These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

81 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25728181)

  • 1. Averaging auditory evoked magnetoencephalographic and electroencephalographic responses: a critical discussion.
    König R; Matysiak A; Kordecki W; Sielużycki C; Zacharias N; Heil P
    Eur J Neurosci; 2015 Mar; 41(5):631-40. PubMed ID: 25728181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Variance stabilization for computing and comparing grand mean waveforms in MEG and EEG.
    Matysiak A; Kordecki W; Sielużycki C; Zacharias N; Heil P; König R
    Psychophysiology; 2013 Jul; 50(7):627-39. PubMed ID: 23577776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The M100 component of evoked magnetic fields differs by scaling factors: implications for signal averaging.
    Zacharias N; Sielużycki C; Kordecki W; König R; Heil P
    Psychophysiology; 2011 Aug; 48(8):1069-82. PubMed ID: 21342204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Single-trial evoked brain responses modeled by multivariate matching pursuit.
    Sieluzycki C; König R; Matysiak A; Kuś R; Ircha D; Durka PJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2009 Jan; 56(1):74-82. PubMed ID: 19224721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Magnetoencephalography of the newborn brain.
    Huotilainen M
    Semin Fetal Neonatal Med; 2006 Dec; 11(6):437-43. PubMed ID: 16979394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Multiplicative correction of subject effect as preprocessing for analysis of variance.
    Nemoto I; Abe M; Kotani M
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Mar; 55(3):941-8. PubMed ID: 18334385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quantifying additive evoked contributions to the event-related potential.
    Turi G; Gotthardt S; Singer W; Vuong TA; Munk M; Wibral M
    Neuroimage; 2012 Feb; 59(3):2607-24. PubMed ID: 21982933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A New Recognition Method for the Auditory Evoked Magnetic Fields.
    Feng Y; Xiao W; Wu T; Zhang J; Xiang J; Guo H
    Comput Intell Neurosci; 2021; 2021():6645270. PubMed ID: 33628215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Independent component approach to the analysis of EEG and MEG recordings.
    Vigário R; Särelä J; Jousmäki V; Hämäläinen M; Oja E
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2000 May; 47(5):589-93. PubMed ID: 10851802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Localization of human supratemporal auditory areas from intracerebral auditory evoked potentials using distributed source models.
    Yvert B; Fischer C; Bertrand O; Pernier J
    Neuroimage; 2005 Oct; 28(1):140-53. PubMed ID: 16039144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Auditory evoked responses are additive to brain oscillations.
    Mäkinen VT; Tiitinen H; May PJ
    Neurol Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Nov; 2004():45. PubMed ID: 16015712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Phase-compensated averaging for analyzing electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography epochs.
    Matani A; Naruse Y; Terazono Y; Iwasaki T; Fujimaki N; Murata T
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2010 May; 57(5):1117-23. PubMed ID: 20172813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Phase-interpolated averaging for analyzing electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography epochs.
    Matani A; Naruse Y; Terazono Y; Fujimaki N; Murata T
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2011 Jan; 58(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 20889427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Systematic latency variation of the auditory evoked M100: from average to single-trial data.
    Salajegheh A; Link A; Elster C; Burghoff M; Sander T; Trahms L; Poeppel D
    Neuroimage; 2004 Sep; 23(1):288-95. PubMed ID: 15325376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Nonparametric statistical testing of EEG- and MEG-data.
    Maris E; Oostenveld R
    J Neurosci Methods; 2007 Aug; 164(1):177-90. PubMed ID: 17517438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sorted averaging--application to auditory event-related responses.
    Rahne T; von Specht H; Mühler R
    J Neurosci Methods; 2008 Jul; 172(1):74-8. PubMed ID: 18499265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dynamic causal modeling of evoked responses in EEG and MEG.
    David O; Kiebel SJ; Harrison LM; Mattout J; Kilner JM; Friston KJ
    Neuroimage; 2006 May; 30(4):1255-72. PubMed ID: 16473023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Modeling sparse connectivity between underlying brain sources for EEG/MEG.
    Haufe S; Tomioka R; Nolte G; Müller KR; Kawanabe M
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2010 Aug; 57(8):1954-63. PubMed ID: 20483681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Spatiotemporal forward solution of the EEG and MEG using network modeling.
    Jirsa VK; Jantzen KJ; Fuchs A; Kelso JA
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2002 May; 21(5):493-504. PubMed ID: 12071620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sorted averaging improves quality of auditory steady-state responses.
    Rahne T; Verhey JL; Mühler R
    J Neurosci Methods; 2013 May; 216(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 23603663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.