These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25731689)

  • 21. Assessment of the 3-D shape and mechanics of the proximal femur using a shape template and a bone mineral density image.
    Väänänen SP; Isaksson H; Julkunen P; Sirola J; Kröger H; Jurvelin JS
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2011 Jul; 10(4):529-38. PubMed ID: 20809392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Biomechanics of fracture risk prediction of the hip and spine by quantitative computed tomography.
    Hayes WC; Piazza SJ; Zysset PK
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1991 Jan; 29(1):1-18. PubMed ID: 1985322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The biomechanics of the T2 femoral nailing system: a comparison of synthetic femurs withfinite element analysis.
    Bougherara H; Zdero R; Miric M; Shah S; Hardisty M; Zalzal P; Schemitsch EH
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2009 Apr; 223(3):303-14. PubMed ID: 19405436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The biomechanics of human femurs in axial and torsional loading: comparison of finite element analysis, human cadaveric femurs, and synthetic femurs.
    Papini M; Zdero R; Schemitsch EH; Zalzal P
    J Biomech Eng; 2007 Feb; 129(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 17227093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Quantitative computed tomography-based predictions of vertebral strength in anterior bending.
    Buckley JM; Cheng L; Loo K; Slyfield C; Xu Z
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Apr; 32(9):1019-27. PubMed ID: 17450078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Prediction of proximal femur strength using a CT-based nonlinear finite element method: differences in predicted fracture load and site with changing load and boundary conditions.
    Bessho M; Ohnishi I; Matsumoto T; Ohashi S; Matsuyama J; Tobita K; Kaneko M; Nakamura K
    Bone; 2009 Aug; 45(2):226-31. PubMed ID: 19398043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Prediction of micromotion initiation of an implanted femur under physiological loads and constraints using the finite element method.
    Andreaus U; Colloca M
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2009 Jul; 223(5):589-605. PubMed ID: 19623912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Femoral fracture load and fracture pattern is accurately predicted using a gradient-enhanced quasi-brittle finite element model.
    Haider IT; Goldak J; Frei H
    Med Eng Phys; 2018 May; 55():1-8. PubMed ID: 29551293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Volumetric quantitative computed tomography of the proximal femur: relationships linking geometric and densitometric variables to bone strength. Role for compact bone.
    Bousson V; Le Bras A; Roqueplan F; Kang Y; Mitton D; Kolta S; Bergot C; Skalli W; Vicaut E; Kalender W; Engelke K; Laredo JD
    Osteoporos Int; 2006; 17(6):855-64. PubMed ID: 16547689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Linear and nonlinear analyses of femoral fractures: Computational/experimental study.
    Mirzaei M; Alavi F; Allaveisi F; Naeini V; Amiri P
    J Biomech; 2018 Oct; 79():155-163. PubMed ID: 30135015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Experimental validation of a finite element model of a human cadaveric tibia.
    Gray HA; Taddei F; Zavatsky AB; Cristofolini L; Gill HS
    J Biomech Eng; 2008 Jun; 130(3):031016. PubMed ID: 18532865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A robust 3D finite element simulation of human proximal femur progressive fracture under stance load with experimental validation.
    Hambli R; Allaoui S
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2013 Dec; 41(12):2515-27. PubMed ID: 23864338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Multiple loading conditions analysis can improve the association between finite element bone strength estimates and proximal femur fractures: a preliminary study in elderly women.
    Falcinelli C; Schileo E; Balistreri L; Baruffaldi F; Bordini B; Viceconti M; Albisinni U; Ceccarelli F; Milandri L; Toni A; Taddei F
    Bone; 2014 Oct; 67():71-80. PubMed ID: 25014885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Microstructural failure mechanisms in the human proximal femur for sideways fall loading.
    Nawathe S; Akhlaghpour H; Bouxsein ML; Keaveny TM
    J Bone Miner Res; 2014 Feb; 29(2):507-15. PubMed ID: 23832419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Investigating the mechanical response of paediatric bone under bending and torsion using finite element analysis.
    Altai Z; Viceconti M; Offiah AC; Li X
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2018 Aug; 17(4):1001-1009. PubMed ID: 29525976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Mechanical behavior of metastatic femurs through patient-specific computational models accounting for bone-metastasis interaction.
    Falcinelli C; Di Martino A; Gizzi A; Vairo G; Denaro V
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2019 May; 93():9-22. PubMed ID: 30738327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Curved Beam Computed Tomography based Structural Rigidity Analysis of Bones with Simulated Lytic Defect: A Comparative Study with Finite Element Analysis.
    Oftadeh R; Karimi Z; Villa-Camacho J; Tanck E; Verdonschot N; Goebel R; Snyder BD; Hashemi HN; Vaziri A; Nazarian A
    Sci Rep; 2016 Sep; 6():32397. PubMed ID: 27585495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Simulated lesions representative of metastatic disease predict proximal femur failure strength more accurately than idealized lesions.
    Johnson JE; Brouillette MJ; Permeswaran PT; Miller BJ; Goetz JE
    J Biomech; 2020 Jun; 106():109825. PubMed ID: 32517984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Prediction of fracture callus mechanical properties using micro-CT images and voxel-based finite element analysis.
    Shefelbine SJ; Simon U; Claes L; Gold A; Gabet Y; Bab I; Müller R; Augat P
    Bone; 2005 Mar; 36(3):480-8. PubMed ID: 15777656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A biomechanical and finite element analysis of femoral neck notching during hip resurfacing.
    Davis ET; Olsen M; Zdero R; Papini M; Waddell JP; Schemitsch EH
    J Biomech Eng; 2009 Apr; 131(4):041002. PubMed ID: 19275431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.