These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25728115)

  • 1. Golden proportions as predictors of attractiveness and malocclusion.
    Rajiv A; Juhi Y
    Indian J Dent Res; 2014; 25(6):788-93. PubMed ID: 25728115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Facial aesthetics and the divine proportion: a comparison of surgical and non-surgical class II treatment.
    Shell TL; Woods MG
    Aust Orthod J; 2004 Nov; 20(2):51-63. PubMed ID: 16429875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Putative golden proportions as predictors of facial esthetics in adolescents.
    Kiekens RM; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM; van 't Hof MA; van 't Hof BE; Maltha JC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Oct; 134(4):480-3. PubMed ID: 18929264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perception of facial profile attractiveness of different antero-posterior and vertical proportions.
    Abu Arqoub SH; Al-Khateeb SN
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Feb; 33(1):103-11. PubMed ID: 20558590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Do the Most Attractive Faces of Patients With Class II Division 1 Malocclusion Differ From Those With the Least Attractive Faces in Terms of Angular and Proportional Measurements Assessed on Frontal and Lateral Photographs?
    Mortada AA; Burhan AS; Hajeer MY; Nawaya FR; Sahtout GF
    Cureus; 2023 Jan; 15(1):e33455. PubMed ID: 36628400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative evaluation of facial attractiveness by laypersons in terms of facial proportions and equate it's deviation from divine proportions - A photographic study.
    Shah R; Nair R
    J Oral Biol Craniofac Res; 2022; 12(5):492-499. PubMed ID: 35755137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of malocclusions on facial attractiveness and their correlations with the divine proportion.
    Akan S; Torgut AG; Oktay H
    J Orofac Orthop; 2017 Sep; 78(5):427-436. PubMed ID: 28451737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Golden Proportion Analysis of Dental-Skeletal Patterns of Class II and III Patients Pre and Post Orthodontic-orthognathic Treatment.
    Bragatto FP; Chicarelli M; Kasuya AV; Takeshita WM; Iwaki-Filho L; Iwaki LC
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Sep; 17(9):728-733. PubMed ID: 27733715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The role of the divine proportion in the esthetic improvement of patients undergoing combined orthodontic/orthognathic surgical treatment.
    Baker BW; Woods MG
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 2001; 16(2):108-20. PubMed ID: 11482289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The perception of facial aesthetics in a young Spanish population.
    Macías Gago AB; Romero Maroto M; Crego A
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Jun; 34(3):335-9. PubMed ID: 21447783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of facial attractiveness from end-of-treatment facial photographs.
    Shafiee R; Korn EL; Pearson H; Boyd RL; Baumrind S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Apr; 133(4):500-8. PubMed ID: 18405813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of the influence of dental and facial aesthetics in determining overall attractiveness.
    Prasad KN; Sabrish S; Mathew S; Shivamurthy PG; Pattabiraman V; Sagarkar R
    Int Orthod; 2018 Dec; 16(4):684-697. PubMed ID: 30385289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The role of the posed smile in overall facial esthetics.
    Havens DC; McNamara JA; Sigler LM; Baccetti T
    Angle Orthod; 2010 Mar; 80(2):322-8. PubMed ID: 19905858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The golden proportion in facial soft-tissues of Vietnamese females.
    Nguyen MS; Saag M; Le VN; Nguyen TT; Nguyen BB; Jagomägi T
    Stomatologija; 2016; 18(3):80-85. PubMed ID: 28386050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Facial soft tissue changes after orthodontic treatment.
    Aksakalli S; Demir A
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2014; 17(3):282-6. PubMed ID: 24714003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Divine proportions in attractive and nonattractive faces.
    Pancherz H; Knapp V; Erbe C; Heiss AM
    World J Orthod; 2010; 11(1):27-36. PubMed ID: 20209174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [The effect of orthodontic treatment on facial profile of patients with Class II division 1 malocclusions].
    Yi S; Lin XP; Hu RD; Ni ZY
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2012 Feb; 21(1):88-93. PubMed ID: 22431053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The role of the golden proportion in the evaluation of facial esthetics.
    Rossetti A; De Menezes M; Rosati R; Ferrario VF; Sforza C
    Angle Orthod; 2013 Sep; 83(5):801-8. PubMed ID: 23477386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of facial divine proportion in North Indian Population.
    Khan NA; Nagar A; Tandon P; Singh GK; Singh A
    Contemp Clin Dent; 2016; 7(3):366-70. PubMed ID: 27630502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of facial attractiveness for patients with malocclusion: a machine-learning technique employing Procrustes.
    Yu X; Liu B; Pei Y; Xu T
    Angle Orthod; 2014 May; 84(3):410-6. PubMed ID: 24090123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.