These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

77 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25728947)

  • 1. Causal judgements about temporal sequences of events in single individuals.
    White PA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(11):2149-74. PubMed ID: 25728947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Causal judgement from information about outcome magnitude.
    White PA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(11):2268-88. PubMed ID: 23573791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Temporal predictability enhances judgements of causality in elemental causal induction from both observation and intervention.
    Greville WJ; Buehner MJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(4):678-97. PubMed ID: 25996899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Contiguity and the outcome density bias in action-outcome contingency judgements.
    Vallée-Tourangeau F; Murphy RA; Baker AG
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 2005 Apr; 58(2):177-92. PubMed ID: 16095045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Causal judgments about empirical information in an interrupted time series design.
    White PA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Jan; 70(1):18-35. PubMed ID: 26624272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Judgement of two causal candidates from contingency information: II. Effects of information about one cause on judgements of the other cause.
    White PA
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2005 Aug; 58(6):999-1021. PubMed ID: 16194945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perceiving a strong causal relation in a weak contingency: further investigation of the evidential evaluation model of causal judgement.
    White PA
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2002 Jan; 55(1):97-114. PubMed ID: 11873858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cue interaction effects in causal judgement: an interpretation in terms of the evidential evaluation model.
    White PA
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 2005 Apr; 58(2):99-140. PubMed ID: 16095042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Weighting of contingency information in causal judgement: evidence of hypothesis dependence and use of a positive-test strategy.
    Mandel DR; Vartanian O
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Dec; 62(12):2388-408. PubMed ID: 19391044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Causal judgment as evaluation of evidence: the use of confirmation and disconfirmatory information.
    White PA
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Apr; 56(3):491-513. PubMed ID: 12814099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Causal judgement from contingency information: judging interactions between two causal candidates.
    White PA
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2002 Jul; 55(3):819-38. PubMed ID: 12188515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Rethinking temporal contiguity and the judgement of causality: effects of prior knowledge, experience, and reinforcement procedure.
    Buehner MJ; May J
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Jul; 56(5):865-90. PubMed ID: 12850993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Who deserves to be sick? An exploration of the relationships between belief in a just world, illness causal attributions and their fairness judgements.
    Nudelman G; Shiloh S
    Psychol Health Med; 2011 Dec; 16(6):675-85. PubMed ID: 21678199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The impact of the congestion charging scheme on air quality in London. Part 1. Emissions modeling and analysis of air pollution measurements.
    Kelly F; Anderson HR; Armstrong B; Atkinson R; Barratt B; Beevers S; Derwent D; Green D; Mudway I; Wilkinson P;
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2011 Apr; (155):5-71. PubMed ID: 21830496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accounting for occurrences: a new view of the use of contingency information in causal judgment.
    White PA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Jan; 34(1):204-18. PubMed ID: 18194063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of stimulus order on discrimination processes in comparative and equality judgements: data and models.
    Dyjas O; Ulrich R
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(6):1121-50. PubMed ID: 24295428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Valuing intervention and observation.
    Green DW; Over DE
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 May; 62(5):1010-22. PubMed ID: 18726821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Normative and descriptive accounts of the influence of power and contingency on causal judgement.
    Perales JC; Shanks DR
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Aug; 56(6):977-1007. PubMed ID: 12881167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. What would have happened? Counterfactuals, hypotheticals and causal judgements.
    Gerstenberg T
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2022 Dec; 377(1866):20210339. PubMed ID: 36314143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Outcome additivity, elemental processing and blocking in human causality judgements.
    Livesey EJ; Boakes RA
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 2004 Oct; 57(4):361-79. PubMed ID: 15513261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.