These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

261 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25731581)

  • 1. Evaluation of the effects of nonlinear frequency compression on speech recognition and sound quality for adults with mild to moderate hearing loss.
    Picou EM; Marcrum SC; Ricketts TA
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Mar; 54(3):162-9. PubMed ID: 25731581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of frequency compression and frequency transposition on fricative and affricate perception in listeners with normal hearing and mild to moderate hearing loss.
    Alexander JM; Kopun JG; Stelmachowicz PG
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(5):519-32. PubMed ID: 24699702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of nonlinear frequency compression on Mandarin speech and sound-quality perception in hearing-aid users.
    Chen X; You Y; Yang J; Qian J; Lu Q; Kuehnel V; Rehmann J; Liu B; Xu L
    Int J Audiol; 2020 Jul; 59(7):524-533. PubMed ID: 32441563
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The influence of audibility on speech recognition with nonlinear frequency compression for children and adults with hearing loss.
    McCreery RW; Alexander J; Brennan MA; Hoover B; Kopun J; Stelmachowicz PG
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(4):440-7. PubMed ID: 24535558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Patient-Centered, Provider-Facilitated Approach to the Refinement of Nonlinear Frequency Compression Parameters Based on Subjective Preference Ratings of Amplified Sound Quality.
    Johnson EE; Light KC
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Sep; 26(8):689-702. PubMed ID: 26333877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Nonlinear frequency compression: effects on sound quality ratings of speech and music.
    Parsa V; Scollie S; Glista D; Seelisch A
    Trends Amplif; 2013 Mar; 17(1):54-68. PubMed ID: 23539261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Benefit from non-linear frequency compression hearing aids in a clinical setting: the effects of duration of experience and severity of high-frequency hearing loss.
    Hopkins K; Khanom M; Dickinson AM; Munro KJ
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Apr; 53(4):219-28. PubMed ID: 24617592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Investigation of Extended Bandwidth Hearing Aid Amplification on Speech Intelligibility and Sound Quality in Adults with Mild-to-Moderate Hearing Loss.
    Seeto A; Searchfield GD
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Mar; 29(3):243-254. PubMed ID: 29488874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Listening Effort and Speech Recognition with Frequency Compression Amplification for Children and Adults with Hearing Loss.
    Brennan MA; Lewis D; McCreery R; Kopun J; Alexander JM
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Oct; 28(9):823-837. PubMed ID: 28972471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perceptual acclimatization post nonlinear frequency compression hearing aid fitting in older children.
    Glista D; Scollie S; Sulkers J
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Dec; 55(6):1765-87. PubMed ID: 22615475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
    Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Speech recognition in noise using bilateral open-fit hearing aids: the limited benefit of directional microphones and noise reduction.
    Magnusson L; Claesson A; Persson M; Tengstrand T
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Jan; 52(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 22928919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How directional microphones affect speech recognition, listening effort and localisation for listeners with moderate-to-severe hearing loss.
    Picou EM; Ricketts TA
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Dec; 56(12):909-918. PubMed ID: 28738747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Audibility and Spectral-Ripple Discrimination Thresholds as Predictors of Word Recognition with Nonlinear Frequency Compression.
    Brennan MA; McCreery RW
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2021 Oct; 32(9):596-605. PubMed ID: 35176803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Benefit from, and acclimatization to, frequency compression hearing aids in experienced adult hearing-aid users.
    Ellis RJ; Munro KJ
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Jan; 54(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 25470620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of the CAM2 and NAL-NL2 hearing aid fitting methods.
    Moore BC; Sęk A
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):83-95. PubMed ID: 22878351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Binaural dichotic presentation to reduce the effects of spectral masking in moderate bilateral sensorineural hearing loss.
    Kulkarni PN; Pandey PC; Jangamashetti DS
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Apr; 51(4):334-44. PubMed ID: 22201526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perception of temporally processed speech by listeners with hearing impairment.
    Calandruccio L; Doherty KA; Carney LH; Kikkeri HN
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):512-23. PubMed ID: 17609613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Speech audiometry with logatomes].
    Welge-Lüssen A; Hauser R; Erdmann J; Schwob C; Probst R
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1997 Feb; 76(2):57-64. PubMed ID: 9172631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. European multi-centre study of the Nucleus Hybrid L24 cochlear implant.
    Lenarz T; James C; Cuda D; Fitzgerald O'Connor A; Frachet B; Frijns JH; Klenzner T; Laszig R; Manrique M; Marx M; Merkus P; Mylanus EA; Offeciers E; Pesch J; Ramos-Macias A; Robier A; Sterkers O; Uziel A
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Dec; 52(12):838-48. PubMed ID: 23992489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.