BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

309 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25730102)

  • 1. When remembering the past suppresses memory for future actions.
    Utsumi K; Saito S
    Memory; 2016; 24(4):437-43. PubMed ID: 25730102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Wait a second: Brief delays in responding reduce focality effects in event-based prospective memory.
    Loft S; Remington RW
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(7):1432-47. PubMed ID: 23281819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Remembering the past and imagining the future: examining the consequences of mental time travel on memory.
    Storm BC; Jobe TA
    Memory; 2012; 20(3):224-35. PubMed ID: 22360761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Remembering the past and imagining the future: Selective effects of an episodic specificity induction on detail generation.
    Madore KP; Schacter DL
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(2):285-98. PubMed ID: 25529786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Retrieval-induced forgetting: evidence for a recall-specific mechanism.
    Anderson MC; Bjork EL; Bjork RA
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2000 Sep; 7(3):522-30. PubMed ID: 11082860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Low involvement of preexisting associations makes retrieval-induced forgetting long lasting.
    Ortega A; Gómez-Ariza CJ; Morales J; Bajo MT
    Cogn Process; 2015 May; 16(2):121-30. PubMed ID: 25838256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Retrieval-induced forgetting in recall: competitor interference revisited.
    Verde MF
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Sep; 39(5):1433-48. PubMed ID: 23687918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Control of cost in prospective memory: evidence for spontaneous retrieval processes.
    Scullin MK; McDaniel MA; Einstein GO
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jan; 36(1):190-203. PubMed ID: 20053054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prior task experience and comparable stimulus exposure nullify focal and nonfocal prospective memory retrieval differences.
    Hicks JL; Franks BA; Spitler SN
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Oct; 70(10):1997-2006. PubMed ID: 27461749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Contextual match and cue-independence of retrieval-induced forgetting: Testing the prediction of the model by Norman, Newman, and Detre (2007).
    Hanczakowski M; Mazzoni G
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 May; 39(3):953-8. PubMed ID: 23088549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Competitive retrieval is not a prerequisite for forgetting in the retrieval practice paradigm.
    Camp G; Dalm S
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2016 Sep; 70(3):248-252. PubMed ID: 26569141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prospective memory and aging: evidence for preserved spontaneous retrieval with exact but not related cues.
    Mullet HG; Scullin MK; Hess TJ; Scullin RB; Arnold KM; Einstein GO
    Psychol Aging; 2013 Dec; 28(4):910-22. PubMed ID: 24364398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of semantic context on prospective memory performance.
    Thomas BJ; McBride DM
    Memory; 2016; 24(3):315-23. PubMed ID: 25647351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Remembering episodic memories is not necessary for forgetting of negative words: Semantic retrieval can cause forgetting of negative words.
    Kobayashi M; Tanno Y
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Jun; 22(3):766-71. PubMed ID: 25199466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Retrieval of past and future positive and negative autobiographical experiences.
    García-Bajos E; Migueles M
    Cogn Emot; 2017 Sep; 31(6):1260-1267. PubMed ID: 27367578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Differential retrieval of past and future autobiographical experiences.
    Migueles M; García-Bajos E
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2015 Sep; 69(3):274-82. PubMed ID: 25774993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. No retrieval-induced forgetting using item-specific independent cues: evidence against a general inhibitory account.
    Camp G; Pecher D; Schmidt HG
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Sep; 33(5):950-8. PubMed ID: 17723071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The development of prospective memory in preschool children using naturalistic tasks.
    Walsh SJ; Martin GM; Courage ML
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2014 Nov; 127():8-23. PubMed ID: 24290293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Retrieval-induced forgetting: testing the competition assumption of inhibition theory.
    Jonker TR; MacLeod CM
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2012 Sep; 66(3):204-11. PubMed ID: 22506876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Individual differences in episodic memory abilities predict successful prospective memory output monitoring.
    Hunter Ball B; Pitães M; Brewer GA
    Memory; 2018 Sep; 26(8):1159-1168. PubMed ID: 29415613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.