(2):200-6. PubMed ID: 19443246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Chronic pain acceptance questionnaire: confirmatory factor analysis, reliability, and validity in Italian subjects with chronic low back pain.
Monticone M; Ferrante S; Rocca B; Nava T; Parini C; Cerri C
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Jun; 38(13):E824-31. PubMed ID: 23524871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Construct validity and responsiveness of the single-item presenteeism question in patients with lower back pain for the measurement of presenteeism.
Kigozi J; Lewis M; Jowett S; Barton P; Coast J
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Mar; 39(5):409-16. PubMed ID: 24365900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Validity of the new Backache Index (BAI) in patients with low back pain.
Farasyn A; Meeusen R
Spine J; 2006; 6(5):565-71. PubMed ID: 16934729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The efficacy of Back School on chronic low back pain of workers of a pharmaceutical company in a Tehran suburb. COPCORD stage II study.
Sadeghi-Abdollahi B; Eshaghi A; Hosseini SN; Ghahremani M; Davatchi F
Int J Rheum Dis; 2012 Apr; 15(2):144-53. PubMed ID: 22462417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Oswestry Disability Index (version 2.1a): validation of a Dutch language version.
van Hooff ML; Spruit M; Fairbank JC; van Limbeek J; Jacobs WC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Jan; 40(2):E83-90. PubMed ID: 25575092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the short form 12-item survey (SF-12) in patients with back pain.
Luo X; George ML; Kakouras I; Edwards CL; Pietrobon R; Richardson W; Hey L
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Aug; 28(15):1739-45. PubMed ID: 12897502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The functional rating index: reliability and validity of the Persian language version in patients with low back pain.
Ansari NN; Feise RJ; Naghdi S; Ebadi S; Yoosefinejad AK
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Nov; 36(24):E1573-7. PubMed ID: 21270679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The access randomized clinical trial of public versus private physiotherapy for low back pain.
Casserley-Feeney SN; Daly L; Hurley DA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Jan; 37(2):85-96. PubMed ID: 21289590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
