These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25730075)

  • 41. Molecular markers and their use in animal breeding.
    Beuzen ND; Stear MJ; Chang KC
    Vet J; 2000 Jul; 160(1):42-52. PubMed ID: 10950134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Parentage verification in field progeny testing program of Mehsana buffalo.
    Jakhesara SJ; Rank DN; Kansara JD; Parikh RC; Patel VM; Vataliya PH; Solanki JV
    J Anim Sci; 2012 Dec; 90(13):4723-8. PubMed ID: 22851245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Paternity testing using microsatellite DNA markers in captive Adélie penguins (Pygoscelis adeliae).
    Sakaoka K; Suzuki I; Kasugai N; Fukumoto Y
    Zoo Biol; 2014; 33(5):463-70. PubMed ID: 25157452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Efficient parentage assignment and pedigree reconstruction with dense single nucleotide polymorphism data.
    Hayes BJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Apr; 94(4):2114-7. PubMed ID: 21427003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Selection and effectiveness of informative SNPs for paternity in Chinese Simmental cattle based on a high-density SNP array.
    Zhang T; Guo L; Shi M; Xu L; Chen Y; Zhang L; Gao H; Li J; Gao X
    Gene; 2018 Oct; 673():211-216. PubMed ID: 29933017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Evaluation of FABP2 as candidate gene for a fatty acid composition QTL in porcine chromosome 8.
    Estellé J; Mercadé A; Pérez-Enciso M; Pena RN; Silió L; Sánchez A; Folch JM
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2009 Feb; 126(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 19207930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Identifying parentage using molecular markers: improving accuracy of studbook records for a captive flock of marabou storks (Leptoptilos crumeniferus).
    Ferrie GM; Cohen OR; Schutz P; Leighty KA; Plasse C; Bettinger TL; Hoffman EA
    Zoo Biol; 2013; 32(5):556-64. PubMed ID: 23959926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Evaluation of genetic introgression from domesticated pigs into the Ryukyu wild boar population on Iriomote Island in Japan.
    Murakami K; Yoshikawa S; Konishi S; Ueno Y; Watanabe S; Mizoguchi Y
    Anim Genet; 2014 Aug; 45(4):517-23. PubMed ID: 24754898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Development and use of molecular markers: past and present.
    Grover A; Sharma PC
    Crit Rev Biotechnol; 2016; 36(2):290-302. PubMed ID: 25430893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Analysis of the non-recombining Y chromosome defines polymorphisms in domestic pig breeds: ancestral bases identified by comparative sequencing.
    Cliffe KM; Day AE; Bagga M; Siggens K; Quilter CR; Lowden S; Finlayson HA; Palgrave CJ; Li N; Huang L; Blott SC; Sargent CA
    Anim Genet; 2010 Dec; 41(6):619-29. PubMed ID: 20477804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The reliability of haplotyping inference in nuclear families: misassignment rates for SNPs and microsatellites.
    Lindholm E; Zhang J; Hodge SE; Greenberg DA
    Hum Hered; 2004; 57(3):117-27. PubMed ID: 15297805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The insulin-like growth factor 2 (IGF2) gene intron3-g.3072G>A polymorphism is not the only Sus scrofa chromosome 2p mutation affecting meat production and carcass traits in pigs: evidence from the effects of a cathepsin D (CTSD) gene polymorphism.
    Fontanesi L; Speroni C; Buttazzoni L; Scotti E; Dall'Olio S; Nanni Costa L; Davoli R; Russo V
    J Anim Sci; 2010 Jul; 88(7):2235-45. PubMed ID: 20382874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. On marker-based parentage verification via non-linear optimization.
    Boerner V
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Jun; 49(1):50. PubMed ID: 28619083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Estimation of the number of genetic markers required for individual animal identification accounting for genotyping errors.
    Weller JI; Seroussi E; Ron M
    Anim Genet; 2006 Aug; 37(4):387-9. PubMed ID: 16879353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Associations between single nucleotide polymorphisms in 33 candidate genes and meat quality traits in commercial pigs.
    Zhang CY; Wang Z; Bruce HL; Janz J; Goddard E; Moore S; Plastow GS
    Anim Genet; 2014 Aug; 45(4):508-16. PubMed ID: 24707962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Effects of genotyping errors on parentage exclusion analysis.
    Wang J
    Mol Ecol; 2010 Nov; 19(22):5061-78. PubMed ID: 20964757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Exclusion and Genomic Relatedness Methods for Assignment of Parentage Using Genotyping-by-Sequencing Data.
    Dodds KG; McEwan JC; Brauning R; van Stijn TC; Rowe SJ; McEwan KM; Clarke SM
    G3 (Bethesda); 2019 Oct; 9(10):3239-3247. PubMed ID: 31383721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Utility of canine microsatellites in revealing the relationships of pure bred dogs.
    Zajc I; Sampson J
    J Hered; 1999; 90(1):104-7. PubMed ID: 9987914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Development of novel SNP system for individual and pedigree control in a Japanese Black cattle population using whole-genome genotyping assay.
    Hara K; Kon Y; Sasazaki S; Mukai F; Mannen H
    Anim Sci J; 2010 Aug; 81(4):506-12. PubMed ID: 20662822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. [The application of microsatellite markers for parentage determination in selective breeding of Pacific white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei)].
    Wang HX; Wu CG; Zhang LS; Xiang JH
    Yi Chuan; 2006 Feb; 28(2):179-83. PubMed ID: 16520313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.