278 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25730134)
1. Ultrasonographic Fetal Weight Estimation: Should Macrosomia-Specific Formulas Be Utilized?
Porter B; Neely C; Szychowski J; Owen J
Am J Perinatol; 2015 Aug; 32(10):968-72. PubMed ID: 25730134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Weight estimation for low birth weight fetuses and macrosomic fetuses in Chinese population.
Chen P; Yu J; Li X; Wang Y; Chang C
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2011 Sep; 284(3):599-606. PubMed ID: 21046133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Ultrasound macrosomic fetal weight estimation formula using maternal weight measurements].
Murlewska J; Pietryga M; Wender-Ozegowska E
Ginekol Pol; 2011 Feb; 82(2):114-8. PubMed ID: 21574483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sonographic EFW and macrosomia: is there an optimum formula to predict diabetic fetal macrosomia?
Combs CA; Rosenn B; Miodovnik M; Siddiqi TA
J Matern Fetal Med; 2000; 9(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 10757437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Macrosomia: a new formula for optimized fetal weight estimation.
Hart NC; Hilbert A; Meurer B; Schrauder M; Schmid M; Siemer J; Voigt M; Schild RL
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Jan; 35(1):42-7. PubMed ID: 20034003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ultrasonographic weight estimation in large for gestational age fetuses: a comparison of 17 sonographic formulas and four models algorithms.
Rosati P; Arduini M; Giri C; Guariglia L
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2010 Jul; 23(7):675-80. PubMed ID: 19895358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sonographic prediction of macrosomia in pregnancies complicated by maternal diabetes: finding the best formula.
Shmueli A; Salman L; Hadar E; Aviram A; Bardin R; Ashwal E; Gabbay-Benziv R
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2019 Jan; 299(1):97-103. PubMed ID: 30327863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Different formulas, different thresholds and different performance-the prediction of macrosomia by ultrasound.
Aviram A; Yogev Y; Ashwal E; Hiersch L; Danon D; Hadar E; Gabbay-Benziv R
J Perinatol; 2017 Dec; 37(12):1285-1291. PubMed ID: 28906497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Optimized Sonographic Weight Estimation of Fetuses over 3500 g Using Biometry-Guided Formula Selection.
Balsyte D; Schäffer L; Zimmermann R; Kurmanavicius J; Burkhardt T
Ultraschall Med; 2017 Jan; 38(1):60-64. PubMed ID: 26422668
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Three-Versus Two-Dimensional Sonographic Biometry for Predicting Birth Weight and Macrosomia in Diabetic Pregnancies.
Tuuli MG; Kapalka K; Macones GA; Cahill AG
J Ultrasound Med; 2016 Sep; 35(9):1925-30. PubMed ID: 27466257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ultrasound diagnosis of fetal macrosomia: a comparison of weight prediction models using computer simulation.
Mongelli M; Benzie R
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Oct; 26(5):500-3. PubMed ID: 16180258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Finding the best formula to predict the fetal weight: comparison of 18 formulas.
Esinler D; Bircan O; Esin S; Sahin EG; Kandemir O; Yalvac S
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2015; 80(2):78-84. PubMed ID: 26183256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fetal weight estimation in gestational diabetic pregnancies: comparison between conventional and three-dimensional fractional thigh volume methods using gestation-adjusted projection.
Pagani G; Palai N; Zatti S; Fratelli N; Prefumo F; Frusca T
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Jan; 43(1):72-6. PubMed ID: 23494762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Incorporating sonographic cheek-to-cheek diameter, biparietal diameter and abdominal circumference improves weight estimation in the macrosomic fetus.
Abramowicz JS; Robischon K; Cox C
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Jun; 9(6):409-13. PubMed ID: 9239827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Estimators of birth weight in pregnant women requiring insulin: a comparison of seven sonographic models.
McLaren RA; Puckett JL; Chauhan SP
Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Apr; 85(4):565-9. PubMed ID: 7898834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diagnostic accuracy of modified Hadlock formula for fetal macrosomia in women with gestational diabetes and pregnancy weight gain above recommended.
Lovrić B; Šijanović S; Lešin J; Juras J
J Perinat Med; 2021 Sep; 49(7):907-914. PubMed ID: 33861027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fetal weight estimation in extreme macrosomia (≥ 4,500 g): comparison of 10 formulas.
Faschingbauer F; Voigt F; Goecke TW; Siemer J; Beckmann MW; Yazdi B; Schild RL
Ultraschall Med; 2012 Dec; 33(7):E62-E67. PubMed ID: 22179801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Disadvantages of a weight estimation formula for macrosomic fetuses: the Hart formula from a clinical perspective.
Weiss C; Oppelt P; Mayer RB
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2018 Dec; 298(6):1101-1106. PubMed ID: 30284620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prediction of fetal macrosomia using two-dimensional and three-dimensional ultrasound.
Mazzone E; Dall'Asta A; Kiener AJO; Carpano MG; Suprani A; Ghi T; Frusca T
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 Dec; 243():26-31. PubMed ID: 31670065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of sonographic estimation of fetal weight before induction of labor in diabetic pregnancies and pregnancies with suspected fetal macrosomia.
Ben-Haroush A; Yogev Y; Mashiach R; Hod M; Meisner I
J Perinat Med; 2003; 31(3):225-30. PubMed ID: 12825478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
