These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

326 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25730633)

  • 1. Statistical Electronic Structure Calibration Study of the CCSD(T*)-F12b Method for Atomization Energies.
    Feller D
    J Phys Chem A; 2015 Jul; 119(28):7375-87. PubMed ID: 25730633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An expanded calibration study of the explicitly correlated CCSD(T)-F12b method using large basis set standard CCSD(T) atomization energies.
    Feller D; Peterson KA
    J Chem Phys; 2013 Aug; 139(8):084110. PubMed ID: 24006977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Extrapolating MP2 and CCSD explicitly correlated correlation energies to the complete basis set limit with first and second row correlation consistent basis sets.
    Hill JG; Peterson KA; Knizia G; Werner HJ
    J Chem Phys; 2009 Nov; 131(19):194105. PubMed ID: 19929044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Simple coupled-cluster singles and doubles method with perturbative inclusion of triples and explicitly correlated geminals: The CCSD(T)R12 model.
    Valeev EF; Daniel Crawford T
    J Chem Phys; 2008 Jun; 128(24):244113. PubMed ID: 18601323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Benchmarks of improved complete basis set extrapolation schemes designed for standard CCSD(T) atomization energies.
    Feller D
    J Chem Phys; 2013 Feb; 138(7):074103. PubMed ID: 23444993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Explicit correlation and basis set superposition error: the structure and energy of carbon dioxide dimer.
    McMahon JD; Lane JR
    J Chem Phys; 2011 Oct; 135(15):154309. PubMed ID: 22029315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Toward a W4-F12 approach: Can explicitly correlated and orbital-based ab initio CCSD(T) limits be reconciled?
    Sylvetsky N; Peterson KA; Karton A; Martin JM
    J Chem Phys; 2016 Jun; 144(21):214101. PubMed ID: 27276939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On the effectiveness of CCSD(T) complete basis set extrapolations for atomization energies.
    Feller D; Peterson KA; Hill JG
    J Chem Phys; 2011 Jul; 135(4):044102. PubMed ID: 21806085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. On the accuracy of explicitly correlated coupled-cluster interaction energies--have orbital results been beaten yet?
    Patkowski K
    J Chem Phys; 2012 Jul; 137(3):034103. PubMed ID: 22830679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prediction of Reaction Barriers and Thermochemical Properties with Explicitly Correlated Coupled-Cluster Methods: A Basis Set Assessment.
    Zhang J; Valeev EF
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2012 Sep; 8(9):3175-86. PubMed ID: 26605729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Benchmark theoretical study of the π-π binding energy in the benzene dimer.
    Miliordos E; Aprà E; Xantheas SS
    J Phys Chem A; 2014 Sep; 118(35):7568-78. PubMed ID: 24761749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Calibration study of the CCSD(T)-F12a/b methods for C2 and small hydrocarbons.
    Feller D; Peterson KA; Hill JG
    J Chem Phys; 2010 Nov; 133(18):184102. PubMed ID: 21073208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of Explicitly Correlated Methods for Computing High-Accuracy Benchmark Energies for Noncovalent Interactions.
    Sirianni DA; Burns LA; Sherrill CD
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2017 Jan; 13(1):86-99. PubMed ID: 28068770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Improving "Silver-Standard" Benchmark Interaction Energies with Bond Functions.
    Dutta NN; Patkowski K
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2018 Jun; 14(6):3053-3070. PubMed ID: 29772176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Coupled-cluster methods with perturbative inclusion of explicitly correlated terms: a preliminary investigation.
    Valeev EF
    Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2008 Jan; 10(1):106-13. PubMed ID: 18075688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Variational formulation of perturbative explicitly-correlated coupled-cluster methods.
    Torheyden M; Valeev EF
    Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2008 Jun; 10(23):3410-20. PubMed ID: 18535724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Explicitly correlated combined coupled-cluster and perturbation methods.
    Shiozaki T; Valeev EF; Hirata S
    J Chem Phys; 2009 Jul; 131(4):044118. PubMed ID: 19655848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Approximations to complete basis set-extrapolated, highly correlated non-covalent interaction energies.
    Mackie ID; DiLabio GA
    J Chem Phys; 2011 Oct; 135(13):134318. PubMed ID: 21992316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Do CCSD and approximate CCSD-F12 variants converge to the same basis set limits? The case of atomization energies.
    Kesharwani MK; Sylvetsky N; Köhn A; Tew DP; Martin JML
    J Chem Phys; 2018 Oct; 149(15):154109. PubMed ID: 30342453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Basis set dependence of higher-order correlation effects in π-type interactions.
    Carrell EJ; Thorne CM; Tschumper GS
    J Chem Phys; 2012 Jan; 136(1):014103. PubMed ID: 22239765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.