These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25730638)

  • 1. Individual differences in working memory capacity and attentional control.
    Hiebel N; Zimmer HD
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2015 Mar; 69(1):17-27. PubMed ID: 25730638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interference within the focus of attention: working memory tasks reflect more than temporary maintenance.
    Shipstead Z; Engle RW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jan; 39(1):277-89. PubMed ID: 22612165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Decomposing the n-back task: An individual differences study using the reference-back paradigm.
    Rac-Lubashevsky R; Kessler Y
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Sep; 90():190-9. PubMed ID: 27425422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Individual differences in working memory capacity are reflected in different ERP and EEG patterns to task difficulty.
    Dong S; Reder LM; Yao Y; Liu Y; Chen F
    Brain Res; 2015 Aug; 1616():146-56. PubMed ID: 25976774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The contribution of attentional lapses to individual differences in visual working memory capacity.
    Adam KC; Mance I; Fukuda K; Vogel EK
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2015 Aug; 27(8):1601-16. PubMed ID: 25811710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Principal component analysis of behavioural individual differences suggests that particular aspects of visual working memory may relate to specific aspects of attention.
    Machizawa MG; Driver J
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 May; 49(6):1518-26. PubMed ID: 21130786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Electrophysiological evidence for different effects of working memory load on interference control in adolescents than adults.
    Spronk M; Jonkman LM
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2012 Jan; 83(1):24-35. PubMed ID: 21993351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Early auditory evoked potential is modulated by selective attention and related to individual differences in visual working memory capacity.
    Giuliano RJ; Karns CM; Neville HJ; Hillyard SA
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2014 Dec; 26(12):2682-90. PubMed ID: 25000526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Attentional capture by working memory contents.
    Pan Y
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2010 Jun; 64(2):124-8. PubMed ID: 20565178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Attentional guidance by working memory differs by paradigm: an individual-differences approach.
    Dowd EW; Kiyonaga A; Egner T; Mitroff SR
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Apr; 77(3):704-12. PubMed ID: 25737257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The influence of lapses of attention on working memory capacity.
    Unsworth N; Robison MK
    Mem Cognit; 2016 Feb; 44(2):188-96. PubMed ID: 26450588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The development of non-spatial working memory capacity during childhood and adolescence and the role of interference control: an N-Back task study.
    Schleepen TM; Jonkman LM
    Dev Neuropsychol; 2010; 35(1):37-56. PubMed ID: 20390591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Focused, unfocused, and defocused information in working memory.
    Rerko L; Oberauer K
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jul; 39(4):1075-96. PubMed ID: 23421511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Investigating the influence of working memory capacity when driving behavior is combined with cognitive load: An LCT study of young novice drivers.
    Ross V; Jongen EM; Wang W; Brijs T; Brijs K; Ruiter RA; Wets G
    Accid Anal Prev; 2014 Jan; 62():377-87. PubMed ID: 23915472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Variation in the use of cues to guide visual working memory.
    Robison MK; Unsworth N
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Aug; 79(6):1652-1665. PubMed ID: 28547679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Working-memory capacity predicts the executive control of visual search among distractors: the influences of sustained and selective attention.
    Poole BJ; Kane MJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Jul; 62(7):1430-54. PubMed ID: 19123118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Working memory and fluid intelligence: capacity, attention control, and secondary memory retrieval.
    Unsworth N; Fukuda K; Awh E; Vogel EK
    Cogn Psychol; 2014 Jun; 71():1-26. PubMed ID: 24531497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The concurrent validity of the N-back task as a working memory measure.
    Jaeggi SM; Buschkuehl M; Perrig WJ; Meier B
    Memory; 2010 May; 18(4):394-412. PubMed ID: 20408039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of 42 hr of total sleep deprivation on component processes of verbal working memory.
    Turner TH; Drummond SP; Salamat JS; Brown GG
    Neuropsychology; 2007 Nov; 21(6):787-95. PubMed ID: 17983292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. On altering motion perception via working memory-based attention shifts.
    Turatto M; Vescovi M; Valsecchi M
    J Vis; 2008 May; 8(5):11.1-13. PubMed ID: 18842082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.