These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25727521)

  • 1. A meta-analysis of criterion effects for the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP) in the clinical domain.
    Vahey NA; Nicholson E; Barnes-Holmes D
    J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry; 2015 Sep; 48():59-65. PubMed ID: 25727521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Measuring implicit attitudes: A positive framing bias flaw in the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP).
    O'Shea B; Watson DG; Brown GD
    Psychol Assess; 2016 Feb; 28(2):158-70. PubMed ID: 26075407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Testing the discrepancy between actual and ideal body image with the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP).
    Hernández-López M; Quiñones-Jiménez L; Blanco-Romero AL; Rodríguez-Valverde M
    J Eat Disord; 2021 Jul; 9(1):82. PubMed ID: 34238379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Measurement of the Vertical Spatial Metaphor of Power Concepts Using the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure.
    Hong B; Zhang L; Sun H
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():1422. PubMed ID: 31316420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A meta-epidemiological study to examine the association between bias and treatment effects in neonatal trials.
    Bialy L; Vandermeer B; Lacaze-Masmonteil T; Dryden DM; Hartling L
    Evid Based Child Health; 2014 Dec; 9(4):1052-9. PubMed ID: 25504975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Anti-fat, pro-slim, or both? Using two reaction-time based measures to assess implicit attitudes to the slim and overweight.
    Roddy S; Stewart I; Barnes-Holmes D
    J Health Psychol; 2010 Apr; 15(3):416-25. PubMed ID: 20348362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Training and testing for a transformation of fear and avoidance functions using the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure: The first study.
    Leech A; Bouyrden J; Bruijsten N; Barnes-Holmes D; McEnteggart C
    Behav Processes; 2018 Dec; 157():24-35. PubMed ID: 30172801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The IRAP as a Measure of Implicit Cognition: A Case of Frankenstein's Monster.
    Barnes-Holmes D; Harte C
    Perspect Behav Sci; 2022 Sep; 45(3):559-578. PubMed ID: 36249169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Detecting and adjusting for small-study effects in meta-analysis.
    Rücker G; Carpenter JR; Schwarzer G
    Biom J; 2011 Mar; 53(2):351-68. PubMed ID: 21374698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Analysis and meta-analysis of single-case designs with a standardized mean difference statistic: a primer and applications.
    Shadish WR; Hedges LV; Pustejovsky JE
    J Sch Psychol; 2014 Apr; 52(2):123-47. PubMed ID: 24606972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Implicit attitudes towards dementia after education: Preliminary trial results from Japan.
    Matsumoto H; Suzuki H; Kugai H; Takaoka M; Sakka M; Ito K; Yamamoto-Mitani N; Igarashi A
    Australas J Ageing; 2024 Feb; ():. PubMed ID: 38357750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessing Psychological Inflexibility Pertaining to Self in Patients With Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Using an Indirect Measure of (Nonassociative) Propositions.
    Janssen PGJ; McEnteggart C; Barnes-Holmes D; van Ee E; Egger J
    Behav Ther; 2022 Nov; 53(6):1122-1132. PubMed ID: 36229111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Meta-analysis of clinical trials with early stopping: an investigation of potential bias.
    Schou IM; Marschner IC
    Stat Med; 2013 Dec; 32(28):4859-74. PubMed ID: 23824994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Interpretation of tests of heterogeneity and bias in meta-analysis.
    Ioannidis JP
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2008 Oct; 14(5):951-7. PubMed ID: 19018930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Development and validation of an explicit aggressive beliefs and attitudes scale.
    Michel JS; Pace VL; Edun A; Sawhney E; Thomas J
    J Pers Assess; 2014; 96(3):327-38. PubMed ID: 24033293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of methods to detect publication bias in meta-analysis.
    Macaskill P; Walter SD; Irwig L
    Stat Med; 2001 Feb; 20(4):641-54. PubMed ID: 11223905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Using the Teacher IRAP (T-IRAP) interactive computerized programme to teach complex flexible relational responding with children with diagnosed autism spectrum disorder.
    Murphy C; Lyons K; Kelly M; Barnes-Holmes Y; Barnes-Holmes D
    Behav Anal Pract; 2019 Mar; 12(1):52-65. PubMed ID: 30918770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Training and testing for a transformation of fear and avoidance functions via combinatorial entailment using the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP): Further exploratory analyses.
    Leech A; Barnes-Holmes D
    Behav Processes; 2020 Mar; 172():104027. PubMed ID: 31887342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. On percentile norms in neuropsychology: proposed reporting standards and methods for quantifying the uncertainty over the percentile ranks of test scores.
    Crawford JR; Garthwaite PH; Slick DJ
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2009 Sep; 23(7):1173-95. PubMed ID: 19322734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Size of treatment effects and their importance to clinical research and practice.
    Kraemer HC; Kupfer DJ
    Biol Psychiatry; 2006 Jun; 59(11):990-6. PubMed ID: 16368078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.