These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Impulsive responding on the peak-interval procedure. Matell MS; Portugal GS Behav Processes; 2007 Feb; 74(2):198-208. PubMed ID: 17023122 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fewer peak trials per session facilitate acquisition of peak responding despite elimination of response rate differences. Kaiser DH Behav Processes; 2009 Jan; 80(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 18793706 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Shifts in the psychophysical function in rats. Guilhardi P; Macinnis ML; Church RM; Machado A Behav Processes; 2007 Jun; 75(2):167-75. PubMed ID: 17360131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Timing in a variable interval procedure: evidence for a memory singularity. Matell MS; Kim JS; Hartshorne L Behav Processes; 2014 Jan; 101():49-57. PubMed ID: 24012783 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The long-term effect of high- and low-rate responding histories on fixed-interval responding in rats. Cole MR J Exp Anal Behav; 2001 Jan; 75(1):43-54. PubMed ID: 11256866 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of reinforcer magnitude on responding under differential-reinforcement-of-low-rate schedules of rats and pigeons. Doughty AH; Richards JB J Exp Anal Behav; 2002 Jul; 78(1):17-30. PubMed ID: 12144310 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Investigations of timing during the schedule and reinforcement intervals with wheel-running reinforcement. Belke TW; Christie-Fougere MM Behav Processes; 2006 Nov; 73(3):240-7. PubMed ID: 16844324 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of intruded events on peak time: the role of reinforcement history during the intruded event. Aum S; Brown BL; Hemmes NS Behav Processes; 2007 Feb; 74(2):187-97. PubMed ID: 17157998 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Increased generalization in a peak procedure after delayed reinforcement. Buriticá J; Alcalá E Behav Processes; 2019 Dec; 169():103978. PubMed ID: 31580905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Time left: linear versus logarithmic subjective time. Gibbon J; Church RM J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1981 Apr; 7(2):87-107. PubMed ID: 7241054 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Drug discrimination in rats under concurrent variable-interval variable-interval schedules. McMillan DE; Hardwick WC J Exp Anal Behav; 2000 Jan; 73(1):103-20. PubMed ID: 10682343 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. When to respond? And how much? Temporal control and response output on mixed-fixed-interval schedules with unequally probable components. Whitaker S; Lowe CF; Wearden JH Behav Processes; 2008 Jan; 77(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 17628349 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Time and memory: towards a pacemaker-free theory of interval timing. Staddon JE; Higa JJ J Exp Anal Behav; 1999 Mar; 71(2):215-51. PubMed ID: 10220931 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]