These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25728115)

  • 21. Contribution of malocclusion and female facial attractiveness to smile esthetics evaluated by eye tracking.
    Richards MR; Fields HW; Beck FM; Firestone AR; Walther DB; Rosenstiel S; Sacksteder JM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Apr; 147(4):472-82. PubMed ID: 25836007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Panel perception of facial attractiveness.
    Kerr WJ; O'Donnell JM
    Br J Orthod; 1990 Nov; 17(4):299-304. PubMed ID: 2285698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Facial esthetics in adolescents and its relationship to "ideal" ratios and angles.
    Kiekens RM; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM; van 't Hof MA; van 't Hof BE; Straatman H; Maltha JC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Feb; 133(2):188.e1-8. PubMed ID: 18249280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Cumulative frequency distribution in East Asian facial widths using the facial golden mask.
    Lee JH; Kim TG; Park GW; Kim YH
    J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Sep; 20(5):1378-82. PubMed ID: 19816261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Assessment of facial golden proportions among young Japanese women.
    Mizumoto Y; Deguchi T; Fong KW
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Aug; 136(2):168-74. PubMed ID: 19651345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Smile esthetics: perception and comparison of treated and untreated smiles.
    Işiksal E; Hazar S; Akyalçin S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Jan; 129(1):8-16. PubMed ID: 16443472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Correlation Between Cephalometric Measures and End-of-Treatment Facial Attractiveness.
    Yu XN; Bai D; Feng X; Liu YH; Chen WJ; Li S; Han GL; Jiang RP; Xu TM
    J Craniofac Surg; 2016 Mar; 27(2):405-9. PubMed ID: 26872281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Phenotype-genotype correlations of facial width and height proportions in patients with Class II malocclusion.
    Moreno Uribe LM; Ray A; Blanchette DR; Dawson DV; Southard TE
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2015 Apr; 18 Suppl 1(0 1):100-8. PubMed ID: 25865538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [The anthropomorphic proportions of the face: an evaluation of the response to orthodontic surgical treatment of Angle class III].
    Savastano C; Craca R
    Minerva Stomatol; 1992 Sep; 41(9):373-83. PubMed ID: 1491654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A comparison of providers' and consumers' perceptions of facial-profile attractiveness.
    Maple JR; Vig KW; Beck FM; Larsen PE; Shanker S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Dec; 128(6):690-6; quiz 801. PubMed ID: 16360907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Ranking facial attractiveness.
    Knight H; Keith O
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Aug; 27(4):340-8. PubMed ID: 16043472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Angles of facial convexity in different skeletal Classes.
    Godt A; Müller A; Kalwitzki M; Göz G
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Dec; 29(6):648-53. PubMed ID: 17878186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. An Asian community's perspective on facial profile attractiveness.
    Soh J; Chew MT; Wong HB
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2007 Feb; 35(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 17244134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Divine proportions and facial esthetics after manipulation of frontal photographs.
    Medici Filho E; Martins MV; dos Santos da Silva MA; Castilho JC; de Moraes LC; Gil CT
    World J Orthod; 2007; 8(2):103-8. PubMed ID: 17580503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Association between ratings of facial attractivess and patients' motivation for orthognathic surgery.
    Vargo JK; Gladwin M; Ngan P
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2003 Feb; 6(1):63-71. PubMed ID: 12627797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Role of facial attractiveness in patients with slight-to-borderline treatment need according to the Aesthetic Component of the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need as judged by eye tracking.
    Johnson EK; Fields HW; Beck FM; Firestone AR; Rosenstiel SF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Feb; 151(2):297-310. PubMed ID: 28153159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Perception of facial attractiveness by patients, peers, and professionals.
    Phillips C; Griffin T; Bennett E
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1995; 10(2):127-35. PubMed ID: 9081998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Assessment of orthodontic treatment need: a comparison of study models and facial photographs.
    Sherlock JM; Cobourne MT; McDonald F
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2008 Feb; 36(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 18205636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Impact of functional orthodontic treatment on facial attractiveness of children with Class II division 1 malocclusion.
    Paduano S; Rongo R; Bucci R; Carvelli G; Cioffi I
    Eur J Orthod; 2020 Apr; 42(2):144-150. PubMed ID: 31586412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Perceptions of facial aesthetics in two and three dimensions.
    Todd SA; Hammond P; Hutton T; Cochrane S; Cunningham S
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Aug; 27(4):363-9. PubMed ID: 15961568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.